Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T22:11:02.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theorising law and legitimacy in international criminal justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2007

Ralph Henham
Ralph Henham*
Affiliation:
Professor of Criminal Justice, Nottingham Trent University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper seeks to explore the relationship between law and morality and its relevance for establishing the legitimacy of international criminal justice (ICJ) within the context of international trials. At present, imperatives for peace and reconstruction in conflict societies are divorced both conceptually and practically from the process of punishment in international criminal trials. It argues that, in order for international trial justice to move beyond partial forms of retributivism requires a profound re-alignment of the rationales underpinning international penality and a merging of retributive and restorative justice forms. The paper suggests that the resolution of ‘truth’ must go further than this by implicating penal law and process as crucial determinants of ‘legitimate’ strategies for intervention, thereby enabling a wider choice of consequent resolutions. The paper suggests that the intrinsic value of international criminal process lies in its capacity to confront the relativism of ICJ by providing the means to engage with its plurality and so increase its legitimacy for all victims and communities affected by social conflict and war. In so doing it considers how law may be transformed into normative guides to conduct and examines the relationship between the processes of legal reasoning and sentence decision-making in international criminal trials.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 257 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2004) Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R. B. M. (1989) The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R. B. M. (1999) Emile Durkheim: Law in a Moral Domain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R. B. M. (2002) ‘Subverting Orthodoxy, Making Law Central: A View of Socio-Legal Studies’, Journal of Law and Society 29: 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallaire, R., Manocha, K. and Degnarain, N. (2005) ‘The Major Powers on Trial’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 3: 861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drumbl, M. A. (2005) ‘Collective Violence and Individual Punishment: The Criminality of Mass Atrocity’, Northwestern University Law Review 99: 539.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1982) The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method, Halls, W. D. (trans). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1984) ‘Two Laws of Penal Evolution’, in Lukes, S. and Scull, A. (eds.), Durkheim and the Law. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1998) Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Findlay, M. and Henham, R. (2005) Transforming International Criminal Justice: Retributive and Restorative Justice in the Trial Process. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, M. and Henham, R. (forthcoming) Beyond Punishment? Achieving International Criminal Justice.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. (1980) Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. (1969) The Morality of Law, 2nd edn. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (1990) Punishment and Modern Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1968) Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henham, R. (2005a) Punishment and Process in International Criminal Trials. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Henham, R. (2005b) ‘Plea bargaining and the legitimacy of international trial justice: some observations on the Dragan Nikolic sentencing judgement of the ICTY’, International Criminal Law Review 5: 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, B. (2003) Justice in the Risk Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kamenka, E. (1979) ‘What is justice?’, in Kamenka, E. and Tay, A. E. -S. (eds.), Justice. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2002) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1985) A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. and Swift, A. (1966) Liberals & Communitarians, 2nd edn. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oderberg, D. S. (2000) Moral Theory: A Non-Consequentialist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1973) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1999) Practical Reason and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (2001) Ethics in the Public Domain, revd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. (2006) ‘Theorising Procedural Traditions: Subjects, Objects and Values in Criminal Adjudication’, in Duff, A. et al., The Trial on Trial: Volume 2. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. and Mcmillan, N. (2003) ‘For Criminology in International Criminal Justice’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 1: 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, M. (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, B. Z. (1997) Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and a Social Theory of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar