Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T05:03:04.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zero Infection Rate: An Achievable Irreducible Minimum in Clean Surgery?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Allen B. Kaiser*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, St. Thomas Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
*
Department of Medicine, St. Thomas Hospital, P.O. Box 380, Nashville, TN 37202

Extract

For clean elective surgery, the goal of nosocomial infection control is nothing less than an infection rate of zero. Although infection rates of less than 1% are being posted regularly in selected surgical operations today, infection rates of 2% to 6% persist in many procedures such as coronary artery bypass surgery and vascular surgery. Predictable achievement of a zero infection rate in all of clean surgery will require new directions in both basic and clinical research.

Research into the prevention of infection in clean surgery has, to date, focused upon 1) identifying and controlling the routes of wound contamination, 2) decontamination of a contaminated wound through the prophylactic use of antimicrobials, and 3) modifying the host immune system. The latter is a fascinating area of new research which will not be discussed in detail here.

Routes of contamination are often categorized as endogenous or exogenous. “Endogenous” generally refers to bacterial seeding of the wound from the flora of the patient's own skin, nose, perineum, and GI tract. “Exogenous” contamination has come to mean bacteria originating from the operating room environment or operating room personnel which reach the wound by direct inoculation (eg, improperly sterilized instruments, hands of the surgeon via torn gloves) or by the airborne route. These categories may not be broad enough to satisfy the complexities of the hospital environment, however. The addition of the category “acquired endogenous” may be of help in describing contamination which occurs when patients become colonized with resistant hospital flora and subsequently carry this newly acquired flora into the operating theater.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bucknall, TE: Factors affecting the development of surgical wound infections: A surgeon's view. J Hosp Infect 1985; 6:18.Google Scholar
2.Strachan, C: Antibiotic prophylaxis in “clean” surgical procedures. World J Surg 1982; 6:273280.Google Scholar
3.Chodak, GW, Plaut, ME: Use of systemic antibiotics for prophylaxis in surgery: A critical review. Arch Surg 1977; 112:326334.Google Scholar
4.Cruse, PJE, Foord, R: The epidemiology of wound infection: A ten-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1980; 60:2740.Google Scholar
5.Evans, M, Pollock, AV: Trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. Arch Surg 1984; 119:109113.Google Scholar
6.Meakins, JL, Christou, NV, Shiggal, HM, et al: Therapeutic approaches to anergy in surgical patients. Ann Surg 1979; 190:286295.Google Scholar
7.Lidwell, OM, Lowbury, EJL, Whyte, W, et al: Effect of ultra clean air in operating room on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: A randomized study. Br Med J 1982; 285:1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kaiser, AB, Clayson, KR, Mulherin, JL Jr, et al: Antibiotic prophylaxis in vascular surgery. Ann Surg 1978; 188:283289.Google Scholar
9.Kaiser, AB: Effective and creative surveillance and reporting of surgical wound infections. Infect Control 1982; 3:4143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Goldmann, DA, Hopkins, CC, Karchmer, AW, et al: Cephalothin prophylaxis in cardiac valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 73:470479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Dandalides, PC, Rutala, WA, Sarubbi, FA Jr: Postoperative infections following cardiac surgery: Association with an environmental reservoir in a cardio-thoracic intensive care unit. Infect Control 1984; 5:378384.Google Scholar
12.Krieger, JN, Wenzel, RP: Nosocomial urinaiy tract infections cause wound infections postoperatively in surgical patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983; 156:313318.Google Scholar