Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:38:23.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Timing noise as a source of discrepancy between timing and VLBI pulsar positions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

A. E. Rodin
Affiliation:
PRAO ASC LPI, Pushchino, Moscow region, 142292, Russia
Yu. P. Ilyasov
Affiliation:
PRAO ASC LPI, Pushchino, Moscow region, 142292, Russia
V. V. Oreshko
Affiliation:
PRAO ASC LPI, Pushchino, Moscow region, 142292, Russia
M. Sekido
Affiliation:
KSRC CRL, 893-1, Hirai, Kashima, Ibaraki, 314, Japan

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Pulsar positions obtained by VLBI and timing are compared. The difference between these positions is proven to be mainly due to timing noise. A new method which significantly reduces the difference have been developed.

Type
Part 2. Timing, General Relativity and Astrometry
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

References

Doroshenko, O.V., & Kopeikin, S.M. 1990, Sov. Astr., 34, 496.Google Scholar
Downs, G.S., Reichly, P.E. 1983, ApJ, 53, 169.Google Scholar
Fomalont, E.B., Goss, W.G., Lyne, A.G., Manchester, R. N., R.N., , & Justtanont, K. 1992, MNRAS, 258, 497.Google Scholar
Ilyasov, Yu. P., Potapov, V.A., & Rodin, A.E. 1999, This proceedings.Google Scholar
Rodin, A.E. 2000, PhD thesis, P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.H., & Weisberg, J.M. 1989, ApJ, 345, 434.Google Scholar