Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:32:44.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clostridium difficile Infection and Limitations of Markers for Severity in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Michael S. Wang ,
Charlesnika T. Evans ,
Tulio Rodriguez ,
Dale N. Gerding  and
Stuart Johnson
Michael S. Wang*
Affiliation:
Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
Charlesnika T. Evans
Affiliation:
Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Center for Healthcare Studies, Chicago, Illinois
Tulio Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
Dale N. Gerding
Affiliation:
Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
Stuart Johnson
Affiliation:
Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
*
Lakeland Regional Medical Center, 1234 Napier Avenue, St. Joseph, MI 49085 (mwang@lakelandregional.org)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To describe characteristics of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and markers of severe CDI among patients with hematologic malignancies.

Design.

Case-control study.

Setting.

Tertiary care teaching hospital.

Patients and Methods.

Inpatients with hematologic malignancies and CDI were age and time matched with 2 control inpatients without hematologic malignancies. Chart reviews were performed, and C. difficile isolates were strain typed.

Results.

Case patients (n = 41) and control patients (n = 82) patients were different in respect to receipt of immunosuppressive agents within 2 months (92.7% vs 25.6%; P < .0001); neutropenia within 2 months (75.6% vs 3.7%; P < .0001) and mean (± standard deviation) white blood cell (WBC) count at diagnosis (4.9 ± 14.1 vs 11.8 ± 6.8 × 103 cells/mL; P = .0002); baseline mean creatinine level (0.89 ± 0.1 vs 1.6 ± 2.4 mg/dL; P = .003), mean creatinine level at diagnosis (0.83 ± 0.4 vs 1.85 ± 1.9 mg/dL; P = .004), and creatinine increases of 1.5 times over baseline (2.4% vs 15.1%; P = .02). Immunosuppressive agents and creatinine level remained significant in multivariable analysis (P = .03 for both variables). Severity correlated with mortality when measured by alternate severity criteria but not when measured by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria, which are based solely on WBC count and creatinine elevation. The prevalence of the epidemic BI/NAP1/027 strain was similar in both groups.

Conclusions.

Patients with hematologic malignancies had lower creatinine levels at the time of CDI diagnosis compared with control patients. WBC counts also tended to be lower in case patients. CDI severity criteria based on WBC count and creatinine level may not be applicable to patients with hematologic malignancies.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , February 2013 , pp. 127 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McDonald, CL, Killgore, GE, Thompson, A, et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile . N Engl J Med 2005;353:2433–2441.Google Scholar
2. Loo, VG, Poirier, L, Miller, MA, et al. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2442–2449.Google Scholar
3. Warny, M, Pepin, J, Fang, A, et al. Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet 2005;366:1079–1084.Google Scholar
4. McDonald, LC, Owings, M, Jernigan, DB. Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996-2003. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:409–415.Google Scholar
5. Johnson, S, Gerding, DN. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:1027–1036.Google Scholar
6. Dubberke, ER, Reske, KA, Yan, Y, Olsen, MA, McDonald, LC, Fraser, VJ. Clostridium difficile-associated disease in a setting of endemicity: identification of novel risk factors. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:1543–1549.Google Scholar
7. Palmore, TN, Sohn, S, Malak, SF, Eagan, J, Sepkowitz, KA. Risk factors for acquisition of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea among outpatients at a cancer hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:680–684.Google Scholar
8. Rojas, S, Cohen, SH, Tang, YJ, Wilson, J, Inciardi, J, Silva, J Jr. Differing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea between an oncology ward and a general medicine ward. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:14–15.Google Scholar
9. Pépin, J, Saheb, N, Coulombe, MA, et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolones as the predominant risk factor for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a cohort study during an epidemic in Quebec. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:1254–1260.Google Scholar
10. Clabots, CR, Johnson, S, Bettin, KM, et al. Development of a rapid and efficient restriction endonuclease analysis typing system for Clostridium difficile and correlation with other typing systems. J Clin Micro 1993;31:1870–1875.Google Scholar
11. Zar, FA, Srinivasa, R. Bakkanagari, SR, Moorth, KM. A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:302–307.Google Scholar
12. Belmares, J, Gerding, DN, Parada, JP, Miskevics, S, Weaver, F, Johnson, S. Outcome of metronidazole therapy for Clostridium difficile disease and correlation with a scoring system. J Infect 2007;55:495–501.Google Scholar
13. Cohen, SH, Gerding, DN, Johnson, S. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:431–455.Google Scholar
14. Biller, P, Shank, B, Lind, L. Moxifloxacin therapy as a risk factor for Clostridium difficile-associated disease during an outbreak: attempts to control a new epidemic strain. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;28:198–201.Google Scholar
15. Husain, A, Aptaker, L, Spriggs, DR, Barakat, RR. Gastrointestinal toxicity and Clostridium difficile diarrhea in patients treated with paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy regimens. Gynecol Oncol 1998;71:104–107.Google Scholar
16. Anand, A, Glatt, A. Clostridium difficile infection associated with antineoplastic chemotherapy: a review. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17:109–113.Google Scholar
17. Gifford, AH, Kirkland, KB. Risk factors for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea on an adult hematology-oncology ward. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006;25:751–755.Google Scholar
18. Kamboj, M, Khosa, P, Kaltsas, A, Babady, NE, Son, C, Sepkowitz, KA. Relapse versus reinfection: surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:1003–1006.Google Scholar
19. Black, SR, Weaver, KN, Jones, RC, et al. Clostridium difficile outbreak strain BI is highly endemic in Chicago area hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:897–902.Google Scholar
20. Miller, M, Gravel, D, Mulvey, M, et al. Health care-associated Clostridium difficile infection in Canada: patient age and infecting strain type are highly predictive of severe outcome and mortality. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:194–201.Google Scholar
21. Segal, BH, Freifeld, AG, Baden, LR, et al. Prevention and treatment of cancer-related infections. J Natl Compr Cane Netw 2008;6:122–174.Google Scholar
22. Alonso, CD, Treadway, SB, Hanna, DB, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of Clostridium difficile infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:1053–1063.Google Scholar
23. Fujitani, S, George, WL, Murthy, AR. Comparison of clinical severity score indices for Clostridium difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:220–228.Google Scholar