Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:47:18.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management of an Outbreak of Clostridium difficile–Associated Disease Among Geriatric Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

S. Cherifi ,
M. Delmee ,
J. Van Broeck ,
I. Beyer ,
B. Byl  and
G. Mascart
S. Cherifi*
Affiliation:
Departments of Internal Medicine, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
M. Delmee
Affiliation:
Microbiology Unit, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
J. Van Broeck
Affiliation:
Microbiology Unit, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
I. Beyer
Affiliation:
Geriatrics, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
B. Byl
Affiliation:
Infection Control Unit, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
G. Mascart
Affiliation:
Microbiology, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium Infection Control Unit, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
*
Hôpital Universitaire Brugmann, Place A. Van Gehuchten, 4, 1020 Brussels, Belgium (soraya.cherifi@chu-brugmann.be)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To describe a nosocomial outbreak of Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD).

Design.

A traditional outbreak investigation.

Setting.

Geriatric department of a tertiary care teaching hospital from March through April 2003.

Methods.

The outbreak was detected by the C. difficile surveillance program of the infection control unit. CDAD was diagnosed by stool culture and fecal toxin A detection with a qualitative rapid immunoassay. Isolates of C difficile were serotyped and genotyped using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Results.

The incidence of CDAD increased from 27 cases per 100,000 patient-days in the 6-month period before the outbreak to 99 cases per 100,000 patient-days during the outbreak. This outbreak involved 21 of 92 patients in 4 geriatric wards, which were located at 2 geographically distinct sites and staffed by the same medical team. The mean age of patients was 83 years (range, 71-100 years). Five (24%) of the 21 patients had community-acquired diarrhea, and secondary hospital transmission resulted in 3 clusters involving 16 patients. Serotyping and genotyping were performed on isolates in stool specimens from 19 different patients; 16 of these isolates were serotype A1, whereas 3 displayed profiles different from the outbreak strain. Management of this outbreak consisted in reinforcement of contact isolation precautions for patients with diarrhea, cohorting of infected patients in the same ward, and promotion of hand hygiene. Relapses occurred in 6 (29%) of 21 patients.

Conclusion.

Control of this rapidly developing outbreak of CDAD was obtained with early implementation of cohorting and ward closure and reinforcement of environmental disinfection, hand hygiene, and enteric isolation precautions.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 27 , Issue 11 , November 2006 , pp. 1200 - 1205
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McFarland, LV, Mulligan, ME, Kwork, RY, Stamm, WE. Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:204–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Wilcox, MH, Smyth, ET. Incidence and impact of Clostridium difficile infection in the UK, 1993-1996. J Hosp Infect 1998; 39:181–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Wilcox, MH. Clostridium difficile—setting the scene. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;41(Suppl C):1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Cartmill, TD, Panigrahi, H, Worsley, MA, McCann, DC, Nice, CN, Keith, E. Management and control of a large outbreak of diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile . J Hosp Infect 1995; 29:75–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Djuretic, T, Wall, PG, Brazzier, JS. Clostridium difficile: an update on its epidemiology and role in hospital outbreaks in England and Wales. J Hosp Infect 1999; 41:213–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Johnson, S, Samore, MH, Farrow, KA, et al. Epidemics of diarrhea caused by a clindamycin-resistant strain of Clostridium difficile in four hospitals. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1645–1651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Sanderson, P, Richardson, D. Do patients with Clostridium difficile need to be isolated? J Hosp Infect 1997; 36:157–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. George, WL, Sutter, VL, Citron, D, Finegold, SM. Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile . J Clin Microbiol 1979; 9:214–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Whittier, S, Shapiro, DS, Kelly, WF, Walden, TP, Wait, KJ, McMillon, LT. Evaluation of four commercially available enzyme immunoassays for laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile–associated diseases. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:2861–2865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Delmée, M, Homel, M, Wauters, G. Serogrouping of Clostridium difficile strains by slide agglutination. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 21:323–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Delmée, M, Laroche, Y, Avesani, V, Cornelis, G. Comparison of serogrouping and Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile . J Clin Microbiol 1986; 24:991–994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Spencer, RC. The role of antimicrobial agents in the aetiology of Clostridium difficile–associated disease. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;41(Suppl D):21–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. MacGowan, AP, Brown, I, Feeny, R, et al. Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea and length of hospital stay. J Hosp Infect 1995; 31:241–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Riley, TV, Codde, JP, Rouse, IL. Increased length of stay due to Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea. Lancet 1995; 345:455–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Teasley, DG, Gerding, DN, Olson, MM, et al. Prospective randomized trial of metronidazole versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea and colitis. Lancet 1983; 2:1043–1046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Gerding, DN, Johnson, S, Peterson, LR, Mulligan, ME, Silva, J Jr. Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea and colitis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995; 16:459–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Samore, MH, Venkataraman, L, DeGirolami, PC, Arbeit, RD, Karchmer, AW. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of sporadic and clustered cases of nosocomial Clostridium difficile diarrhoea. Am J Med 1996; 100:32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wilcox, MH, Fawley, WN, Wigglesworth, N, Parnell, P, Verity, P, Freeman, J. Comparison of the effect of detergent versus hypochlorite cleaning on environmental contamination and incidence of Clostridium difficile infection. J Hosp Infect 2003; 54:109–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Khan, R, Cheesbrough, J. Impact of changes in antibiotic policy on Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhoea (CDAD) over a five-year period in a district general hospital. J Hosp Infect 2003; 54:104–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar