Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:23:26.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis and mitigation of phase noise and sampling jitter in OFDM radio receivers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

Ville Syrjälä  and
Mikko Valkama
Ville Syrjälä*
Affiliation:
Department of Communications Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Mikko Valkama
Affiliation:
Department of Communications Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
*
Corresponding author: V. Syrjälä Email: ville.syrjala@tut.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the analysis and digital signal processing (DSP)-based mitigation of phase noise and sampling clock jitter in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) radios. In the phase noise studies, the basic direct-conversion receiver architecture case is assumed with noisy downconverting oscillator. In the sampling jitter case, on the other hand, the so-called direct-radio-frequency-sampling receiver architecture is deployed utilizing bandpass sub-sampling principle. The basis for the DSP-based impairment mitigation techniques is first formed using analytical receiver modeling with incoming OFDM waveform, where the effects of both oscillator phase noise and sampling clock jitter are mapped to certain type subcarrier cross-talk and distortion compared to ideal receiver case. Then iterative detection principles and interpolation techniques are developed to essentially estimate and cancel the subcarrier distortion. Also some related practical aspects, like channel estimation, are addressed. The performance of the proposed mitigation techniques is analyzed and verified with extensive computer simulations. In the simulations, realistic phase-locked-loop-based oscillator models are used for phase noise and sampling clock jitter. In addition, different received signal conditions like plain additive white Gaussian noise channel and extended ITU-R Vehicular A multipath channel are considered for practical purposes. Altogether the obtained results indicate that the effects of oscillator and sampling clock instabilities can be efficiently reduced using the developed signal processing techniques.

Keywords

Direct-conversion receiverRF sub-sampling receiverPhase noiseSampling jitterOFDMIntercarrier interferenceMitigationCancelation
Type
Original Article
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 193 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Fettweis, G.: Dirty RF: A new paradigm, in Proc. 16th Int. Symp. on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications 2005, vol. 4, September 2005, 2347–2355.Google Scholar
[2]Robertson, P. and Kaiser, S.: Analysis of the effects of phase-noise in orthogonal frequency division multiplex (OFDM) systems, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications, vol. 3, June 1995, 1652–1657.Google Scholar
[3]Schenk, T.: RF Impairments in Multiple Antenna OFDM: Influence and Mitigation, Ph.D. Dissertation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2006, ISBN 90–386-1913-8, 291pp.Google Scholar
[4]Armada, A.; Calvo, M.: Phase noise and sub-carrier spacing effects on the performance of an OFDM communication system. IEEE Commun. Lett., 2 (1) (1998), 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Tomba, L.: On the effect of Wiener phase noise in OFDM systems. IEEE Trans. Commun., 46 (5) (1998), 580–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Bingham, J.A.C.: Multicarrier modulation for data transmission: an idea whose time has come. IEEE Commun. Mag., 28 (5) (1990), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Petrovic, D.; Rave, W.; Fettweis, G.: Effects of phase noise on OFDM systems with and without PLL: characterization and compensation. IEEE Trans. Commun., 55 (8) (2007), 1607–1616.Google Scholar
[8]Razavi, B.: RF Microelectronics, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1998, 335pp.Google Scholar
[9]Frerking, M.E.: Digital Signal Processing in Communication Systems, International Thomson Publishing Services, 1994, 644pp.Google Scholar
[10]Vaughan, R.G.; Scott, N.L.; White, D.R.: The theory of bandpass sampling. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 39 (1991), 1973–1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Amin, B.; Dempster, A.G.: Sampling and jitter considerations for GNSS software receivers, in Proc. IGNSS Symp. 2006, July 2006, 15pp.Google Scholar
[12]Shinagawa, M.; Akazawa, Y.; Wakimoto, T.: Jitter analysis of high-speed sampling systems. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, 25 (1) (1990), 220–224.Google Scholar
[13]Syrjälä, V.; Valkama, M.; Tchamov, N.N.; Rinne, J.: Phase noise modelling and mitigation techniques in OFDM communications systems, in Proc. Wireless Telecommunications Symp. 2008, Prague, Czech Republic, April 2009.Google Scholar
[14]Bittner, S.; Zimmermann, E.; Fettweis, G.: Exploiting phase noise properties in the design of MIMO-OFDM receivers, in Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf. 2008, Las Vegas, NV, March 2008, 940–945.Google Scholar
[15]Bittner, S.; Rave, W.; Fettweis, G.: Joint iterative transmitter and receiver phase noise correction using soft information, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications 2007, June 2007, 2847–2852.Google Scholar
[16]Zou, Q.; Tarighat, A.; Sayed, A.H.: Compensation of phase noise in OFDM wireless systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 55 (11) (2007), 5407–5424.Google Scholar
[17]Wu, S.; Bar-Ness, Y.: A phase noise suppression algorithm for OFDM-based WLANs. IEEE Commun. Lett., 6 (12) (2002), 535–537.Google Scholar
[18]Wu, S.; Bar-Ness, Y.: OFDM systems in the presence of phase noise: Consequences and solutions. IEEE Trans. Commun., 52 (11) (2004), 1988–1997.Google Scholar
[19]Syrjälä, V.; Valkama, M.: Jitter mitigation in high-frequency bandpass sampling OFDM radios, in Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf. 2009, Budapest, Hungary, April 2009.Google Scholar
[20]Syrjälä, V.; Valkama, M.: Sampling jitter estimation and mitigation in direct RF sub-sampling receiver architecture, in Proc. Sixth Int. Symp. on Wireless Communication Systems 2009, Siena-Tuscany, Italy, September 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Rutten, R.; Breems, L.J.; van Veldhoven, R.H.M.: Digital jitter-cancellation for narrowband signals, in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems 2008, May 2008, 1444–1447.Google Scholar
[22]Tchamov, N.N.; Rinne, J.; Syrjälä, V.; Valkama, M.; Zou, Y.; Renfors, M.: VCO phase noise trade-offs in PLL design for DVB-T/H receivers, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Electronics Circuits and Systems 2009, December 2009.Google Scholar
[23]3GPP Technical Specification, TS 36.211 v8.3.0, Physical Channels and Modulation (release 8), May 2008.Google Scholar
[24]Sorensen, T.B.; Mogersen, P.E.; Frederiksen, F.: Extension of the ITU channel models for wideband (OFDM) systems, in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf., Fall-2005, Dallas, TX, September 2005, 392–396.Google Scholar