Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:36:28.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beyond Inadvertent Ventriloquism: Caring Virtues for Anti‐paternalist Development Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

I argue that the epistemological virtues of concrete thinking, self‐transparency, and narrative understanding developed by care ethicists can help international development practitioners combat their own temptations to engage in “unconscious unjustified paternalism” (UUP). I develop the concept of UUP—a type of paternalism in which one party unjustifiably substitutes her judgment for another's because of difficulty distinguishing her desires for the other from the other's good. I show that the temptation to UUP is endemic to development and that care ethics contains virtues for combating it. Key to my claim is a view of caregiving as a practice of negotiating conflict.

Type
Responsibility and Identity in Global Justice
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2001. On judging epistemic credibility: Is social identity relevant? In Engendering rationalities, ed. Tuana, Nancy and Morgen, Sandra. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chambers, Robert. 1994. All power deceives. IDS Bulletin 25(2): 1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Bill, and Kothari, Uma. 2001. Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cornwall, Andrea. 2007. Myths to live by: Female solidarity and autonomy reconsidered. Development and Change 38(1): 149–68.Google Scholar
Crocker, David. 1991. Insiders and outsiders in international development. Ethics and International Affairs 5(1): 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, Robin S. 1992. Care and respect. In Explorations in feminist ethics, ed. Cole, Eve Browning and Coultrap‐McQuin, Susan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fiedrich, Marc. 2004. I told them not to love one another. Transformation 54:1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic injustice: power and ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1993. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1995. Moral orientation and moral development. In Justice and care: Essential readings in feminist ethics, ed. Held, Virginia. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 2006. The ethics of care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1995. Caring as a feminst practice of moral reason. In Justice and care: Essential readings in feminist ethics, ed. Held, Virginia. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Khader, Serene J. 2011 (forthcoming). Adaptive preferences and empowerment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's labor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mohan, Giles. 2001. Beyond participation. In Participation: The new tyranny, ed. Cook, Bill and Kothari, Uma. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1991. Under Western eyes. In Third world women and the politics of feminism, ed. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Russo, Ann, and Torres, Lourdes. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Leonard. 1996. Study circles on HIV/AIDS for Africa. Adult Education and Development 47:317–31.Google Scholar
Robinson, Fiona. 1999. Globalizing care. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1995. Maternal thinking. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana. 2000. Paternalism, unconscionability doctrine, and accommodation. Philosophy and Public Affairs 29(3): 205–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar