Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:56:33.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surgical Outcome Information and the Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

James T. Lee*
Affiliation:
DVA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
*
Associate Chief of Surgery, DVA Medical Center, One Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN 55417

Abstract

There is increased media attention to healthcare outcome in the current reform atmosphere. Surgical care is a natural target for both print and electronic coverage. Hospital public relations departments often will be the interface with media representatives. Because surgical care outcome interpretation requires thoughtful evaluation of both single-patient and grouped-patient data, as well as knowledge of realistic risk-benefit ratios, it always is prudent to work with your local surgeon when the request for a story comes to the public relations department.

Type
Issues In Surgery
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Scheckler, W, Gaynes, R, Gross, P, et al. An approach to the evaluation of quality indicators of the outcome of care in hospitalized patients, with a focus on nosocomial infection indicators. Report of the Quality Indicator Study Group. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:308316.Google Scholar
2. Lee, J. Wound infection surveillance. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1992;6:643656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Lee, J. Wound infection surveillance for quality improvement. In: Fry, D, ed. Surgical Infections. New York, NY: Little Brown & Co; 1995.Google Scholar