Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T09:54:42.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deep Infection after Total Hip Replacement: A Method for National Incidence Surveillance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Viktor Lindgren ,
Max Gordon ,
Per Wretenberg ,
Johan Kärrholm  and
Göran Garellick
Viktor Lindgren*
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Orthopaedics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Registercentrum Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
Max Gordon
Affiliation:
Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Registercentrum Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Per Wretenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Orthopaedics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Johan Kärrholm
Affiliation:
Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Registercentrum Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Göran Garellick
Affiliation:
Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Registercentrum Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Department of Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden (viktor.lindgren@karolinska.se).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence of deep periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after primary total hip replacement (THR) in Sweden prior to the introduction of a national initiative to reduce these infections.

Design.

Prospective open cohort study with 2 years follow-up of each subject.

Setting.

All THR-performing clinics in Sweden.

Methods.

All patients registered for a primary THR in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register between July 1, 2005, and December 31, 2008, were selected for the study (45,531 patients with 49,219 THRs) and were matched with the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. All patients with a minimum of 4 weeks of continuous outpatient antibiotic treatment within 2 years after their primary THR (1,989 patients with 2,219 THRs) were selected for a medical records review, and the number of cases with PJI was determined.

Results.

The cumulative incidence of PJI within 2 years after primary THR was 0.9% (95% confidence interval, 0.85–1.02; n = 443), and 405 of these had been reoperated. The incidence rate of PJI for the first 3 months was 5 per 10,000 THR-weeks and, thereafter, 0.3 per 10,000 THR-weeks. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most common bacteria isolated.

Conclusions.

This study describes a new method of national postoperative infection surveillance. The incidence is similar to previous smaller reports and is useful for monitoring changes over time to evaluate the national initiative to reduce infections.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 35 , Issue 12 , December 2014 , pp. 1491 - 1496
Copyright
© 2014 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bozic, KJ, Kurtz, SM, Lau, E, Ong, K, Vail, TP, Berry, DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(1):128–133.Google Scholar
2. Klouche, S, Sariali, E, Mamoudy, P. Total hip arthroplasty revision due to infection: a cost analysis approach. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;96(2):124–132.Google Scholar
3. Kurtz, SM, Lau, E, Watson, H, Schmier, JK, Parvizi, J. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(8 suppl):61–65.e1.Google Scholar
4. de Lissovoy, G, Fraeman, K, Hutchins, V, Murphy, D, Song, D, Vaughn, BB. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control 2009;37(5):387–397.Google Scholar
5. Koyonos, L, Zmistowski, B, Della Valle, CJ, Parvizi, J. Infection control rate of irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop 2011;469(11):3043–3048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Crockarell, JR, Hanssen, AD, Osmon, DR, Morrey, BF. Treatment of infection with debridement and retention of the components following hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80(9):1306–1313.Google Scholar
7. Zimmerli, W, Ochsner, PE. Management of infection associated with prosthetic joints. Infection 2003;31(2):99–108.Google Scholar
8. Giulieri, SG, Graber, P, Ochsner, PE, Zimmerli, W. Management of infection associated with total hip arthroplasty according to a treatment algorithm. Infection 2004;32(4):222–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Urquhart, DM, Hanna, FS, Brennan, SL, et al. Incidence and risk factors for deep surgical site infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 2010;25(8):1216–1222.e3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Ong, KL, Kurtz, SM, Lau, E, Bozic, KJ, Berry, DJ, Parvizi, J. Prosthetic joint infection risk after total hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(6 suppl):105–109.Google Scholar
11. Adeli, B, Parvizi, J. Strategies for the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94(11 suppl A):42–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Jamsen, E, Furnes, O, Engesaeter, LB, et al. Prevention of deep infection in joint replacement surgery. Acta Orthop 2010;81(6):660–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Garellick, G, Karrholm, J, Rogmark, C, Herberts, P. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty: Annual Report 2010. Gothenburg: Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, 2010. http://www.shpr.se/Libraries/Documents/AnnualReport-2010-2-eng.sflb.ashx.Google Scholar
14. Stridh Ekman, G, Ringback Weitoft, G, Nyren, O, Dickman, PW, Ericsson, O, Struwe, J. National surveillance of surgical-site infection through register-based analysis of antibiotic use after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2010;97(11):1722–1729.Google Scholar
15. Christensson, B, Johansson, L, Nilsdotter, Å, et al. Vårdprogram för Led-Och Skelettinfektioner. 2008. http://infektion.net/sites/default/files/pdf/Vardprogram_led_och_skelett_2008.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2014.Google Scholar
16. Parvizi, J, Zmistowski, B, Berbari, EF, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop 2011;469(11):2992–2994.Google Scholar
17. Bernard, L, Lubbeke, A, Stern, R, et al. Value of preoperative investigations in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection: retrospective cohort study and literature review. Scand J Infect Dis 2004;36(6/7):410–416.Google Scholar
18. Malekzadeh, D, Osmon, DR, Lahr, BD, Hanssen, AD, Berbari, EF. Prior use of antimicrobial therapy is a risk factor for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop 2010;468(8):2039–2045.Google Scholar
19. Parvizi, J, Jacovides, C, Zmistowski, B, Jung, KA. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection: is there a consensus? Clin Orthop 2011;469(11):3022–3030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Oussedik, S, Gould, K, Stockley, I, Haddad, FS. Defining peri-prosthetic infection: do we have a workable gold standard? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94(11):1455–1456.Google Scholar
21. Kurtz, SM, Lau, E, Schmier, J, Ong, KL, Zhao, K, Parvizi, J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2008;23(7):984–991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Phillips, CB, Barrett, JA, Losina, E, et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85A(1):20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Bolon, MK, Hooper, D, Stevenson, KB, et al. Improved surveillance for surgical site infections after orthopedic implantation procedures: extending applications for automated data. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48(9):1223–1229.Google Scholar
24. Pulido, L, Ghanem, E, Joshi, A, Purtill, JJ, Parvizi, J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop 2008;466(7):1710–1715.Google Scholar
25. Phillips, JE, Crane, TP, Noy, M, Elliott, TS, Grimer, RJ. The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital: a 15-year prospective survey. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(7):943–948.Google Scholar