Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T07:33:36.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is the Lack of Women in Philosophy a Universal Phenomenon? Exploring Women's Representation in Greek Departments of Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Although recent empirical research suggests that there is a gender gap in Anglophone philosophy, no research has been done on the representation of women in non‐Anglophone philosophy. The present study constitutes a first step toward filling this void in the literature by providing empirical evidence on the representation of female students and female faculty members in Greek universities' departments of philosophy. Our findings indicate that the underrepresentation of female students in philosophy is not a universal phenomenon, since female students constitute the majority of philosophy students in Greece at both the undergraduate and the graduate levels. However, our findings also suggest that the low number of women in philosophy at the faculty level is not a problem unique to Anglophone philosophy, since female faculty members comprise, on average, only 29% of philosophy faculty members in Greece. In order to explain these findings, we argue, first, that the teaching of philosophy at the secondary level may motivate female students in Greece to enter and persist in philosophy, and, second, that since the gender gap at the faculty level in Greece cannot be attributed to the low number of female students in the philosophy pipeline, the causes of women's poor participation in philosophy at the faculty level should be looked for elsewhere.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antony, Louise. 2012. Different voices or perfect storm: Why are there so few women in philosophy? Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3): 227–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, Helen, and Saul, Jennifer. 2011. Women in philosophy in the UK: A report by the British Philosophical Association and the Society for Women in Philosophy UK. http://www.bpa.ac.uk/uploads/2011/02/BPA_Report_Women_In_Philosophy.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Glenys, Beebee, Helen, Goddard, Eliza, and Rini, Adriane. 2013. Seeing the trends in the data. In Women in philosophy: What needs to change? ed. Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2009. The undergraduate pipeline problem. Hypatia 24 (2): 216–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2015. Precluded interests. Hypatia 30 (2): 475–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, Tom, Baron, Samuel, and Miller, Kristie. 2015. Female under‐representation among philosophy majors: A map of the hypotheses and a survey of the evidence. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 1 (1): 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ELSTAT. 2012a. ISC1. Undergraduate students by field of study (ISCED), university, school, and department. http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED33/2012.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2012b. ISC1M. Graduate students by field of study (ISCED), university, school, and department. http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED33/2012.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2013a. ISC1. Undergraduate students by field of study (ISCED), university, school, and department. http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED33/2013.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2013b. ISC1M. Graduate students by field of study (ISCED), university, school, and department. http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED33/2013.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2014a. ISC1. Undergraduate students by field of study (ISCED), university, school, and department. http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED33/2014.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2014b. ISC1M. Graduate students by field of study (ISCED), university, school, and department. http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED33/2014.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2014c. 01. Lower secondary education schools (gymnasia) and full‐time staff by gender, field, district, type (morning–afternoon), sector (public–private). http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED21/2014.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2014d. 01. Upper secondary education schools (lyceums) and full‐time staff by gender, field, district, type (morning–afternoon), sector (public–private). http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED23/.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2014e. 02. Marriages in Greece by age of bridegroom bride (Years 2000–2013) (2000–2014). http://www.statistics.gr/en/statistics/-/publication/SPO06/2014.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2014f. 02. Hellas total—Live births by event year, mother's age and child's birth within marriage or out of wedlock (1980‐2014). http://www.statistics.gr/en/statistics/-/publication/SPO03/2014.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2015a. ISC1. Undergraduate students by field of study (ISCED), university, school, and department. http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED33/2015.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2015b. ISC1M. Graduate students by field of study (ISCED), university, school, and department. http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED33/2015.Google Scholar
ELSTAT. 2015c. 02.1. Faculty members by gender, field of study, university, school, and department. http://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/-/publication/SED33/2015.Google Scholar
Forgas, Joseph P. 2011. She just doesn't look like a philosopher…? Affective influences on the halo effect in impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology 41 (7): 812–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Eliza. 2008. Improving the participation of women in the philosophy profession; Report C: Students by gender in philosophy programs in Australian Universities. http://aap.org.au/Resources/Documents/publications/IPWPP/IPWPP_ReportC_Students.pdfGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2008. Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia 23 (2): 210–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, Katrina, and Jenkins, Fiona, eds. 2013. Women in philosophy: What needs to change?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, Anne, Salovey, Peter, and Casey‐Cannon, Shannon. 1999. Challenges facing female doctoral students and recent graduates. Psychology of Women Quarterly 23 (3): 607–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2007. Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, David. 2015. Snookered. The Times Literary Supplement, July 15.Google Scholar
Paxton, Molly, Figdor, Carrie, and Tiberius, Valerie. 2012. Quantifying the gender gap: An empirical study of the underrepresentation of women in philosophy. Hypatia 27 (4): 949–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, Rebecca, and Shaw, Claire. 2015. Philosophy is for posh, white boys with trust funds—why are there so few women? The Guardian, January 5.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Chemistry. 2008. The chemistry PhD: The impact on women's retention. https://www.wisecampaign.org.uk/uploads/wise/files/archive/the_chemistry_phdwomensretention_tcm18-139215.pdf.Google Scholar
Schouten, Gina. 2016. Philosophy in schools: Can early exposure solve philosophy's gender problem? Hypatia 31 (2): 275–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric, and Jennings, Carolyn Dicey. 2017. Women in philosophy: Quantitative analysis of specialization, prevalence, visibility, and generational change. Public Affairs Quarterly 31 (2): 83105.Google Scholar