Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T02:22:30.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Executive Selection as a Strategic Business Decision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Audrey B. Smith  and
Ann Howard
Audrey B. Smith*
Affiliation:
Development Dimensions International
Ann Howard
Affiliation:
Development Dimensions International
*
E-mail: Audrey.Smith@ddiworld.com, Address: Development Dimensions International, 1225 Washington Pike, Bridgeville, PA 15017-2838
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 144 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hollenbeck, G. P. (2009). Executive selection—What's right … and what's wrong. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 130–143.Google Scholar
Howard, A. (2001). Identifying, assessing, and selecting senior leaders. In Zaccaro, S. J. & Klimoski, R. (Eds.), The nature of organizational leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
McCall, M. W. Jr., & Hollenbeck, G. P. (2007). Getting leader development right: Competence not competencies. In Conger, J. A. & Riggio, R. E. (Eds.), The practice of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .Google Scholar
Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372–376.Google Scholar