Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T22:30:29.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Promising Monsters: Pregnant Bodies, Artistic Subjectivity, and Maternal Imagination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Rosemary Betterton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper engages with theories of the monstrous maternal in feminist philosophy to explore how examples of visual art practice by Susan Hiller, Marc Quinn, Alison Lapper, Tracey Emin, and Cindy Sherman disrupt maternal ideals in visual culture through differently imagined body schema. By examining instances of the pregnant body represented in relation to maternal subjectivity, disability, abortion, and “prosthetic” pregnancy, it asks whether the “monstrous” can offer different kinds of figurations of the maternal that acknowledge the agency and potential power of the pregnant subject.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 21 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Maternal Bodies , Winter 2006 , pp. 80 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1968. Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Battersby, Christine. 1998. The phenomenal woman: Feminist metaphysics and the patterns of identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Betterton, Rosemary. 1996. An intimate distance: Women, artists, and the body. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Betterton, Rosemary. 2002. Why is my art not as good as me? Feminism, femininity and “life drawing” in Tracey Emin's art. In The art of Tracey Emin. ed. Merck, Mandy and Townsend, Chris. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boulous Walker, Michelle. Philosophy and the maternal body: Thinking through silence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1996. Signs of wonder and traces of doubt: On teratology and embodied difference. In Between monsters, goddesses, and cyborgs: Feminist confrontations with science, medicine, and cyberspace. ed. Lykke, Nina and Braidotti, Rosi. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of belonging. Cambridge: Polity Press. Britart. http://www.britart.com/artists/artistl071_all.aspx.Google Scholar
Bronfen, Elizabeth. 1996. The knotted subject: Hysteria, Irma, and Cindy Sherman. In Generations and geographies in the visual arts: Feminist readings. ed. Pollock, Griselda. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bronfen, Elizabeth. 1998. The knotted subject: Hysteria and its discontents. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, Norman. 1991. The ideal and the abject: Cindy Sherman's historical portraits. Parkett 29: 91.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Constable, Catherine. 1999. Becoming the monster's mother: Morphologies of identity in the Alien series. In Alien zone 11. ed. Kuhn, Annette. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Corby, Vanessa. 2004. Something to show for it? Makers and making between trauma and cultural memory. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Creed, Barbara. 1993. The monstrous feminine: Film, feminism, and psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathy. 1997. Embodied practices: Feminist perspectives on the body. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Doyle, Jennifer. 2002. The effect of intimacy: Tracey Emin's bad‐sex aesthetic. In The art of Tracey Emin. ed. Merck, Mandy and Townsend, Chris. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Duden, Barbara. 1993. Disembodying women perspectives on pregnancy and the unborn. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Julia. 1999. The pregnant imagination, women's bodies and fetal rights. In Inventing maternity, politics, science, and literature, 1650‐‐1865. ed. Barash, Carol and Greenfield, Susan E.Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. 1991. Fetal fascinations: New dimensions to the medical‐scientific construction of fetal personhood. In Off centre: Feminism and cultural studies. ed. Franklin, Sarah, Lury, Celia, and Stacey, Jackie. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1996. Imaginary bodies: Essays on corporeality, power, and ethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elisabeth. 1994. Volatile bodies: Towards a corporeal feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1992. The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for in/appropriated others. In Cultural studies. ed. Grossberg, Larry, Nelson, Cary, and Treichler, Amy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartouni, Valerie. 1992. Fetal exposures: Abortion politics and the optics of allusion. Camera Obscura 29: 131–51.Google Scholar
Hiller, Susan. 1991. The myth ofprimkivism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huet, Marie‐Helene. 1991. Monstrous imagination: Progeny as art in French classicism. Critical Enquiry 17: 718–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Rosalind. 1993. Cindy Sherman (975‐‐1993. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980a. Stabat mater. In The Kristeva reader. ed. Moi, Toril. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980b. Motherhood according to Giovanni Bellini. In Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Annette. 1995. Family secrets: Acts of memory and imagination. London: Verso. London. 2005. http://www.london.gov.uk/view_press_release.jspreleaseid=2782.Google Scholar
Marland, Hilary, trans, and ed. 1987. “Mother and child were saved”: The memoirs (1693‐‐1740) of the Friesian midwife Catherina Schrader. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Merck, Mandy, and Townsend, Chris eds., 2002. The art of Tracey Emin. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mulvey, Laura. 1996. Cosmetics and abjection: Cindy Sherman 1977‐‐1987. In Fetishism and curiosity. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Petchesky, Rosalind. 1987. Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. In Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood and medicine. ed. Stanworth, Michelle. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy. 1993. Unmarked: The politics of performance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russo, Mary. The female grotesque: Risk, excess, and modernity. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shildrick, Margrit. 2002. Embodying the monster: Encounters with the vulnerable self. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Shildrick, Margrit. and Price, Janet. 1998. Vital signs: Feminist reconfigurations of the bio/logical body. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Stabile, Carole. 1992. Shooting the mother: Fetal photography and the politics of disappearance. Camera Obscura 28: 179–206.Google Scholar
Stacey, Jackie. 1997. Teratologies: A cultural study of cancer. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stacey, Jackie. 2003. She is not herself: The deviant relations of Alien Resurrection. Screen 44, no. 3 (Autumn): 251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallery, Tate. 2002. Marc Quinn. Liverpool: Tate Gallery.Google Scholar
Tyler, Imogen. 2000. Re‐framing pregnant embodiment. In Transformations: Thinking through feminism. ed. Ahmed, Sara, Kilby, Jane, Lury, Celia, McNeil, Maureen, and Skeggs, Beverly. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tyler, Imogen. 2001. Skin‐tight: Celebrity, pregnancy and subjectivity. In Thinking through the Skin. ed. Ahmed, Sara and Stacey, Jackie. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1998. Pregnant embodiment: Subjectivity and alienation. In Body and flesh: A philosophical reader. ed. Welton, Don. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar