Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-ksm4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T05:02:47.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research Commensurability: Or, the Loss of Analytical Precision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Ajnesh Prasad
Ajnesh Prasad*
Affiliation:
Australian School of Business
*
E-mail: ajnesh_prasad@yahoo.ca, Address: Australian School of Business, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 352 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London, UK: Heinemann. Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (1998). The myth of paradigm incommensurability in management studies: Comments by an integrationist. Organization, 5, 267–272. Google Scholar
Ferdman, B. M., & Sagiv, L. (2012). Diversity in organizations and cross-cultural work psychology: What if they were more connected? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 323–345. Google Scholar
Hoobler, J. M. (2005). Lip service to multiculturalism. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 49–56. Google Scholar
Jackson, N., & Carter, P. (1991). In defence of paradigm incommensurability. Organization Studies, 12, 109–127. Google Scholar
Jones, D. (2004). Screwing diversity out of the workers? Reading diversity. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 281–291. Google Scholar
Jones, D., & Stablein, R. (2006). Diversity as resistance and recuperation: Critical theory, post-structuralist perspectives and workplace diversity. In Konrad, A. M., Prasad, P., & Pringle, J. K. (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 145–166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Lee, A. S. (1991). Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organization Science, 2, 342–365. Google Scholar
Prasad, A. (2012). Beyond analytical dichotomies. Human Relations, 65, 567–595.Google Scholar
Prasad, A., & Mills, A. J. (2010). Critical management studies and business ethics: A synthesis and three research trajectories for the coming decade. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 227–237. Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Steinmann, H. (1999). Some remarks on the problem of incommensurability in organization studies. Organization Studies, 20, 519–544. Google Scholar
Willmott, H. (1993). Breaking the paradigm mentality. Organization Studies, 14, 681–719. Google Scholar