Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:45:08.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can There Be A Feminist Science?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Helen E. Longino
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 2 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Feminism and Science, Part 1 , Fall 1987 , pp. 51 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addelson, Kathryn Pine. 1983. The man of professional wisdom. In Discovering reality, ed. Sandra, Harding, and Hintikka, Merrill. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Ruth, Bleier. 1984. Science and gender. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Ruth, Doell, and Longino, Helen E. N.d. Journal of Homosexuality. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gerald, Edelman and Mountcastle, Vernon. 1978. The mindful brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. 1984. Review of Ruth Bleier, Science and gender. New York Times Book Review, LVI, 7 (August 12): 1.Google Scholar
Sandra, Harding. 1980. The norms of inquiry and masculine experience. In PSA 1980, Vol. 2, ed. Asquith, Peter and Giere, Ronald. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Jacob, James R. 1977. Robert Boyle and the English Revolution, A study in social and intellectual change. New York: Franklin.Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret C. 1976. The Newtonians and the English Revolution, 1689‐1720. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Helen, Longino. 1979. Evidence and hypothesis. Philosophy of Science 46(1): 35–56.Google Scholar
Helen, Longino. 1981. Scientific objectivity and feminist theorizing. Liberal Education 67(3): 33–41.Google Scholar
Helen, Longino. 1983a. The idea of a value free science. Paper presented to the Pacific Division of the American Philosophical Association, March 25, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Helen, Longino. 1983b. Scientific objectivity and logics of science. Inquiry 26(1): 85–106.Google Scholar
Helen, Longino. 1983c. Beyond “bad science.” Science, Technology and Human Values 8(1): 7–17.Google Scholar
Helen, Longino and Doell, Ruth. 1983. Body, bias and behavior. Signs 9(2): 206–227.Google Scholar
Maria, Lugones and Spelman, Elizabeth. 1983. Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural imperialism and the demand for “the woman's voice.” Hypatia 1, published as a special issue of Women's Studies International Forum 6(6): 573–581.Google Scholar
Hilary, Rose. 1983. Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs 9(1): 73–90.Google Scholar
Margaret, Rossiter. 1982. Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sandra, Witelson. 1985. An exchange on gender. New York Review of Books (October 24).Google Scholar