Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:32:29.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant's wager. Kant's strong belief in extra-terrestrial life, the history of this question and its challenge for theology today

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2016

Andreas Losch
Andreas Losch*
Affiliation:
Center for Space and Habitability, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
*
e-mail: andreas.losch@csh.unibe.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kant was not the first in whom the ‘starry heavens’ above us inspired awe and wonder. For Kant, who was firmly convinced of the existence of inhabitants of other worlds, these heavens were inhabited. He is certain that ‘If it were possible to settle by any sort of experience whether there are inhabitants of at least some of the planets that we see, I might well bet everything that I have on it. Hence I say that it is not merely an opinion but a strong belief (on the correctness of which I would wager many advantages in life) that there are also inhabitants of other worlds.’ In this statement by Kant in no less a work than the Critique of Pure Reason one can, on the one hand, recognize a reflection of Kant's earlier convictions and expositions, on the other hand, the context of the citation and the contemporary background are, of course, relevant. Following the example of Kant, this paper investigates the meaning of such reflections about inhabitants of alien worlds, which due to advances in planetary astronomy are today again on the agenda. Consideration of this subject also represents a challenge for theology.

Keywords

KantWagerbeliefextra-terrestrial lifehistorytheologyplurality of worlds
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Astrobiology , Volume 15 , Special Issue 4: The history and philosophy of the Origin of Life , October 2016 , pp. 261 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerma, K. (2002). Außerirdische, Einleitung in die Philosophie; Extraterrestrier im Denken von Epikur bis Hans Jonas. Verlagshaus Monsenstein und Vannerdat.Google Scholar
Barbour, I.G. (1997). Religion and Science. HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
Barth, K. (1957). The Church Dogmatics II/1. T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Barth, K. (1961). The Church Dogmatics IV/3. T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Batalha, N.M. (2014). Exploring exoplanet populations with NASA's Kepler Mission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 35, 12647–12654.Google Scholar
Catling, D. (2013). Astrobiology, A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crowe, M.J. (1999). The Extraterrestrial Life Debate, 1750–1900. Unabridged Dover.Google Scholar
Crowe, M.J., Dowd, M.F. (2013). The extraterrestrial life debate from antiquity to 1900. In Astrobiology, History, and Society, Life beyond Earth and the Impact of Discovery, ed. Vakoch, D.A., pp. 3–56. Springer.Google Scholar
Daecke, S.M. (1987). Zur angelsächsischen Literatur. In Der Dialog zwischen Theologie und Naturwissenschaft, Ein bibliographischer Bericht, ed. Hübner, J., pp. 32–36. Chr. Kaiser Verlag.Google Scholar
Davies, P. (1983). God and the New Physics. Dent.Google Scholar
Dick, S.J. (1982). Plurality of Worlds, The Origins of the Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Democritus to Kant. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dick, S.J. (2001). Life on Other Worlds, The 20th-Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evers, D. (2000). Raum, Materie, Zeit, Schöpfungstheologie im Dialog mit naturwissenschaftlicher Kosmologie. Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Faye, H. (1884). Sur l'Origin du Monde, Theories cosmogoniques des anciens et modernes. Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Gensichen, J.F. (1791). Afterword. In Über den Bau des Himmels, Drey Abhandlungen aus dem Englischen übersetzt nebst einem authentischen Auszug aus Kants allgemeiner Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels, pp. 201–204. Friedrich Nicclovius.Google Scholar
Gribbin, J. (2008). Galaxies, A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamel, J. (2005). Nachwort. In Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels oder Versuch von der Verfassung und dem mechanischen Ursprunge des ganzen Weltgebäudes nach Newtonischen Grundsätzen abgehandelt, pp. 147–207. Verlag Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2010). Die Fixierung des modernen Wissenschaftsideals durch Laplace. Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Höffe, O. (2004). Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Die Grundlage der modernen Philosophie, 3rd edn. C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Hugo, V. (1955). Choses Vues. André Martel.Google Scholar
Jaki, S.L. (1977). Planets and Planetarians, A History of Theories of the Origin of Planetary Systems. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Jones, K.G. (1971). The observational basis for Kant's cosmogony, a critical analysis. J. History Astron. ii, 29–34.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Guyer, P. & Wood, A.W.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1999). Critique of Practical Reason (1788), in Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment, translated and edited by Guyer, P. et al. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2009). Kritik der Urteilskraft, Mit Einleitungen und Bibliographie herausgegeben von Heiner F. Klemme. Meinerv.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2011). Anthropology, History and Education, translated and edited by Zöller, G. et al. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2012). Natural Science, translated and edited by Watkins, E. et al. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knobloch, E. (2002). Vielheit der Welten – extraterrestrische Existenz. In Ideale Akademie, Vergangene Zukunft oder konkrete Utopie? ed. Vosskamp, W., pp. 165–186. Oldenbourg Akademieverlag.Google Scholar
Krafft, F. (1971). Nachwort. In Immanuel Kant. Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels, ed. Krafft, F., pp. 179–211. Kindler.Google Scholar
Kreimendahl, L. (2011). Einleitung. In Der einzig mögliche Beweisgrund zu einer Demonstration des Daseins Gottes, Historisch-kritische Edition, ed. Kant, I. & Kreimendahl, L.. Meiner, I-CXXIX.Google Scholar
Kurth, R. (1956). Kants “Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels” von 1755 und die moderne Wissenschaft, Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Bern Neue Reihe 13.Google Scholar
Losch, A. (2011). Jenseits der Konflikte, Eine konstruktiv-kritische Auseinandersetzung von Theologie und Naturwissenschaft. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Losch, A. (2015). Kants Wette. Von Kants starkem Glauben an ausserirdisches Leben, der Geschichte dieser Fragestellung und ihrer Herausforderung für die Theologie heute. In Theologische Zeitschrift 1/71 (2015), pp. 23–47.Google Scholar
Losch, A., Krebs, A. (2015). Implications for the discovery of extraterrestrial Life – a theological approach. Theol. Sci. 13(2), 230–244.Google Scholar
Newton, I. (1978). Four letters from Sir Isaac Newton to Doctor Bentley containing some arguments in proof of a deity (London 1756). In Isaac Newton's Papers & Letters on Natural Philosophy and Related Documents, ed. Cohen, I.B.. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nuttall, A.D. (1984). Pope's “Essay on man”. George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Paine, T. (1794). The Age of Reason, Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology. Barrois.Google Scholar
Peters, T. (1977). UFOs–God's Chariots? Flying Saucers in Politics, Science and Religion. John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Peters, T. (1994). Exo-Theology: Speculations on Extra-Terrestrial Life, CTNS Bulletin 3/1994.Google Scholar
Peters, T. (2013). Astroethics, engaging extraterrestrial intelligent life-forms. In Encountering Life in the Universe, Ethical Foundations and Social Implications of Astrobiology, ed. Impey, C., Spitz, A.H. & Stoeger, W.R.. The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Peters, T. (2014). Astrotheology: a constructive Proposal, Zygon 2/2014, pp. 443–457.Google Scholar
Pope, A. (1740). Hrn. B.H. Brockes aus dem Englischen übersetzter Versuch vom Menschen des Herrn Alexander Pope nebst verschiedenen andern Uebersetzungen und einigen eigenen Gedichten. Nebst einer Vorrede und einem Anhange von Briefen … from the History of the Works of the Learned translated by B.J. Zinck, Herold.Google Scholar
Richter, J.P. (1826). Erstes Blumenstück. Rede des todten Christus vom Weltgebäude herab, daß kein Gott sei, in: Blume-, Frucht- und Dornenstücke oder Ehestand, Tod und Hochzeit des Armenadvokaten F. St. Siebenkäs, G. Reimer.Google Scholar
Szendy, P. (2013). Kant in the Land of Extraterrestrials. Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Waschkies, H.-J. (1987). Physik und Physikotheologie des jungen Kant, Die Vorgeschichte seiner Allgemeinen Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels. Grüner.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2002). Where is everybody? Fifty Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life. Springer.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1853). Of the Plurality of Worlds: an Essay. John W. Parker and Son.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. (2013). Science, Religion, and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wille, H. (2005). Kant über Ausserirdische, Zur Figur des Alien im vorkritischen und kritischen Werk. Verlagshaus Monsenstein und Vannerdat.Google Scholar
Wright, T. (1971). An Original Theory or New Hypothesis Of The Universe, 1750. Macdonald.Google Scholar
Zweig, A. (1967). Kant. Philosophical Correspondence, 1759–99. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar