Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:44:33.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postoperative Infections Following Cardiac Surgery: Association with an Environmental Reservoir in a Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Peter C. Dandalides ,
William A. Rutala  and
Felix A. Sarubbi Jr.
Peter C. Dandalides
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology, North Carolina Memorial Hospital, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
William A. Rutala*
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology, North Carolina Memorial Hospital, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Felix A. Sarubbi Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology, North Carolina Memorial Hospital, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
*
Hospital Epidemiology, Room 1001, North Carolina Memorial Hospital, Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During 1981, 39 nosocomial infections occurred in 27 of 223 patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the North Carolina Memorial Hospital. The peak attack rate (23.7%) occurred in August and September compared to 10.1% in January through July. A case-control study demonstrated that the only risk factor common to poor and stable health groups compared to controls was duration of stay in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU). Microbiologic studies of the environment, personnel and patients showed that colonization or infection of patients occurred 1 to 6 days after admission to the CTICU and that nosocomial pathogens were found: 1) in and around the unit's soiled utility sink, 2) in pooled handwashing cultures of unit personnel, and 3) on contaminated clean hands and air near the soiled utility sink, plus nearby bedside air only while the water in the sink was running. Environmental and personnel hand contamination by soiled utility sink aerosols likely contributed to these infections. Infection control measures, including discontinued use of the soiled utility sink, resulted in a significantly lower infection rate (5.6%).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 5 , Issue 8 , August 1984 , pp. 378 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Culliford, AT, Cunningham, JN Jr, Zeff, RHet al: Sternal and costochondral infections following open-heart surgery: A review of 2,594 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976;72:714–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Blakemore, WS, McGarrity, GJ, Thurer, RJ, et al: Infection by airborne bacteria with cardiopulmonary bypass. Surgery 1971;70:830–838.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Kluge, RM, Calia, FM, McLaughlin, JS, et al: Sources of contamination in open heart surgery. JAMA 1974;230:1415–1418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Rosendorf, LL, Daicoff, G, Baer, H, Sources of gram-negative infection after open-heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1974;67:195–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Centers for Disease Control: Algorithms for diagnosing infections. Am J Epidemiol 1980;111:635–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Lennette, EH, Balows, A, Hausler, WJ Jr, et al: Manual of Clinical Microbiology, ed 3. Washington, DC, American Society for Microbiology, 1980.Google Scholar
7.Wilson, MG, Nelson, RC, Phillips, LH, et al: New source of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a nursery. JAMA 1961;175:1146–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Whitby, JL, Rampling, A, Pseudomonas aeruginosa contamination in domestic and hospital environments. Lancet 1982;1:15–17.Google Scholar
9.Cross, DF, Benchimol, A, Dimond, EG, The faucet aerator—A source of Pseudomonas infection. N Engl J Med 1966;274:1430–1431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Fierer, J, Taylor, PM, Gezon, HM, Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic traced to delivery room resuscitators. N Engl J Med 1967;276:991–996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Kohn, J, A study of Pseudomonas pyocyanea cross infection in a burns unit. Preliminary report, in Wallace, AB, Wilkinson, AW (eds): Research in Burns. Edinburgh, E and S Livingstone, 1966, pp 486–500.Google Scholar
12.Holder, IA, Epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a burns hospital, in Young, VM (ed): Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Ecological Aspects and Patient Colonization. New York, Raven Press, 1977, pp 77–95.Google Scholar
13.Rutala, WA, Kennedy, VA, Loflin, HB, et al: Serratia marcescens nosocomial infections of the urinary tract associated with urine measuring containers and urinometers. Am J Med 1981;70:659–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed