Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T17:55:31.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Will Getting Rid of Performance Ratings Affect Managers?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Christopher J. Lake  and
Alexandra Luong
Christopher J. Lake*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota Duluth
Alexandra Luong
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota Duluth
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Christopher J. Lake, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota Duluth, 1207 Ordean Court, Duluth, MN 55812. E-mail: lakec@d.umn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Amid the debate about getting rid of formal performance ratings, the practical implications for managers should be carefully considered. Adler et al. (2016) acknowledged some implications for managers who evaluate their subordinates with the traditional formal review. However, they do not fully explore the implications for managers when organizations trade formal performance reviews for frequent, less-formal performance conversations, which are a very popular alternative (Meinert, 2015; Rock & Jones, 2015; Wilkie, 2015). It is possible that organizations will benefit when formal performance reviews are removed; however, upon discussing this issue with a panel of human resources executives and organizational development practitioners, we were struck by their concern for how abandoning formalized review procedures would affect managers. This panel represented a wide array of industries (healthcare, retail, manufacturing, energy, academia, and the nonprofit sector), and their organizations used a variety of performance procedures, including formalized annual reviews and informal performance conversations. The goal of this commentary is to guide thinking, with the help of our practitioner-oriented panel, toward some of the obstacles managers may face in having to provide more frequent informal performance conversations.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 266 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9 (2), 219–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, K., Oah, S., & Dickinson, A. M. (2005). The relative effects of different frequencies of feedback on work performance. Journal of Organizational Behavioral Management, 23, 21–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinert, D. (2015, April). Reinventing reviews. HRMagazine, 60 (3), 36–42.Google Scholar
Mero, N. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1995). Effects of rater accountability on the accuracy and the favorability of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 517–524.Google Scholar
Rock, D., & Jones, B. (2015, September). Why more and more companies are ditching performance ratings. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/09/why-more-and-more-companies-are-ditching-performance-ratingsGoogle Scholar
Wilkie, D. (2015, August). Is the annual performance review dead? Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/employeerelations/articles/pages/performance-reviews-are-dead.aspxGoogle Scholar