Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T01:38:45.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Content Validation Is Fundamental for Optimizing the Criterion Validity of Personality Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Thomas A. O'Neill ,
Richard D. Goffin  and
Robert P. Tett
Thomas A. O'Neill*
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario
Richard D. Goffin
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario
Robert P. Tett
Affiliation:
The University of Tulsa
*
E-mail: toneill7@uwo.ca, Address: Department of Psychology, Social Science Center, The University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St., London, Ontario, Canada N6A-5 C2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 509 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Social Science Center, The University of Western Ontario

**

Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa.

References

Bartram, D. (2005). The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1185–1203.Google Scholar
Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 40–57.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100–112.Google Scholar
Hough, L. M. (1992). The “Big Five” personality variables—Construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139–155.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (1989). Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time? Human Performance, 2, 183–200.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (2009). Content validation is useful for many things, but validity isn't one of them. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 453–464.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R., & Shiarella, H. (1997). Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests: Multivariate frameworks for studying test validity. Personnel Psychology, 50, 823–854.Google Scholar
Raymark, P. H., Schmit, M. J., & Guion, R. M. (1997). Identifying potentially useful personality constructs for employee selection. Personnel Psychology, 50, 723–736.Google Scholar
Robertson, I. T., & Kinder, A. (1993). Personality and job competencies: The criterion-related validity of some personality variables. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 225–244.Google Scholar
Rothstein, M. G., & Goffin, R. D. (2006). The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support? Human Resource Management Review, 16, 155–180.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. B. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2007). Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye, Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). Personnel Psychology, 60, 967–993.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., Guterman, H. A., Bleier, A., & Murphy, P. J. (2000). Development and content validation of a “hyperdimensional” taxonomy of managerial competence. Human Performance, 13, 205–251.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., Rothstein, M., & Reddon, J. R. (1994). Meta-analysis of personality-job performance relations: A reply to Ones, Mount, Barrick, and Hunter (1994). Personnel Psychology, 47, 157–172.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., Rothstein, M., & Reddon, J. R. (1999). Meta-analysis of bidirectional relations in personality-job performance research. Human Performance, 12, 1–29.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., Steele, J. R., & Beauregard, R. S. (2003). Broad and narrow measures on both sides of the personality-job performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 335–356.Google Scholar