Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T23:18:05.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three cheers for descriptive statistics—and five more reasons why they matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2021

Marcus Credé  and
P. D. Harms
Marcus Credé
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
P. D. Harms*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
*
*Corresponding author. Email: pdharms@cba.ua.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 486 - 488
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73, 3–25.10.1037/amp0000191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, N., & Heathers, J. (2016). The GRIM test: Asimple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.10.1177/1948550616673876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Aiken, L., & West, S. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstances for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 315–346.10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credé, M., Gelman, A., & Nickerson, C. (2016). Questionable association between front boarding and air rage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, E7348.10.1073/pnas.1611704113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Credé, M., & Howardson, G. (2018). The structure of group task performance: Asecond look at “Collective Intelligence.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(10), 1483–1492.10.1037/apl0000176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), Article 341ps12. http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/8/341/341ps12.full Google Scholar
Grand, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, T. D., Landis, R. S., Reynolds, D. H., Scott, J. C., Tonidandel, S., & Truxillo, D. M. (2018). A systems-based approach to fostering robust science in industrial-organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11, 4–42.10.1017/iop.2017.55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, P. D. & Credé, M. (2020). Bringing the review process into the 21st century: Post-publication peer review. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(1), 51–53.10.1017/iop.2020.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, P. D., Credé, M., & DeSimone, J. A. (2018). The last line of defense: Corrigenda and retractions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11(1), 61–65.10.1017/iop.2017.86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K. (2021). In praise of Table 1: The importance of making better use of descriptive statistics. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(4), 461–477.Google Scholar
Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688. DOI: 10.1126/science.1193147 10.1126/science.1193147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed