No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Utilitarianism and the question of free labor in Russia and India, in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2020
Abstract
Liberal utilitarianism is usually presented as a current of thought mostly inspired by Jeremy Bentham and other Western European thinkers, and eventually diffused in other parts of the world. This paper adopts a different approach and shows, on the one hand, how the Bentham brothers’ experiences in Russia and serfdom in particular inspired their invention of the Panopticon. The latter was not related to deviance (Foucault's interpretation), but to labor organization and surveillance. On the other hand, the interplay between utilitarianism and colonial India led Bentham, then James and John Stuart Mill, and ultimately Henry Maine to revise utilitarianism, in particular the relationship between law, labor, and political economy. In both the Britain–Russia interplay and Britain–India interplay, the tension between universalism and particularism of philosophical, social and economic categories was at work.
- Type
- Featured Essays on the History of Political Economy in Asia and Europe
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Aleksandrov, Viktor A. (1976). Sel'skaia obshchina v Rossii, XVIII–nachalo XIXe veka [The agrarian commune in Russia, eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Allen, Richard (2009). “Suppressing a Nefarious Traffic: Britain and the Abolition of Slave-Trading in India and the Western Indian Ocean, 1770–1830.” William and Mary Quarterly 66:4, pp. 873–94.Google Scholar
Bairoch, Paul (1997). Victoires et déboires: histoire économique et sociale du monde du XVIe siècle à nos jours. 3 volumes, Paris.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Tapas Kumar (1963). Background to Indian Criminal Law. Calcutta: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Bayly, Christopher A. (2004). The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bayly, Christopher A. (2011). Recovering Liberties. Indian Thought in the Age of Liberalism and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedekar, D. K. ed (1969). Char June Marathi Arthashastriya Granth. Pune: Gokhale Institute of Economics and Politics.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Robert (1988). The Overthrow of Colonial Slavery, 1776–1848. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Blakely, Allison (1993). “American Influences on Russian Reformists in the Era of the French Revolution.” Russian Review 52, 4, pp. 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, H. V. (2006). The Business of Empire: The East India Company and Imperial Britain, 1756–1833. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Joseph (1982). “The Moscow Workhouse and Urban Welfare Reform in Russia.” Russian Review 41:4, pp. 427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British India Society (1839). British India: The Duty and Interests of Great Britain, to Consider the Condition and Claims of her Possessions in the East: Addresses Delivered Before the Members of the Society of Friends, at Their Yearly Meeting, Devonshire House, Bishopsgate Street, on the 1st of June, 1839. London: Johnston and Barrett.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers, 1831–2, XIV, 16 Feb 1832.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers, Slavery in India, 1828 (125).Google Scholar
Bruk, S. I. and Kabuzan, V. M. (1984). “Migratsiia naseleniia v Rossii v XVIII-nachale XX veka” (Migration of population in Russia, 18th-early 19th centuries), Istoriia SSSR 4, pp. 42–59.Google Scholar
Brunon-Ernst, Anne in “When Foucault Reads Bentham,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Berlin, 25 July 2007, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p178059_index.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbank, Jane and Cooper, Frederick (2010). Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campos Boralevi, Lea (1984). Bentham and the Oppressed. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, Indrani and Eaton, Richard (eds) (2006). Slavery and South Asian History. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Christie, Ian R. (1970). “Samuel Bentham and the Western Colony at Krichev, 1784–1787.” Slavonic and East European Review 48:111, pp. 232–47.Google Scholar
Confino, Michael (1963). Domaines et seigneurs en Russie vers la fin du XVIIIe siècle: Étude de structures agraires et de mentalités économiques. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Confino, Michael (1969). Systèmes agraires et progrès agricole en Russie aux XVIIIe–XIXe siècles: Étude d’ économie et de sociologie rurales. Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimmins, James (1997). “Jeremy Bentham and Daniel O'Connell: Their Correspondence and Radical Alliance, 1828–1831.” Historical Journal, 40:2, p. 365.Google Scholar
Cross, Anthony G. (1997). By the Banks of the Neva: Chapters From the Lives and Careers of the British in Eighteenth-Century Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, John (2007). After Tamerlane. The Rise and Fall of Global Empires, 1400–2000. London: Penguin Book.Google Scholar
Davis, David Brion (1999). The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
den Otter, Sandra (2012). “Law, Authority and Colonial Rule.” In India and the British Empire India and the British Empire, eds, Peers, Douglas and Gooptu, Nandini, pp. 168–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drescher, Seymour (2009). Abolitions. A History of Slavery and Antislavery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, C. D. (1873). The Law of Evidence in British India. 2nd edition, Calcutta, preface.Google Scholar
Fischer-Tiné, Harald and Mann, Michael (eds) (2004). Colonialism as Civilizing Mission. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert (1994). Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of American Slavery. New York: Norton, vol 1, pp. 203–4.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1985). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Paris, 1975, and English translation by A. Sheridan for Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Golitsyn, Mikhail (1839). Polozhenie dlia krest'ian Efremo vskoi votchiny sela Mikhailovskogo derevni Varvarovki 1839g.” [The conditions of peasants of the estate Efremovskii, village of Varvarovki, in 1839], in Materialy dlia istorii votchonnogo upravleniia v Rossii, ed. M. V. Dovnar-Zapol'skii (Kiev: tipography Imperatorskogo Universiteta, n.d.), pp. 276–80.Google Scholar
Grey, C. E. and Ryan, E. (1831). “Some Observations on a Suggestion of a Code of Law,” submitted 13 September 1830 to the Governor-General in Council. Bentick to Grey and Ryan, 9 October 1831, British Parliamentary Papers (1831) VI, 144.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit (1983). Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gwyn, Campbell and Stanziani, Alessandro (2013). Debt and Bondage in the Indian Ocean, 18th-21st centuries. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, 3rd series.Google Scholar
Hatekar, Neeraj (2003). “Empire and the Economist: Analysis of 19th Century Economic Writings in Maharashtra.” Economic and Political Weekly 38:5, pp. 469–79.Google Scholar
Hay, Douglas (1975). Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth Century England. London: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Hoch, Steven and Augustine, William (1979). “The Tax Censuses and the Decline of the Serf Population in Imperial Russia, 1833–1858.” Slavic Review 38:3, pp. 208–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Marshall (1993). Rethinking World History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Commons (1773). “Extract of the Proceedings of the Committee at Kishan Nugar (June 28, 1772),” in Seventh Report from the Committee of Secrecy (May 6, 1773), in House of Commons Sessional Papers of the Eighteenth Century 348 (Sheila Lambert ed. 1975) (hereinafter ‘Seventh Report’).Google Scholar
Innes, Johanna (2002). “Governing Diverse Societies.” In The Eighteenth Century 1688–1815, ed. Langford, Paul, pp. 103–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Eric (1981). The European Miracle: Environment, Economies and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, William (1970). The Letters of Sir William Jones edited by Garland Cannon, 2 vols., Oxford, In particular: Jones to Arthur Lee, 1st October 1786 II: 712.Google Scholar
Keshvaji, Hari and Mandlik, V. N. (1854). Deshvyavaharyvavastha ya shastrachi multatve. Mumbai: Ganapat Krishnaji's Press, reprinted in D K Bedekar.Google Scholar
Klier, John (1986). Russia Gathers Her Jews: The Origins of the Jewish Question in Russia, 1772–1825 Dekalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Kolchin, Peter (1987). Unfree Labor: American Slavery and Russian Serfdom. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kollmann, Nancy Shields (2017). The Russian Empire, 1450–1801. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolsky, Elizabeth (2010). Colonial Justice in British India: White Violence and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kooiman, Dick (1991). “Conversion From Slavery to Plantation Labor: Christian Mission in South India, Nineteenth Century.” Social Scientist, 19:8/9, pp. 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Dharma (1993). “Colonialism, Bondage, and Caste in British India.” In Breaking the Chains. Slavery, Bondage, and Emancipation in Modern Africa and Asia. ed. Klein, Martin, pp. 112–130. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Daniel (1989). The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteenth Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomonosov, Mikhail (1766). Drevnaia Rossiskaia istoriia ot nachala rossiskogo naroda do konchiny velikogo kniazia Iaroslava Pervogo ili do 1054 goda (Ancient Russian history since the beginning to the great prince of Iaroslav) Saint-Petersburg: Akademiia Nauka.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas (1867). Speeches and Poems with the Report and Notes on the Indian Penal Code. New York: Riverside Press.Google Scholar
Maine, Henri (2013). Ancient Law, its Connections with the Early History of Society, and its Relation to Modern Ideas. Createspace: Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
Major, Andrea (2012). Slavery, Abolitionism and Empire in India, 1772–1843. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantena, Karuna (2010). Alibis of Empire. Henri Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Virginia (2001). Law and Custom in the Steppe: The Kazakhs of the Middle Horde and Russian Colonialism in the Nineteenth Century. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
McKinlay, Alain and Starkey, Ken eds (1998). Foucault, Management and Organization Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of Self. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mehta, Uday Singh (1999). Liberalism and Empire. A Study in Nineteenth Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, James (1858). The History of British India. London: James Madden, 1st edition: 1817.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1984). “Essays on Equality, Law, & Education.” In Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, eds, Robson, John, Collini, Stefano, p. 83, vol. 21. Original 1825, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Aleksei ed. (2004). Rossiiskaia imperiia v sravnitel´noi perspektive: Sbornik statei. Moscow: Novoe izdatel´stvo.Google Scholar
Moir, Martin, Peers, Douglas, and Zastoupil, Lynn (eds), (1999). J.S. Mill Encounter with India. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montefiore, Simon Sebag (2001). Prince of Princes: The Life of Potemkin. London: Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
Montefiore, Simon Sebag (2003). “Prince Potemkin and the Benthams: The Project to Create an English Village with Modern Factories in Belorussia.” History Today 52:8, pp. 38–43.Google Scholar
Moore, Robin (1999). “John Stuart Mill and Royal India.” In J.S. Mill's Encounters, ed. Alii, Moir, pp. 87–110.Google Scholar
Mordvinov, Nikolai S. (1815). “Nekotoriia soobrazheniia po predmetu manufaktur v Rossii i o tarife.” [Some observations on Russian manufactures and the tariffs], Zhurnal Departamenta Gosudarstvennoi ekonomiki 14:pp. 282–303, 345–388.Google Scholar
Moriakov, V. I. (1981). Iz istorii evoliutsii obshchestvenno-politicheskikh vzgliadov prosvetitelei kontsa XVIII veka: Reinal’ i Radishchev (On the history of the evolution of the social-political approaches during the 18th century, Raynal and Radishchev) (Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta).Google Scholar
Morrison, Alexander S. (2008). Russian Rule in Samarkand, 1868–1910: A Comparison with British India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morriss, Roger (2015). Science, Utility, and Maritime Power. Samuel Bentham in Russia, 1779–1791. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Daniel (2016). Edmund Burke and the Conservative Logic of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Kelly (2017). Claiming Crimea. A History of Catherine the Great's Southern Empire. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterhammel, Jürgen (2014). The Transformation of the World. A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu (1994). “The Narrowness of Liberalism From Mill to Ralws.” Times Literary Supplement, pp. 11–13.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer (2005). A Turn to Empire. The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeranz, Kenneth (2000). The Great Divergence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Gyan (1990). Bonded Histories. Genealogies of Labor Servitude in Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PSZ. (II). Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiskoi Imperii (hereafter PSZ) [Full collection of laws of the Russian Empire], three series, I: 1649––1825, 46 vols; II: 1830–84, 55 vols.; III:1885–1916, 33 vols: Saint Petersburg.Google Scholar
Raeff, Marc (1983). The Well-Ordered Police State: Social and Institutional Change Through Law in the Germanies and Russia, 1600–1800. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
RGIA (Russian Imperial Archives) fond 777, opis’ 1, delo 200.Google Scholar
Rosen, Fred (1992). Bentham, Byron and Greece: Constitutionalism, Nationalism, and Early Liberal Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Andrew (2007). Liberalism in Empire; Robert Travers, Ideology and Empire in Eighteenth Century India. The British in Bengal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, et al. (2004) Societies After Slavery: A Selected Annotated Bibliography of Printed Sources on Cuba, Brazil, British Colonial Africa, South Africa and the British West Indies. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Semple, Janet (1992). “Foucault and Bentham: A Defence of Panopticism.” Utilitas 4:1, pp. 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shvittau, Georg, Trudovaia pomoshch v Rossii [Labor assistance in Russia], 2 vols. Petrograd: tip. A. Kollias.Google Scholar
Stanziani, Alessandro (2008a). “Free Labor-Forced Labor: An Uncertain Boundary ? The Circulation of Economic Ideas Between Russia and Europe.” Kritika, 9:1, pp. 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanziani, Alessandro (2008b). “Free Labor-Forced Labor: An Uncertain Boundary? The Circulation of Economic Ideas Between Russia and Europe From the 18th to the Mid-19th Century.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 9:1, pp. 7–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanziani, Alessandro (2009). “The Traveling Panopticon: Labor Institutions and Labor Practices in Russia and Britain in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 51:(4), pp. 715–41.Google Scholar
Stanziani, Alessandro (2012). Bâtisseurs d'Empires. Russie, Inde et Chine à la croisée des mondes, 17e-19e siècle. Paris: Liber.Google Scholar
Stanziani, Alessandro (2014). Bondage. Labor and Rights in Eurasia, From the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Stanziani, Alessandro (2017). “Slavery in India.” In The Cambridge World History of Slavery, eds. Eltis, David, Engerman, Stanley, Drescher, Seymour, Richardson, David, vol. 4, AD 1804- AD 2016. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 246–71.Google Scholar
Stanziani, Alessandro (2018). Labor on the Fringes of Empire. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Philip (2011). The Company State. Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundation of the British Empire in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunderland, Williard (2004). Taming the Wild Field. Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, p. 110.Google Scholar
Tarasov, Iurii M. (1984). Russkaia krest'ianskaia kolonizatsiia iuzhnogo Urala: vtoraia polovina XVIII- pervaia polovina XIX vekoi (The Russian peasant colonization of south Urals, second half of the 18th century, first half of the 19th century), Moscow: Gozizdat.Google Scholar
Tatishchev, Vasily (1962). Istoriia Rossiiskaia s samykh drevneishikh vremen. (History of Russia since the most ancient times), original 1739, edition: Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Temperley, Howard (2000). “The Delegalization of Slavery in British India.” Slavery and Abolition 21:2, pp. 169–87.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1990). Coercion, Capital and European States. AD 990–1991. Cambridge-Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
TsGIAM (Moscow State Archives), fond 54 (Moskovskoe gubernskoe upravlenie), 1783–1917, opis’ 1, for example 56, 284, 966, 1509.Google Scholar
Vad, G. C. ed (1902–11). Selection From the Satara Raja and Peshwas’ Diaries. Pune: Deccan Vernacular Translation Society, 9 parts.Google Scholar
Visana, Vikram (2016). “Vernacular Liberalism, Capitalism, and Anti-Imperialism in the Political Thought of Dadabhai Naoroji.” Historical Journal 59:3, pp. 775–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vishwanath, Ramkrishna (1843). Hindustan chi Prachin va samprat chi stithi va poodhe kay tyacha parinam honar yavishayi vichar. Mumbai: Prabhakar Press.Google Scholar
Warriar, Louise, Robert, Andrew, and Lewis, Jennifer Surveillance: An Analysis of Jeremy Bentham and Michel Foucault and Their Present-day Relevance, http://www.mdx.ac.uk/WWW/STUDY/ybenfou.htm. accessed 21 July 2008.Google Scholar
Werrett, Simon (1999). “Potemkin and the Panopticon: Samuel Bentham and the Architecture of Absolutism in Eighteenth-Century Russia.” The Philosophic Age Almanac 9:special issue: The Science of Morality: Jeremy Bentham and Russia, pp. 106–35.Google Scholar
Wiener, Martin (2009). An Empire on Trial: Race, Murder and Justice Under British Rule, 1870–1935 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Larry (1994). Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zakalinskaia, Evgeniia P. (1958). Votchinnye khoziaistva Mogiliovskoi gubernii vo vtoroi polovine XVIII veka [Noble estates in the province of Mogilyov during the second half of the eighteenth century] (Mogilyov: Mogilevskii oblast’ Kraeved. muzei, 1958): 27, 34.Google Scholar
Zastopul, Lynn (1999). “India, J.S. Mill and Western Culture.” In J.S. Mill's Encounter with India, eds. Martin, Moir, Douglas, Peers, Lynn, Zastoupil, pp. 111–148. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar