Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:44:01.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Caribbean Collections in European Museums and the Question of Returns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2017

Mariana Françozo
Affiliation:
Department of Heritage and Society, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Netherlands; Email: m.francozo@arch.leidenuniv.nl; a.strecker@arch.leidenuniv.nl
Amy Strecker
Affiliation:
Department of Heritage and Society, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Netherlands; Email: m.francozo@arch.leidenuniv.nl; a.strecker@arch.leidenuniv.nl

Abstract:

Since 2014, when the Caribbean Community officially launched its claim against former European colonial powers for reparations for slavery and native genocide, there has been a renewed interest in the question of cultural reparations and, more specifically, Caribbean cultural objects located in European museums. Yet information about such material remains scarce; there have been no formal claims for returns, and the legal status of Caribbean collections in European museums is anything but clear. This article aims to address these issues. First, we sketch the profile of Caribbean archaeological collections located in European museums to shed light on their nature and provenance. On this basis, we then move on to analyzing the legal status of such collections in light of international law, before discussing the broader political and ethical framework of returns and the role of cultural cooperation in reparatory justice for the Caribbean more generally.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Andree, R. 1902. “Zwei Zemis von Gonaïves, Insel Haiti.” Globus 82: 309.Google Scholar
Basu, Paul. 2011. “Object Diasporas, Resourcing Communities: Sierra Leonean Collections in the Global Museumscape.” Museum Anthropology 34, no. 1: 2842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercht, Fatima, et al, eds. 1997. Taíno: Pre-Columbian Art and Culture from the Caribbean. New York: Museo del Barrio/Monacelli Press.Google Scholar
Buijs, Cunera, and Jakobsen, Aviâja Rosing. 2011. “The Nooter Photo Collection and the Roots2Share Project of Museums in Greenland and the Netherlands.” Inuit Studies 35, nos. 1–2: 165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabello Carro, Paz. 1989. Coleccionismo americano indígena en la España del siglo XVIII. Madrid: Ediciones de Cultura Hispánica.Google Scholar
Cabello Carro, Paz. 1994. “De las antiguas colecciones americanas al actual Museo de América.” Boletín de la ANABAD 44, no. 4: 177202.Google Scholar
Cabello Carro, Paz. 2001. “La formación de las colecciones americanas en España: evolución de los criterios.” Anales del Museo de América 9: 303–18.Google Scholar
Cater, Robert R. 1982. “The Taranaki Panels: A Case Study in the Recovery of Cultural Heritage.” Museum 34: 256–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chechi, Alessandro. 2008. “The Return of Cultural Objects Removed in Times of Colonial Domination and International Law: The Case of the Venus of Cyrene.” Italian Yearbook of International Law 18: 159–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chechi, Alessandro. 2012. “Multi-Level Cooperation to Safeguard the Human Dimension of Cultural Heritage and to Secure the Return of Wrongfully Removed Cultural Objects.” In Cultural Heritage, Cultural Rights, Cultural Diversity. New Developments in International Law, edited by Borelli, Silvia and Lenzerini, Federico, 347–68. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth Secretariat. 1995. “LMM(93)3 Proposed Commonwealth Scheme for the Protection of the Material Cultural Heritage.” In 1993 Meeting of Commonwealth Law Ministers: Grand Baie, Mauritius, 15–19 November 1993: Memoranda Part 1, 189222. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
Delpuech, Andre. 2015. “Sur la constitution des Naturels du pays: Archaeology in French Saint-Domingue in the Eighteenth Century.” In Proceedings of the 25th International Congress for Caribbean Archaeology, 582607. San Juan: IACA-AIAC Congress.Google Scholar
Delpuech, Andre, and Roux, B.. 2015. “À La Recherche de la Culture Matérielle des ‘Caraïbes Insulaires’: Collections Amazoniennes et Antillaises D’Ancien Régime en France”. In À La Recherche du Caraïbe Perdu: Les Populations Amérindiennes des Petites Antilles de L’époque Précolombienne à la Période Colonial, edited by Grunberg, Bernard, 319–44. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Francioni, Francesco. 2008. “Culture, Heritage and Human Rights: An Introduction.” In Cultural Human Rights, edited by Francioni, Francesco and Scheinin, Martin, 1–15. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzo Falci, Catarina, Gijn, Annelou Van, Antczak, Marlena M., Antczak, Andrej T., and Hofman, Corinne L.. 2017. “Challenges for Microwear Analysis of Figurative Shell Ornaments from Pre-Colonial Venezuela.” Journal of Archaeological Science 11: 115–30.Google Scholar
Hamy, E. T. 1899. “Les aquarelles archéologiques de M Guesde de la Pointe à Pitre.” In Decades Americanæ: mémoires d’archéologie et d’ethnographie Américaines, edited by Hamy, E. T., 156–65. Paris: E. Leroux.Google Scholar
Hicks, Dan, and Cooper, Jago. 2013. “The Caribbean.” In World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: A Characterization, edited by Hicks, Dan and Stevenson, Alice, 401–8. Oxford: Archaeopress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofman, Corinne, and Hoogland, Menno. 2011. “Unravelling the Multi-Scale Networks of Mobility and Exchange in the Pre-Colonial Circum-Caribbean.” In Communities in Contact, edited by Hofman, Corinne L. and van Duijvenbode, Anne, 1543. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Jordan Gschwend, Annemarie. 2012. Catarina de Áustria: A rainha colecionadora. Lisbon: Círculo de Leitores.Google Scholar
Jordan Gschwend, Annemarie, and Lowe, K. J. P.. 2015. The Global City: On the Streets of Renaissance Lisbon. London: Paul Holberton Publishing.Google Scholar
Joyce, Rosemary. 2012. “From Place to Place: Provenience, Provenance, and Archaeology.” In Provenance: An Alternate History of Art, edited by Feigenbaum, Gail and Reist, Inge, 4860. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
Joyce, Rosemary. 2013. “When Is Authentic? Situating Authenticity in Itineraries of Objects.” In Creating Authenticity: Authentication Process in Ethnographic Museums, edited by Geurds, Alexander and Van Broekhoven, Laura, 3957. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Kerchache, Jacques, ed. 1994. L’Art des Sculpteurs Taïnos. Paris: Musée du Petit Palais.Google Scholar
Lixinski, Lucas. 2015. “Cultural Heritage Law and Transitional Justice.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 9, no. 2: 278–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Otis T. 1899. The Latimer Collection of Antiquities from Porto Rico in the National Museum, and the Guesde Collection of Antiquities in Pointe-a-Pitre, Guadeloupe, West Indies. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Modest, Wayne. 2012. “Material Bridges: Objects, Museums and New Indigeneity in the Caribbean.” In Anthropology, Indigenous Scholars and the Research Endeavour: Seeking Bridges towards Mutual Respect, edited by Hardy, Joy and Fitznor, Laara, 186–87. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Myers, Robert. 1980. “Archaeological Materials from Doninica in North American and European Musuems.” In Proceedings of the International Congress for the Study of Pre-Columbian Cultures in the Lesser Antilles, 473–80. Anthropological Research Paper no. 22. Tempe: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Newell, J. 2012. “Old Objects, New Media: Historical Collections, Digitization and Affect.” Journal of Material Culture 17, no. 3: 287306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, Patrick. 1995. “Protection of the Material Cultural Heritage: The Commonwealth Scheme.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 44, no. 1: 147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, Jose R., ed. 2008. El caribe precolombino: Fray Ramón Pané y el universo taíno. Barcelona: Catalogue of the exhibit organized by the Museu Barbier-Mueller d’Art Pre-colombí (Barcelona), with the collaboration of the British Museum, Ministerio de Cultura, Museo de América, and Fundación Caixa Galicia.Google Scholar
Ostapkowicz, Joanna. 2013. “‘Made … with Admirable Artistry’: The Context, Manufacture and History of a Taíno Belt.” Antiquaries Journal 93: 287317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostapkowicz, Joanna. 2015. “The Sculptural Legacy of the Jamaican Taíno: Part 1: The Carpenter’s Mountain Carvings.” Jamaica Journal 35, no. 3: 52–61.Google Scholar
Ostapkowicz, Joanna, and Newsom, Lee. 2012. “‘Gods … Adorned with the Embroiderer’s Needle’: The Materials, Making and Meaning of a Taíno Cotton Reliquary.” Latin American Antiquity 23, no. 3: 300–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostapkowicz, Joanna, Brock, Fiona, Wiedenhoeft, Alex C., Schulting, Rick, and Saviola, Donatella. 2017. “Integrating the Old World into the New: An Idol from the West Indies.” Antiquity 91, no. 359: 1314–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostapkowicz, Joanna, Ramsey, Christopher B., Wiedenhoeft, Alex, Higham, Tom, Wilson, Samuel, and Brock, Fiona. 2011. “‘This Relic of Antiquity’: Fifth to Fifteenth Century Wood Carvings from the Southern Lesser Antilles.” In Communities in Contact, edited by Hofman, Corinne L. and Van Duijvenbode, Anne, 137–70. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Philips, Ruth, Bohaker, Heidi, and Ojiig Corbiere, Alan. 2015. “Wampum Unites Us: Digital Access, Interdisciplinarity and Indigenous Knowledge: Situating the GRASAC Knowledge Sharing Database.” In Museum as Process: Translating Local and Global Knowledges, edited by Silverman, Raymond, 4566. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prott, Lyndel V. 1995. “The Experience of UNESCO with the Return of Cultural Objects.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 89: 443–47.Google Scholar
Prott, Lyndel V., ed. 2009. Witness to History: Documents and Writings on the Return of Cultural Objects. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Ramos, Reniel. 2011. “The Circulation of Jadeitite across the Caribbeanscape.” In Communities in Contact, edited by Hofman, Corinne L. and Van Duijvenbode, Anne, 117–36. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, Raymond. 2015. “Introduction: Museum as Process.” In Museum as Process: Translating Local and Global Knowledges, edited by Silverman, Raymond, 118. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, Ramesh, Boast, Robin, Furner, Jonathan, and Becvar, Katherine M.. 2009. “Digital Museums and Diverse Cultural Knowledges: Moving Past the Traditional Catalog.” Information Society 25, no. 4: 265–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strecker, Amy. 2016. “Revival, Recognition, Restitution: Indigenous Rights in the Eastern Caribbean.” International Journal of Cultural Property 23, no. 2: 167–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strecker, Amy. 2017. “Indigenous Land Rights and Caribbean Reparations Discourse.” Leiden Journal of International Law 30, no. 3: 629–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbati, Sabrina. 2014. “Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Cultural Property: Related Disputes: UNESCO Mediation and Conciliation Procedures.” In Art, Cultural Heritage and the Market, edited by Hildegard, E. G. S. and Vadi, Valentina, 93116. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Broekhoven, Laura. 2013. “Authenticity and Curatorial Practice.” In Creating Authenticity: Authentication Process in Ethnographic Museums, edited by Geurds, Alexander and Van Broekhoven, Laura, 151–61. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Veys, Wonu. 2010. Mana Māori: The Power of New-Zealand’s First Inhabitants. Leiden: Leiden University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa. 2008. International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, John, and Ferbel, Peter. 1994. Ancient Caribbean. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar