Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:28:28.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Place-based pedagogies of hope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2022

Bronwen Morgan  and
Amelia Thorpe
Bronwen Morgan
Affiliation:
UNSW Law & Justice, Australia
Amelia Thorpe*
Affiliation:
UNSW Law & Justice, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: a.thorpe@unsw.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The need to engage students in thinking about the politics of law, especially in a time of escalating climate and other crises, is increasingly urgent. In this paper, we discuss a series of place-based teaching strategies designed to foster critical legal thinking, but also hope and a sense of agency. Inspired by a range of scholars – Bruno Latour, Doreen Massey, Henry Giroux and J.K. Gibson-Graham – we use context in an effort to cultivate what Giroux calls ‘educated hope’. Our starting point is what the law does (and also what law does not do and what it could do), not what the law is. Instead of taking a field of law and then using examples to illustrate how it works in context, we discuss three courses that start with the context of a particular place. Our courses cover a range of laws that work together to shape that place, spanning multiple fields, and emphasise their peopled and place-based specificity. After discussing teaching and assessment strategies that we have found productive, we reflect on implications beyond our courses, and the potential for broader place-based legal pedagogies.

Keywords

hopejusticecontextagencycritiquepedagogy
Type
Special Issue Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 18 , Special Issue 4: Contextual Legal Pedagogy , December 2022 , pp. 427 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coe, NM and Smyth, FM (2010) Students as tour guides: innovation in fieldwork assessment. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 34, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N (1996) Social justice in the age of identity politics: redistribution, recognition and participation. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Stanford University, 30 May 1996.Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, JK (2008) Diverse economies: performative practices for ‘other worlds’. Progress in Human Geography 32, 613–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson-Graham, JK, Cameron, J and Healy, S (2013) Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming Our Communities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giroux, H (2007) Utopian thinking in dangerous times: critical pedagogy and the project of educated hope. In Cote, M (ed.), Utopian Pedagogy, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Footprint Network (n.d.) What is your ecological footprint? Available at: https://www.footprintcalculator.org/home/en (accessed 8 June 2022).Google Scholar
Higgins, N, Dewhurst, E and Watkins, L (2012) Field trips as short-term experiential learning activities in legal education. The Law Teacher 46, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, N (2000) A brief history of critique in Australian legal education. Melbourne Law Review 24, 965–981.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D (2007) Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Polemic Against the System. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Krakowka, AR (2012) Field trips as valuable learning experiences in geography courses. Journal of Geography 111, 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, C et al. (2017) The ‘real value’ of field trips in the early weeks of higher education: the student perspective. Educational Studies 43, 110–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B (2018) Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H (1996) Writings on Cities. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Lyons, C, Crosby, A and Morgan-Harris, H (2018) Going on a field trip: critical geographical walking tours and tactical media as urban praxis in Sydney, Australia. M/C Journal 21. Available at: https://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/1446 (accessed 16 March 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, D (2004) Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 86, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, D (2005) For Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Morgan, B (2020) Law in context as terrestrial politics?. International Journal of Law in Context 16, 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B and Kuch, D (2020) Diverse legalities: pluralism and instrumentalism. In Gibson, K and Dombrowski, K (eds), Handbook of Diverse Economies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Morgan, B, Thorpe, A and Cooper, D (2021) The hopeful edges of power: radical governance and acting ‘as if’. Griffith Review 73, 233–245.Google Scholar
Rawls, J (1972) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Raworth, K (2017) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-century Economist. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Reft, R (2015) From Bus Riders Union to Bus Rapid Transit: Race, Class, and Transit Infrastructure in Los Angeles. Los Angeles: KCET. Available at: https://www.kcet.org/history-society/from-bus-riders-union-to-bus-rapid-transit-race-class-and-transit-infrastructure-in-los-angeles (accessed 17 November 2021).Google Scholar
Regen Sydney (2022) Growing the Movement for a Regenerative Sydney. Sydney: Regen Sydney. Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/60261996c9b3ef613a6f35f8/t/626a1cd85685f87a435746c7/1651121411693/Growing+the+movement+for+a+regenerative+Sydney.pdf (accessed 22 July 2022).Google Scholar
Riles, A (2016) Is the law hopeful? In Miyazaki, H and Swedberg, R (eds), The Economy of Hope. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 126–146.Google Scholar
Sandercock, L (1975) Cities for Sale: Property, Politics, and Urban Planning in Australia. Carlton, Vic: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D (2009) Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheller, M (2018) Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in the Age of Extremes. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Sherry, C (2022) Learning from the dirt: initiating university food gardens as a cross-disciplinary tertiary teaching tool. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education. Online first: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-022-00100-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrewsbury, C (1987) What is feminist pedagogy? Women's Studies Quarterly 15, 6–14.Google Scholar
Slavery Footprint (n.d.) How many slaves work for you? Available at: https://slaveryfootprint.org/ (accessed 17 November 2021).Google Scholar
Springgay, S and Truman, SE (2022) Critical walking methodologies and oblique agitations of place. Qualitative Inquiry 28, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stretton, H (1970) Ideas for Australian Cities. Melbourne: Hugh Stretton.Google Scholar
Thorpe, A (2013) Participation in planning: lessons from the Green Bans. Environmental and Planning Law Journal 30, 93–105.Google Scholar
Wildcat, M et al. (2014) Learning from the land: indigenous land based pedagogy and decolonization. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 3, I–XV.Google Scholar
York Law School (n.d.) Problem-based Learning. Available at: https://www.york.ac.uk/law/undergraduate/pbl/ (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Young, IM (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar