Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-16T22:15:00.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responsible Leadership: A Missing Link

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Susana C. Esper  and
Kathleen Boies
Susana C. Esper*
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
Kathleen Boies
Affiliation:
Concordia University
*
E-mail: kboies@jmsb.concordia.ca, Address: Department of Management, John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montréal, Québec, Canada H3G 1M8
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Aguinis and Glavas (2013) ask, “When and why does CSR lead to positive outcomes for employees, organizations, and society?” Although the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is elusive and comprises a wide range of definitions, there is convergence on the voluntary nature of these actions. But who implements these voluntary initiatives? CSR will take effect, as Aguinis and Glavas point out, at micro levels, through the actions of lower-level units and employees. Thus, there is a need to specify mechanisms by which macro-level CSR policies result in microlevel outcomes.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 351 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2013). Embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility: Psychological foundations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(4), 314–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. E., Leonard, H. B., Reffico, E., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: It is for corporations, too. In Nicholls, A. (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable change. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O'Neill, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 716–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Auster, E. R. (2011). Values, authenticity, and responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, A. M., Conway, E., Rousseau, D. M., & Flood, P. C. (2013). Promoting effective psychological contracts through leadership: The missing link between HR strategy and performance. Human Resource Management, 52, 289–310.Google Scholar
Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2011). Responsible leadership: Pathways to the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 3–13.Google Scholar
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577–594.Google Scholar
Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M., & Scherer, A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership and its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 1–16.Google Scholar