Article contents
Does the Composition of Urinary Catheters Influence Clinical Outcomes and the Results of Research Studies?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0195941700045756/resource/name/firstPage-S0195941700045756a.jpg)
- Type
- Letters to the Editor
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007
References
1.
Srinivasan, A, Karchemer, T, Richards, A, Song, X, Perl, T. A prospective trial of a novel, silicone-based, silver-coated Foley catheter for the prevention of nosocomial urinary tract infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
2006;27:38–43.Google Scholar
2.
Johnson, JR, Kuskowski, MA, Wilt, TJ. Systematic review: antimicrobial urinary catheters to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients. Ann Intern Med
2006;144:116–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.
Liedberg, H, Lundeberg, T, Ekman, P. Refinements in the coating of urethral catheters reduces the incidence of catheter-associated bacteriuria. An experimental and clinical study. Eur Urol
1990;17:236–240.Google Scholar
4.
Leidberg, H, Lundberg, T. Silver alloy coated catheters reduce catheter associated bacteriuria. Br J Urol
1990;65:379–381.Google Scholar
5.
Leidberg, H, Lundeberg, T. Prospective study of incidence of urinary tract infection in patients catheterized with Bard hydrogel and silver-coated catheters or Bard hydrogel-coated catheters (abstract). J Urol
1993;149:405A.Google Scholar
6.
Verleyen, P, DeRidder, D, Poppel, HV, Baert, L. Clinical application of the Bardex 1C Foley catheter. Eur Urol
1999;36:240–246.Google Scholar
7.
Maki, DG, Knasinski, V, Halvorson, KT, Tambyah, PA. A novel silver hydrogel urinary catheter reduces catheter-associated urinary tract infections. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial (abstract). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
1998;19:682.Google Scholar
8.
Thibon, P, Le Coutour, X, Leroyer, R, Fabry, J. Randomized multi-centre trial of the effects of a catheter coated with hydrogel and silver salts on the incidence of hospital acquired urinary tract infections. J Hosp Infect
2000;45:117–124.Google Scholar
9.
Karchmer, TB, Giannetta, ET, Muto, CA, Strain, BA, Farr, BM. A randomized crossover study of silver-coated urinary catheters in hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med
2000;160:3294–3298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.
Ferrie, BG, Groome, J, Sethia, B, Kirk, D. Comparison of silicone and latex catheters in the development of urethral stricture after cardiac surgery. Brit J Urol
1986;58:549–550.Google Scholar
11.
Wise, HA II, Engel, RME, Whitaker, RH. Treatment of urethral strictures. J Urol
1972;107:269–272.Google Scholar
12.
Cox, AJ, Hukins, DWL, Sutton, TM. Infection of catheterised patients: bacterial colonisation of encrusted Foley catheters shown by scanning electron microscopy. Urol Res
1989;17:349–352.Google Scholar
13.
Ruutu, M, Alfthan, O, Talja, M, Andersson, LC. Cytotoxicity of latex urinary catheters. Brit J Urol
1985;57:82–87.Google Scholar
14.
Edwards, LE, Lock, R, Powell, C, Jones, P. Post-catheterisation urethral strictures: a clinical and experimental study. Brit J Urol
1983;55:53–56.Google Scholar
15.
Nacey, JN, Tulloch, AGS, Ferguson, AF. Catheter-induced urethritis: a comparison between latex and silicone catheters in a prospective clinical trial. Brit J Urol
1985;57:325–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.
Kunin, CM, Chin, QF, Chambers, S. Formation of encrustations on indwelling urinary catheters in the elderly: a comparison of different types of catheter materials in “blockers” and “non-blockers.” J Urol
1987;138:899–902.Google Scholar
- 16
- Cited by