Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T20:11:40.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Justice as a Family Value: How a Commitment to Fairness is Compatible with Love

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Many discussions of love and the family treat issues of justice as something alien. On this view, concerns about whether one's family is internally just are in tension with the modes of interaction that are characteristic of loving families. In this essay, we challenge this widespread view. We argue that once justice becomes a shared family concern, its pursuit is compatible with loving familial relations. We examine four arguments for the thesis that a concern with justice is not at home within a loving family, and we explain why these arguments fail. We develop and defend an alternative conception of the justice‐oriented loving family, arguing that justice can—and, for the sake of justice, should—be seen as a family value.

Type
Open Issue Content
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank Herbert Anderson, Jochen Bojanowski, Beate Rössler, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. Earlier versions of this essay were presented at the 2009 conference on “Justice, Care, and the Family,” Erasmus University Rotterdam, and at the Practical Philosophy Research Group of the University of Groningen in 2012. We would like to thank the participants in both meetings for valuable comments and suggestions. Some of the ideas presented in this article appeared in German under the title “Die gerechtigkeitsorientierte Familie: Jenseits der Spannung zwischen Liebe und Gerechtigkeit,” in Von Person zu Person: Zur Moralität persönlicher Beziehungen, ed. Axel Honneth and Beate Rössler (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2008), 283–312.

References

Abbey, Ruth, and Den Uyl, Douglas J. 2001. The chief inducement? The idea of marriage as friendship. Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1): 3752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Joel. 2010. Is equality tearing the family apart? In Applied ethics: A multicultural approach, 5th edition, ed. May, Larry, Collins‐Chobanian, Shari and Wong, Kai. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
Anderson, Joel, and Claassen, Rutger. 2012. Sailing alone: Teenage autonomy and regimes of childhood. Law and Philosophy 31 (5): 495522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archard, David. 2010. The family: A liberal defence. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Ludvig. 2001. The liberal state and the politics of virtue. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N. 1990. The invasion of the money world. In Rebuilding the nest: A new commitment to the American family, ed. Blankenhorn, David, Bayme, Steven and Bethke Elshtain, Jean. Milwaukee, Wisc.: Family Service America.Google Scholar
Blankenhorn, David. 1990. American family dilemmas. In Rebuilding the nest: A new commitment to the American family, ed. Blankenhorn, David, Bayme, Steven and Bethke Elshtain, Jean. Milwaukee, Wisc.: Family Service America.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1996. Against marriage and motherhood. Hypatia 11 (3): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1999. Autonomy, necessity, and love. In Necessity, volition, and love. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 2003. Romantic love and personal autonomy. In Autonomy, gender, politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheaus, Anca. 2009. How much of what matters can we redistribute? Love, justice, and luck. Hypatia 24 (4): 6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1993. Feminist contractarianism. In A mind of one's own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity, ed. Anthony, Louise M. and Witt, Charlotte. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hardwig, John. 1990. Should women think in terms of rights? In Feminism and political theory, ed. Sunstein, Cass R.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Helm, Bennett. 2010. Love, friendship and the self: Intimate identification and the sociality of persons. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 2007a. Between justice and affection: The family as a field of moral disputes. In Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 2007b. Rejoinder. In Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory, ed. van den Brink, Bert and Owen, David. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jecker, Nancy. 2002. Taking care of one's own: Justice and family caregiving. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (2): 117–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. 1998. Just love? Marriage and the question of justice. Social Theory and Practice 24 (2): 261–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, Xavier, and Ebbe Juul Nielsen, Morten. 2012. Intra‐family inequality and justice. Dialogue 51 (1): 130.Google Scholar
Lasch, Christopher. 1977. Haven in a heartless world: The family besieged. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Shelly, and Pollak, Robert A. 1996. Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (4): 139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahony, Rhona. 1995. Kidding ourselves: Breadwinning, babies, and bargaining power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Munoz‐Dardé, Véronique. 1998. Rawls, justice in the family and justice of the family. Philosophical Quarterly 48 (192): 335–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munoz‐Dardé, Véronique. 1999. Is the family to be abolished then? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1): 3756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Penrose, Brian. 2000. Must the family be just? Philosophical Papers 29 (3): 189221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popenoe, David. 1988. Disturbing the nest: Family change and decline in modern societies. New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Radzik, Linda. 2005. Justice in the family: A defence of feminist contractarianism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1): 4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Stacy J., and Amato, Paul R. 2000. Have changes in gender relations affected marital quality? Social Forces 79 (2): 731–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 1997. Relationships and responsibilities. Philosophy & Public Affairs 26 (3): 189209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruton, Roger. 2006. A political philosophy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. 1998. Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late‐twentieth‐century America, with a new preface. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stack, Carol. 1974. All our kin. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Udovicki, Jasminka. 1993. Justice and care in close relationships. Hypatia 8 (3): 4860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, J. David. 1999. Love as a moral emotion. Ethics 109 (2): 355–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. When justice replaces affection: The need for rights. In Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiesmann, Stephanie, Boeije, Hennie, van Doorne‐Huiskes, Anneke, and den Dulk, Laura. 2008. “Not worth mentioning”: The implicit and explicit nature of decision‐making about the division of paid and domestic work. Community, Work & Family 11 (4): 341–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesmann, Stephanie. 2010. 24/7 Negotiation in couples’ transition to parenthood. Utrecht: ICS.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1981. Persons, character, and morality. In Moral luck. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 2002. The marriage problem: How our culture has weakened families. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Zurn, Christopher. 2012. Misrecognition, marriage, and derecognition. In Recognition theory as social research: Investigating the dynamics of social conflict, ed. O'Neill, Shane and Smith, Nicholas H.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar