Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:54:10.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mean Spirits: The Politics of Contempt Between Feminist Generations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Madelyn Detloff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Current models for individuatton in academe exacerbate generational tensions between second and third wave feminists. Feminist pedagogues must be wary of getting caught in the “vicious circle of contempt,” where students are expected to compensate for a teacher's past narcissistic wounds, instead, we must be willing to mourn the wounds we have received at the hands of a contemptuous culture and to acknowledge same-gender attachments that are disavowed in dialectical models of subject production.

Type
Third Generation
Information
Hypatia , Volume 12 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Third Wave Feminisms , Summer 1997 , pp. 76 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Elizabeth. 1990. Race, class, and psychoanalysis? Opening questions. In Conflicts in feminism, ed. Hirsch, Marianne and Fox Keller, Evelyn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1971. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In Lenin and philosophy and other essays. Trans. Brewster, Ben. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
American Association of University Women. 1992. The AALW report: How schools shortchange girh. Washington, D. G: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1953. The second sex. Trans. Parshley, H. M.London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren, and Warner, Michael. 1995. What does queer theory teach us about X?. PMLA 110 (3): 343–49.Google Scholar
Bernikow, Louise. 1995. Political matricide: Feminism's second wave, third wave, and the amnesia problem. Paper read at the National Women's Studies Association 16th Annual Conference, Women's Movements: Cultural, Intellectual, Political (R)evolutions, University of Oklahoma, Norman .Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. 1989. Poetry, revisionism, repression. In Critical theory since 1965, ed. Adams, Hazard and Searle, Leroy. Tallahassee: Florida State University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1993. Wounded attachments. Political Theory 21(3): 390–410.10.1177/0090591793021003003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Johnnella E. 1991. Transforming the curriculum: Teaching about women of color. In Transforming the curriculum: Ethnic studies and women's studies, ed. Butler, Johnnella E. and Walter, John C.Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limitations of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chronicle of Higher Education. 1995. Women's‐studies group accused of ignoring “grrls.” 15 December, A17.Google Scholar
Facts and figures: Passing knowledge. 1995. Biaclc Enterprise 26(6): 25.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Black skin, white masks. Trans. Lam Markmann, Charles. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline ana punish: The birth of the prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo. 1996. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New revised edition. Trans. Bergman Ramos, Myra. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1953. Mourning and melancholia 1917. In Collected papers, ed. Jones, Ernest, trans. Riviere, Joan. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Fuss, Diana. 1995. Identification papers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Generation GAP. 1995. Grrrls protest National Women's Studies Association (NWSA) embedded conference. WMST‐L@UMDD.UMD.EDU [electronic mailing list]. 29 November. File no. 010234; available from LISTSERV@UMDD.UMD.EDU; Internet.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald. 1987. Professing literature: An institutional history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 1991. Reading Buchi Emecheta: Contests for “women's experience” in women's studies. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Pomenohgy of spirit. Trans. Miller, A. V.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, Mae Gwendolyn. 1992. Speaking in tongues: Dialogics dialectics, and the black woman writer's literary tradition. In Feminists meorize tL. political, ed. Butler, Judith and Joan, W. Scott . New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kamen, Paula, Ripet, Elizabeth, and Kameya, Valerie. 1995. Generation X and the F word. Panel presented at the National Women's Studies Association 16th Annual Conference, Women's Movements: Cultural, Intellectual, Political (R)evolutions, University of Oklahoma, Norman.Google Scholar
Katz, Leon. 1963. The first making of The making of Americans. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1989. Black sun: Depression and melancholia. Trans. Roudiez, Leon S.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lauter, Paul. 1990. Canon theory and emergent practice. In Left politics and the literary profession, ed. Davis, Lennard J. and Bella Mirabella, M.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Alice. 1990a. The drama of the gifted child. Trans. Ward, Ruth. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Miller, Alice. 1990b. For your own good: Hidden cruelty in child'rearing and the roots of violence. Trans. Hannum, Hildegarde and Hannum, Hunter. New York: The Noonday Press.Google Scholar
Orenstein, Peggy. 1994. Schoolgirb: Young women, self‐esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Penley, Constance, and Ross, Andrew. 1991. Cyborgs at large: Interview with Donna Haraway. In Technoculture, ed. Penley, Constance and Ross, Andrew. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
Pipher, Mary. 1994. Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1979. Claiming an education 1977. In On lies, seaets, and silence: Selected prose, 19664978. New York: W. W Norton.Google Scholar
Riley, Denise. 1988. “Am I that name?” Feminism and the category of “women” in history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Carl, and Roethlisberger, F. J. 1991. Barriers and gateways to communication, Harvard Business Review 69(6): 105–11.Google Scholar
Sadker, Myra, and Sadker, David. 1995. Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 1990. Feminism and racism: A report on the 1981 National Women's Studies Association conference. In Making face, making soul: Haciendo caras, ed. Anzaldua, Gloria. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 1991. U.S. third world feminism: The theory and method of oppositional consciousness in the postmodern world. Genders 10(Spring): 1–24.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude. 1925-1995. The making of Americans. Paris: Contact Editions. Reprint, Normal, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1929. A room of one's own. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar