Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T21:17:14.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When Should We Use Urine Cultures?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Walter E. Stamm*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
*
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104

Extract

Medicine and infectious disease textbooks have traditionally advised physicians to obtain urine cultures routinely before the initiation of therapy for presumed urinary tract infection. In practice, however, many physicians treat patients empirically, without doing a culture, and a recent cost-effectiveness analysis has supported this approach, at least in selected patients. What, then, are trie pros and cons of diagnostic urine cultures, and in which situations does current evidence favor their use?

Type
Special Sections
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Stamm, WE, Turck, M: Urinary tract infection, pyelonephritis, and related conditions, in Harrison's Principles of internal Medicine (10th Ed), 1983, pp 16491656.Google Scholar
2.Sobel, JD, Kaye, D: Urinary tract infections, in Principles and Practices of Infectious Diseases. (2nd Ed) 1985, pp 426451.Google Scholar
3.Carlson, KJ, Mulley, AG: Management of acute dysuria—A decision analysis model of alternative strategies. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102:244249.Google Scholar
4.Berg, AO, Heidrich, FE, Fihn, SD, et al: Establishing the cause of genitourinary symptoms in women in a family practice. JAMA 1984; 251:620625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Komaroff, AL: Acute dysuria in women. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:368374.Google Scholar
6.Latham, RH, Stamm, WE: Urethral syndrome in women. Urol Clin North Am 1984; 2:95101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Fihn, SD, Roberts, P, Stamm, WE: Clinical strategy to reduce the use of urine cultures in women with acute urinary symptoms. Clinical Research 1985; 33:250A.Google Scholar
8.Stamm, WE: Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections. West J Med 1982; 137:213220.Google Scholar
9.Stamm, WE: Prevention of urinary tract infections. Am J Med 1984; 76(Suppl):148154.Google Scholar
10.Urinary tract infection during pregnancy. Lancet 1985; 2:190192.Google Scholar
11.Chodak, GW, Plant, ME: Systemic antibiotics for prophylaxis in urologic surgery: A critical review. J Urol 1979; 121:695708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Morrow, LC, Hierholzer, WJ, Lee, RV: Yale studies of patient care. II. The use of urine culture in the management of urinary tract infections. Yale J Bio Med 1976; 49:341–340.Google Scholar
13.Schultz, HJ, McCoffrey, LA, Keys, TI.et al: Acute cystitis: A prospective study of laboratory tests and duration of therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 6:391397.Google Scholar
14.Stamm, WE, Counts, GW, Running, KR, et al: Diagnosis of coliform infection in acutely dysuric women. N Engl J Med 1982; 307:463468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Stark, RP, Maki, DG: Bacteriuria in the catheterized patient: What quantitative level of bacteriuria is relevant? N Engl J Med 1984; 311:960964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Pezzlo, M: Detection of bacteriuria by automated methods. Laboratory Medicine 1984; 15:539543.Google Scholar
17.Latham, RH, Wong, ES, Larson, A, et al: Laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection in ambulatory women. JAMA to be published.Google Scholar
18.Diafuten, R, Zeleznik, D, Stamm, WE: Detection of bacteriuria and pyuria with the Bac-T-Screen bacteriuria detection device. Progress in and Abstracts of the Twenty-fourth ICCAC 1984. #1072.Google Scholar