Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:32:02.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Efficacy of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Post-Cesarean Section Endometritis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Leigh Grossman Donowitz  and
Sandra M. Norris
Leigh Grossman Donowitz*
Affiliation:
Departments of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
Sandra M. Norris
Affiliation:
Departments of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
*
Department of Pediatrics, Box 386, University of Virginia, School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Endometritis is an infectious complication in 9% to 65% of patients delivered by cesarean section. The risk of developing endometritis is greater in the high-risk emergent patient as compared to routine repeat abdominal deliveries. This study describes the incidence of endometritis following cesarean section delivery in different patient groups at the University of Virginia Hospital during a 1-year period and reviews the literature on the efficacy and risks of prophylactic antibiotics in this setting. Of patients not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis, 11 (<1%) of 1,461 normal spontaneous vaginal delivery patients, 7 (16.7%) of 42 repeat and 39 (29.8%) of 131 emergent cesarean section patients developed endometritis. This contrasts to none of the 24 emergent patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis. The literature review shows multiple prospective well-designed and executed studies that demonstrate reliable decreases in the incidence of endometritis with short course antibiotic prophylaxis. Our conclusion is that short course antibiotic prophylaxis is a safe, reproducible, cost-effective and indicated method of reducing the incidence of this costly and serious postoperative infection.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , May 1985 , pp. 189 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Donowitz, LG, Wenzel, RP: Endometritis following cesarean section: A controlled study of the increased duration of hospital stay and direct cost of hospitalization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;137:467.Google Scholar
2.Swartz, WH, Grolle, K: The use of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section: A review of the literature. J Reprod Med 1981;26:595–609.Google Scholar
3.Kreutner, AK, Del Bene, VE, Delamar, Det al: Perioperative cephalosporin prophylaxis in cesarean section: Effect on endometritis in the high-risk patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;139:925–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Itskovitz, J, Paldi, E, Katz, M: The effect of prophylactic antibiotics on febrile morbidity following cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1979;53:162–165.Google Scholar
5.Stiver, HG, Forward, KR, Livingstone, RA, et al: Multicenter comparison of cefoxitin versus cefazolin for prevention of infectious morbidity after nonelective cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;145:158–163.Google Scholar
6.D'Angelo, LJ, Sokol, RJ: Short-versus long-course prophylactic antibiotic treatment in cesarean section patients. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55:583–586.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Apuzzio, JJ, Reyely, C, Pelosi, M, et al: Prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean section: Comparison of high- and low-risk patients for endomyometritis. Obstet Gynecol 1982;59:693–698.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Hawrylyshyn, PA, Berstein, P, Papsin, FR: Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk patients following cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;145:285–289.Google Scholar
9.Harger, JH, English, DH: Selection of patients for antibiotic prophylaxis cesarean sections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;141:752–758.Google Scholar
10.Dillon, WP, Seigel, MS, Lele, AS, et al: Evaluation of cefoxitin prophylaxis for cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1981;19:133–139.Google Scholar
11.Wong, R, Gee, CL, Ledger, WJ: Prophylactic use of cefazolin in monitored obstetric patients undergoing cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1978;51:407–411.Google Scholar
12.Long, WM, Rudd, EG, Dillon, MD: Intrauterine irrigation with cefa-mandole nafate solution at cesarean section: A preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;138:755–758.Google Scholar
13.Rudd, EG, Elwood, AC, Long, WH, et al: Prevention of endomyometritis using antibiotic irrigation during cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:413–416.Google Scholar
14.Flaherty, JF, Boswell, GW, Winkel, CA, et al: Pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin in patients at term gestation: Lavage versus intravenous administration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:760–765.Google Scholar
15.Kreutner, AK, Del Bene, VE, Delmar, D, et al: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1978;52:279–284.Google Scholar
16.Gibbs, RS, St. Clair, PJ, Castillo, MS, et al: Bacteriologie effects of antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1981;57:277–282.Google Scholar
17.Phelan, JP, Pruyn, SC: Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section: A double-blind study of cefazolin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;133:474–478.Google Scholar
18.Rothbard, MJ, Mayer, W, Wystepek, A, et al: Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1975;45:421–424.Google Scholar
19.Work, BA: Role of preventive antibiotics in patients undergoing cesarean section. South Med J 1977;70:44–45.Google Scholar
20.Duff, P, Park, RC: Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section in a military population. Milit Med 1980;6:377–381.Google Scholar
21.Green, SL, Sarubbi, FA, Bishop, EH: Prophylactic antibiotics in high-risk cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1978;51:569.Google Scholar
22.Moro, M, Andrews, M: Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1974;44:688.Google Scholar