Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:26:55.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Survey of Observational Techniques and Hipparcos Reanalysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Jan Vondrák
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Boční II, 141 31 Prague 4, Czech Republic
Cyril Ron
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Boční II, 141 31 Prague 4, Czech Republic
Ivan Pešek
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University, Thákurova 7, 166 29 Prague 6, Czech Republic

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Polar motion and Universal Time have been regularly determined since 1899 and 1956, respectively, at a number of observatories all over the world. Before the International Earth Rotation Service (IERS) was established in 1988, the classical astrometry instruments such as visual zenith-telescopes, PZTs, transit instruments, astrolabes etc. were used. The survey of all these instruments and the methods of observation used is described. The values of instantaneous latitude and UT0-UTC made at a set of selected observatories and based on individual star observations have been collected at the Astronomical Institute in Prague during the past years. They were recalculated using the most recent astronomical standards and the Hipparcos Catalogue, and used to determine the Earth orientation parameters (polar motion, celestial pole offsets and Universal Time). The most recent solution, based on about 4.5 million observations with 47 different instruments at 33 observatories, is described and the results of polar motion presented.

Type
Part 3. Observational Techniques for Polar Motion
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

References

Argus, D.F., & Gordon, R.G. 1991, Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESA, 1997, The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues, ESA SP-1200.Google Scholar
Gross, R.S., & Vondrák, J. 1999, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hefty, J. 1991, in Journées 1991 Systèmes de Référence Spatio-Temporels N. Capitaine, Observatoire de Paris, 1991, 217.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, J., Lindegren, L., Perryman, M.A.C., Hemenway, P.D., Johnston, K.J., Kislyuk, V.S., Lestrade, J.F., Morrison, L.V., Platais, L, Röser, S., Schilbach, E., Tucholke, H.-J., de Vegt, C., Vondrák, J., Arias, F., Gontier, A.M., Arénou, F., Brosche, P., Florkowski, D.R., Garrington, S.T., Preston, R.A., Ron, C., Rybka, S.P., Scholz, R.-D., Zacharias, N., 1997, A&A, 323, 620.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D.D. 1996, IERS Conventions, IERS Technical Note, 21.Google Scholar
McNally, D. (ed.) 1990, Transactions of the IAU XXB, Kluwer, 198.Google Scholar
Pešek, I. 1992, A&A, 262, 621.Google Scholar
Scherneck, H.-G. 1995, priv. comm.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J. 1977, Bull. Astron. Inst. CzechosL, 28, 84.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J. 1991, Bull. Astron. Inst. CzechosL, 42, 283.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J. 1999, Surveys in Geophysics, 20, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vondrák, J., Pešek, I., Ron, C., & Čepek, A. 1998, Publications of the Astronomical Institute, Acad. Sci. Czech R., 87, 1.Google Scholar
Yaya, P., Bizouard, C. & Ron, C. 2000, this volume.Google Scholar
Yoder, C.F., Williams, J.G., & Parke, M.E. 1981, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar