Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:50:43.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Justice and Care in Close Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Jasminka Udovicki
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The essay examines the impartialist view of justice as the first virtue of all relationships. I argue that in close associations where duties, obligations, and rights of persons are situationally contingent, abstract principles of justice fail to yield a unified moral perspective about what is fair. Solidarity and trust as moral emotions develop more complex moral competencies that go beyond what principles of justice alone require.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Summer 1993 , pp. 48 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellah, Robert, Madsen, Richard, Sullivan, William, Swidler, Ann, and Tipton, Steven, eds. 1985. Habits of the Heart. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1986. The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg‐Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. Praxis International 5(4): 402–24.Google Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1986. Iris Murdoch and the domain of the moral. Philosophical Studies 50: 343–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1987. Particularity and responsiveness. In The emergence of morality in young children. See Kagan and Lamb 1987.Google Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1988. Gilligan and Kohlberg: Implications for moral theory. Ethics 98(3): 472–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, John. 1983. Women's rationality and men's virtues: A critique of gender dualism in Gilligan's theory of moral development. Social Research 50 (3): 597–642.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1990. Caring and evil. Hypatia 5(1): 101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, Owen. 1991. Varieties of moral personality. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, Flanagan and Adler, Jonathan. 1983. Impartiality and particularity. Social Research 50(3): 577–96.Google Scholar
Owen, Flanagan and Jackson, Kathryn. 1987. Justice, care and gender: The Kohlberg‐Gilligan debate revisited. Ethics 97(Apr. 1987): 622–37.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1986. Toward a discourse ethic of solidarity. Praxis International 5(4): 425–29.Google Scholar
Merilyn, Friedman. 1988. Beyond caring: the de‐moralization of gender. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13: 87–110.Google Scholar
1989. Feminism and modern friendship: Dislocating the community. Ethics 99 (Jan 1989): 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 1973. The moral rules. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1983. Do social sciences have an adequate theory of moral development? In Social science as moral inquiry, ed. Haan, Norma, Bellah, P. Rabinow Robert, and Sullivan, William. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, and Wiggins, Grant. 1987. The origins of morality in early childhood relations. In The emergence of morality in young children. See Kagan and Lamb. 1987.Google Scholar
Haan, Norma, Aerts, Elaine, and Cooper, Bruce. 1985. On moral grounds. New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah. 1990. Some concerns about Nel Noddings' Caring. Hypatia 5(1): 109–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, Barbara. 1990. Caring and exploitation. Hypatia 5(1): 115–19.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1990.tb00395.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Jerome, and Lamb, Sharon, eds. 1987. The emergence of morality in young children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Monika. 1984. Resolving conflicts in friendship: The development of moral understanding in everyday life. In Morality, moral behavior, and moral development. See Kurtines and Gewirtz 1984.Google Scholar
Kernberg, Otto. 1985. Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Aronson.Google Scholar
Kurtines, William M. and Gewitrz, Jacob L., eds. 1984. Morality, moral behavior, and moral development. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1982. How moral agents became ghosts. Synthese 53: 259–312.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1990 A response. Hypatia 5(1): 120–26.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1990.tb00396.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunner‐Winkler, Gertrud. 1984. Two moralities? A critical discussion of an ethic of care and responsibility versus an ethic of rights and justice. In Morality, moral behavior, and moral development. See Kurtines and Gewirtz.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989a. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989b. Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics 99: 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy. 1989. The fabric of character. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Staub, Erwin. 1984. Steps toward a comprehensive theory of moral conduct. In Morality, moral behavior, and moral development. See Kurtines and Gewirtz 1984.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 1980. Love and adulthood in American culture. In Themes of work and love in adulthood, ed. Smelser, Neil and Erickson, Erik. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1987. Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. Signs 12(4): 644–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar