Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T10:06:26.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical impact of early reinsertion of a central venous catheter after catheter removal in patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2020

Yu-Mi Lee ,
Byung-Han Ryu ,
Sun In Hong ,
Oh-Hyun Cho ,
Kyung-Wook Hong ,
In-Gyu Bae ,
Won Gun Kwack ,
Young Jin Kim ,
Eun Kyoung Chung  and
Dong Youn Kim
...Show all authors
Yu-Mi Lee
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Byung-Han Ryu
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
Sun In Hong
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
Oh-Hyun Cho
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
Kyung-Wook Hong
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea
In-Gyu Bae
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea
Won Gun Kwack
Affiliation:
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Young Jin Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Eun Kyoung Chung
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Dong Youn Kim
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Mi Suk Lee
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Ki-Ho Park*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
*
Author for correspondence: Ki-Ho Park, E-mail: parkkiho@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Early replacement of a new central venous catheter (CVC) may pose a risk of persistent or recurrent infection in patients with a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). We evaluated the clinical impact of early CVC reinsertion after catheter removal in patients with CRBSIs.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with confirmed CRBSIs in 2 tertiary-care hospitals over a 7-year period.

Results:

To treat their infections, 316 patients with CRBSIs underwent CVC removal. Among them, 130 (41.1%) underwent early CVC reinsertion (≤3 days after CVC removal), 39 (12.4%) underwent delayed reinsertion (>3 days), and 147 (46.5%) did not undergo CVC reinsertion. There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the 3 groups, except for nontunneled CVC, presence of septic shock, and reason for CVC reinsertion. The rate of persistent CRBSI in the early CVC reinsertion group (22.3%) was higher than that in the no CVC reinsertion group (7.5%; P = .002) but was similar to that in the delayed CVC reinsertion group (17.9%; P > .99). The other clinical outcomes did not differ among the 3 groups, including rates of 30-day mortality, complicated infection, and recurrence. After controlling for several confounding factors, early CVC reinsertion was not significantly associated with persistent CRBSI (OR, 1.59; P = .35) or 30-day mortality compared with delayed CVC reinsertion (OR, 0.81; P = .68).

Conclusions:

Early CVC reinsertion in the setting of CRBSI may be safe. Replacement of a new CVC should not be delayed in patients who still require a CVC for ongoing management.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , February 2021 , pp. 162 - 168
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

First authors of equal contribution.

References

Raad, I. Intravascular-catheter-related infections. Lancet 1998;351:893–898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimick, JB, Pelz, RK, Consunji, R, Swoboda, SM, Hendrix, CW, Lipsett, PA. Increased resource use associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in the surgical intensive care unit. Arch Surg 2001;136:229–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, V, Geiger, K, Concannon, C, Nelson, RE, Brown, J, Dumyati, G. Inpatient costs, mortality and 30-day re-admission in patients with central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20:O318–O324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soufir, L, Timsit, JF, Mahe, C, Carlet, J, Regnier, B, Chevret, S. Attributable morbidity and mortality of catheter-related septicemia in critically ill patients: a matched, risk-adjusted, cohort study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:396–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erbay, A, Ergonul, O, Stoddard, GJ, Samore, MH. Recurrent catheter-related bloodstream infections: risk factors and outcome. Int J Infect Dis 2006;10:396–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chin, BS, Han, SH, Lee, HS, et al. Risk factors for recurrent catheter-related infections after catheter-related bloodstream infections. Int J Infect Dis 2010;14:e16–e21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isguder, R, Devrim, I, Ceylan, G, Kara, A, Gulfidan, G, Agin, H. Risk factors for recurrent central-line–associated bloodstream infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. Turk J Med Sci 2017;47:1128–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermel, LA, Allon, M, Bouza, E, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:1–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raad, II, Sabbagh, MF. Optimal duration of therapy for catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a study of 55 cases and review. Clin Infect Dis 1992;14:75–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghanem, GA, Boktour, M, Warneke, C, et al. Catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in cancer patients: high rate of complications with therapeutic implications. Medicine (Baltimore) 2007;86:54–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Bustos, C, Aguinaga, A, Carmona-Torre, F, Del Pozo, JL. Long-term catheterization: current approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of port-related infections. Infect Drug Resist 2014;7:25–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Fowler, VG Jr., Justice, A, Moore, C, et al. Risk factors for hematogenous complications of intravascular catheter-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:695–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, KH, Lee, YM, Hong, HL, et al. Persistent catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia after catheter removal and initiation of antimicrobial therapy. PLoS One 2012;7:e46389.Google ScholarPubMed
Raad, I, Davis, S, Khan, A, Tarrand, J, Elting, L, Bodey, GP. Impact of central venous catheter removal on the recurrence of catheter-related coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:215–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Image

Lee et al. supplementary material

Lee et al. supplementary material 1

Download Lee et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 4.5 MB
Supplementary material: File

Lee et al. supplementary material

Lee et al. supplementary material 2

Download Lee et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.7 MB