Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:38:14.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eight-shaped polarization-dependent electromagnetic bandgap structure and its application as polarization reflector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2021

Priyanka Dalal*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana, India
Sanjeev Kumar Dhull
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana, India
*
Author for correspondence: Priyanka Dalal, E-mail: priyanka.dalal17@gmail.com

Abstract

In this paper, an eight-shaped polarization-dependent electromagnetic bandgap (ES-PDEBG) structure is proposed. The unit cell of ES-PDEBG structure consists of an outer eight-shaped EBG patch with two inner square patches and three vias. Surface wave bandgap and reflection phase characteristics have been studied for the proposed structure. From the measurement results, two surface wave bandgaps with center frequencies 3.42 and 5.88 GHz are observed along the X-direction, and one surface wave bandgap with center frequency 3.69 GHz is observed along the Y-direction. The refection phase bandgap of the proposed structure is centered at 5.61 and 3.31 GHz for x- and y-polarized incident plane waves, respectively. Furthermore, the application of the proposed structure as polarization reflector is presented. The study demonstrates that the structure can act as dual-band in-polarization reflector for circularly polarized waves. In addition, incident linearly polarized waves are reflected as circularly polarized waves in four operating bands.

Type
Metamaterials and Photonic Bandgap Structures
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Yang, F and Rahmat-Samii, Y (2003) Electromagnetic band gap structures in antenna engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, F and Rahmat-Samii, Y (2003) Reflection phase characterizations of the EBG ground plane for low profile wire antenna applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 51, 26912703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, F and Rahmat-Samii, Y (2003) Microstrip antennas integrated with electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures: a low mutual coupling design for array applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 51, 29362946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurra, L, Abegaonkar, M, Basu, A and Koul, SK (2013) A compact uniplanar EBG structure and its application in band-notched UWB filter. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 5, 491498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurra, L, Abegaonkar, M, Basu, A and Koul, SK (2016) FSS properties of a uniplanar EBG and its application in directivity enhancement of a microstrip antenna. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 15, 16061609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaglan, N, Kanaujia, BK, Gupta, SD and Srivastava, S (2016) Triple band notched UWB antenna design using electromagnetic band gap structures. Progress in Electromagnetics Research C 66, 139147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, P and Dhull, SK (2019) Electromagnetic band gap structure applications in modern wireless perspective: a review. IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering, Sathyamangalam, India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, P and Dhull, SK (2020) Upper WLAN band notched UWB monopole antenna using compact two via slot electromagnetic band gap structure. Progress in Electromagnetics Research C 100, 161171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, F and Rahmat-Samii, Y (2004) Polarization-dependent electromagnetic band gap (PDEBG) structures: designs and applications. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 41, 439444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, F and Rahmat-Samii, Y (2005) A low profile single dipole antenna radiating circularly polarized waves. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 53, 30833086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, T and Fukusako, T (2011) Broadband design of circularly polarized microstrip patch antenna using artificial ground structure with rectangular unit cells. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 59, 21032110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullah, S, Flint, JA and Seager, RD (2011) Polarisation-dependent electromagnetic bandgap incorporating a slanted sheet via. IET Microwaves and Antennas Propagation 5, 519527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, B, Sanz-Izquierdo, B, Parker, EA and Batchelor, JC (2015) A frequency and polarization reconfigurable circularly polarized antenna using active EBG structure for satellite navigation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63, 3340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamoorthy, K, Majumder, B, Mukherjee, J and Ray, KP (2014) A circular polarization reconfigurable antenna based on reconfigurable electromagnetic band-gap structures. 8th International Congress on Advanced Electromagnetic Materials in Microwaves and Optics. Lyngby, Denmark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, ZJ, Song, W and Sheng, XQ (2017) Gain enhancement and RCS reduction for patch antenna by using polarization-dependent EBG surface. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16, 16311634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, YQ and Yuan, NC (2005) Reflection phase and frequency bandgap characteristics of EBG structures with anisotropic periodicity. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications 19, 18971905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Y and Yuan, N (2007) Surface-wave bandgap of polarization dependent electromagnetic bandgap structures. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 49, 946949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, L, Ruan, CL and Li, ZQ (2010) A novel compact and polarization-dependent mushroom-type EBG using CSRR for dual/triple-band applications. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 20, 489491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, L, Ruan, CL and Xiong, J (2012) Compact EBG for multi-band applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 60, 44404444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhavarthe, PP, Rathod, SS and Reddy, KTV (2018) A compact two-via hammer spanner-type polarization-dependent electromagnetic bandgap structure. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 28, 284286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sievenpiper, D, Zhang, L, Broas, RFJ, Alexopolous, NG and Yablonovitch, E (1999) High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 47, 20592074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhavarthe, PP, Rathod, SS and Reddy, KTV (2017) A compact two via slot-type electromagnetic bandgap structure. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 27, 446448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R, Remski (2000) Analysis of photonic bandgap surfaces using Ansoft HFSS. Microwave Journal 43, 190199.Google Scholar
Yang, L, Fan, M, Chen, F, She, J and Feng, Z (2005) A novel compact electromagnetic-bandgap (EBG) structure and its application for microwave circuits. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 53, 183190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullah, S, Flint, JA and Seager, RD (2009) Polarisation dependent EBG surface with an inclined sheet via. Loughborough Antennas and Propagation Conference, Loughborough, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar