Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:07:25.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Confucian Concept of Jen and the Feminist Ethics of Care: A Comparative Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Chenyang Li
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article compares Confucian ethics of Jen and feminist ethics of care. It attempts to show that they share philosophically significant common grounds. Its findings affirm the view that care-orientation in ethics is not a characteristic peculiar to one sex. It also shows that care-orientation is not peculiar to subordinated social groups. Arguing that the oppression of women is not an essential element of Confucian ethics, the author indicates the Confucianism and feminism are compatible.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Winter 1994 , pp. 70 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benhabib, Seyla. 1987. The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg‐Gilligan controversy and moral theory. In Women and Moral Theory. See Kittay and Meyers 1987.Google Scholar
Blum, Lawrence A. 1988. Gilligan and Kohlberg: Implications for moral theory. Ethics 98(April): 472–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1991. Feminist ethics Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Chan, Wing‐Tsit. 1975. Chinese and western interpretations of Jen (humanity). Journal of Chinese Philosophy 2: 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Wing‐Tsit. 1963. A source book in Chinese philosophy. Trans. and compiled by Wing‐Tsit Chan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Wing‐Tsit. 1955. The evolution of the Confucian concept of Jen. Philosophy East and West 4(4): 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tainien, Chang. 1989. Studies of Chinese ethical theories (Zhong Guo Lun Li Si Xiang Yan Jiu, text in Chinese). Shanghai, China: Shanghai People's Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ssu, Confucius/Tzu. 1963. The doctrine of the mean. In A sourcebook in Chinese philosophy. See Chan 1963.Google Scholar
Yu‐lan, Fung. 1953. A history of Chinese philosophy vols. 1 & 2. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1987. The curious coincidence of feminine and African moralities: Challenges for feminist theory. In Women and Moral Theory. See Kitty and Meyers 1987.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1987a. Non‐contractual society: A feminist view. In Science, morality, and feminist theory, ed. by Hanen, Marsha and Nielson, Kai. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1987b. Feminism and moral theory. In Women and Moral Theory. See Kittay and Meyers 1987.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1991. Some thoughts about ‘caring.’ In Feminist ethics. See Card 1991.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder, and Meyers, Diana T., eds. 1987. Women and moral theory Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lai, Whalen. 1991. In defence of graded love. Asian Philosophy: An International Journal of Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Buddhist, Persian and Islamic Philosophical Tradition 1(1): 51–60.10.1080/09552369108575335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, D.C. 1970. Mencius Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Tzu, Mo. 1963. Mo Tzu. In A sourcebook in Chinese philosophy. See Chan 1963.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 1979. Practical ethics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teruo, Takeuchi. 1965. A study of the meaning of Jen advocated by Confucius. Acta Asiatica 9: 57–77.Google Scholar
Tong, Lik Kuen. 1973. Confucian Jen and Platonic eros: A comparative study. Chinese Culture 14(3): 1–8.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. 1987. Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12(4): 644–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei‐ming, Tu. 1981. Jen as a living metaphor in the Confucian Analects. Philosophy East and West 31(1): 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei‐ming, Tu. 1968. The creative tension between Jen and Li, Philosophy East and West 18(1‐‐2): 29–39.Google Scholar
Waley, Arthur. 1989. Analects of Confucius New York: Random House.Google Scholar