Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:48:41.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Workers in Poverty: An Insight Into Informal Workers Around the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Mahima Saxena
Mahima Saxena*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mahima Saxena, Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, 3105 South Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60616. E-mail: msaxena1@iit.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Gloss, Carr, Reichman, Abdul-Nasiru, and Oestereich (2017) present compelling arguments on a moral/humanistic need for I-O psychologists to consider workers that are living and working in deep poverty. Their case nicely shifts focus to large percentages of global workers who heretofore have only been represented minimally in the scholarly discourse in our field. I would like to accomplish two goals in this commentary. First, I would like to present a brief historical perspective on why industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology's focus has been on POSH workers. Second, I will provide conceptual extensions to Gloss et al.’s (2017) focal article by presenting some insights into the world of informal workers.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 376 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gloss, A., Carr, S. C., Reichman, W., Abdul-Nasiru, I., & Oestereich, W. T. (2017). From handmaidens to POSH humanitarians: The case for making human capabilities the business of I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10 (3), 329–369.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33 (2–3), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ILO (International Labour Organization). (2013). The informal economy and decent work: A policy resource guide supporting transition to formality. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/emppolicy/pubs/WCMS_212688/lang–en/index.htm Google Scholar
Koppes, L. L. (2007). Historical perspectives in industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Münsterberg, H. (1913). Psychology and industrial efficiency. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Parthasarathi, P. (1998). Rethinking wages and competitiveness in the eighteenth century: Britain and South India. Past and Present, 158, 79–109.Google Scholar
Robins, N. (2002). Loot: In search of the East India Company, the world's first transnational corporation. Environment and Urbanization, 14 (1), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2011). Experiencing work: An essay on a person-centric work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar