Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:24:55.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Content Validity Does Matter for the Criterion-Related Validity of Personality Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

H. Kristl Davison  and
Mark N. Bing
H. Kristl Davison*
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi
Mark N. Bing
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi
*
E-mail: kdavison@bus.olemiss.edu, Address: Department of Management, School of Business Administration, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 501 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Management, School of Business Administration, University of Mississippi

References

Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., & Whanger, J. C. (2006). Increases in validity as a function of frame-of-reference control in personality testing: Construct alteration vs. reliability enhancement . In Kluemper, D. H. (Chair), Self-report Measurement Issues in Micro Organizational Research. Symposium presented at the 66th Annual Conference of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Bing, M. N., Whanger, J. C., Davison, H. K., & VanHook, J. B. (2004). Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores: A replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 150–157.Google Scholar
Hunthausen, J. M., Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. B., & Hammer, B. L. (2003). A field study of frame-of-reference effects on personality test validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 545–551.Google Scholar
Lievens, F., DeCorte, W., & Schollaert, E. (2008). A closer look at the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores and validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 268–279.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (2009). Content validation is useful for many things, but validity isn't one of them. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 453–464.Google Scholar
Schmit, M. J., Ryan, A. M., Stierwalt, S. L., & Powell, S. L. (1995). Frame-of-reference effects on personality scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 607–620.Google Scholar