Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:38:25.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new electrically small antenna for on-demand 3.6/5.8 GHz wireless applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2021

Mohammad Ahmad Salamin Open the ORCID record for Mohammad Ahmad Salamin [Opens in a new window]  and
Asmaa Zugari
Mohammad Ahmad Salamin*
Affiliation:
Communication and Electronics Engineering, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, State of Palestine
Asmaa Zugari
Affiliation:
Information and Telecommunication System Laboratory, FS, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tetouan, Morocco
*
Author for correspondence: Mohammad Ahmad Salamin, E-mail: mohammad.salamin94@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a highly miniaturized dual-band electrically small antenna (ESA) for on-demand 3.6 and 5.8 GHz wireless applications. A partial rectangle-shaped structure is printed on the back face of the dielectric material, forming the antenna's ground (GND) plane. The radiating structure of the antenna consists of a C-shaped structure and a U-shaped ring connected to it, which is printed on the dielectric material's front face. The overall dimensions of the designed antenna are 0.160λo × 0.160λo × 0.02λo at the lowest operating frequency. The proposed antenna has a ka value of 0.56 at the lowest operating frequency, which is 3.59 GHz. Thus, the proposed antenna is considered as electrically small. The characteristic mode analysis is adopted to provide a clear understanding of the antenna's resonance behavior. The antenna has been fabricated and the simulation results were validated through measurements. Good agreement between simulated and measured results was obtained. Dual-band operation at 3.62 and 5.75 GHz was achieved, according to the measured reflection coefficient. The proposed antenna offers an adequate performance in terms of gain and efficiency, based on simulation and measurement results. Because of these characteristics, the antenna is well-suited to new wireless applications.

Keywords

Dual-bandelectrically small antennacompact antenna
Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 14 , Issue 9 , November 2022 , pp. 1130 - 1140
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Salamin, MA, Das, S and Zugari, A (2018) Design and realization of low profile dual-wideband monopole antenna incorporating a novel ohm (Ω) shaped DMS and semi-circular DGS for wireless applications. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications 97, 45–53.Google Scholar
Garg, P and Jain, P (2019) Design and analysis of a metamaterial inspired dual band antenna for WLAN application. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 11, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamin, MA, Ali, WAE, Das, S and Zugari, A (2019) Design and investigation of a multi-functional antenna with variable wideband/notched UWB behavior for WLAN/X-band/UWB and Ku-band applications. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications 111, 152895.Google Scholar
Shukla, BK, Kashyap, N and Baghel, RK (2018) A novel design of Scarecrow-shaped patch antenna for broadband applications. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 10, 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutejdar, A, Salamin, MA, Challal, M, Das, S, El Hani, S, Bennani, SS and Sarkar, PP (2018) A compact wideband monopole antenna using single open loop resonator for wireless communication applications. TELKOMNIKA 16, 2023–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volakis, JL, Chen, CC and Fujimoto, K (2010) Small Antennas: Miniaturization Techniques & Applications. USA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Sten, JC, Hujanen, A and Koivisto, PK (2001) Quality factor of an electrically small antenna radiating close to a conducting plane. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 45, 829–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman-Fort, SE and Rudish, RM (2009) Non-foster impedance matching of electrically-small antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 57, 2230–2241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohrabi, A, Dashti, H and Ahmadi-Shokouh, J (2020) Design and analysis of a broadband electrically small antenna using characteristic mode theory. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications 113, 152991.Google Scholar
Chaturvedi, D and Raghavan, S (2018) SRR-loaded metamaterial-inspired electrically-small monopole antenna. Progress in Electromagnetics Research C 81, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, SK, Abdalla, MA and Hu, Z (2018) Miniaturization of an electrically small metamaterial inspired antenna using additional conducting layer. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 12, 1444–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, SK, Abdalla, MA and Chaudhary, RK (2017) An electrically small sicrr metamaterial-inspired dual-band antenna for WLAN and WiMAX applications. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 59, 573–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, K, Dong, J, Ding, L and Chai, S (2020) An electrically small dual-band antenna covered with SRs and SRR. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters 94, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salih, AA and Sharawi, MS (2016) A dual-band highly miniaturized patch antenna. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 15, 1783–1786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ata, OW, Salamin, M and Abusabha, K (2020) Double U-slot rectangular patch antenna for multiband applications. Computers & Electrical Engineering 84, 106608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asif, S, Iftikhar, A, Rafiq, MN, Braaten, BD, Khan, MS, Anagnostou, DE and Teeslink, TS (2015) A compact multiband microstrip patch antenna with U-shaped parasitic elements. IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Vancouver, BC, 617–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, HA (1947) Fundamental limitations of small antenna. Proceedings of IRE 35, 1479–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, LJ (1948) Physical limitations of omnidirectional antennas. Journal of Applied Physics 19, 1163–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, R and Mautz, J (1971) Theory of characteristic modes for conducting bodies. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 19, 622–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, M and Dou, W (2019) Compact clock-shaped broadband circularly polarized antenna based on characteristic mode analysis. IEEE Access 7, 159952–159959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, WC and Chen, WR (2004) CPW-fed compact meandered patch antenna for dual-band operation. Electronics Letters 40, 1094–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esfahlani, SHS, Tavakoli, A and Dehkhoda, P (2011) A compact single-layer dual-band microstrip antenna for satellite applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 10, 931–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saghir, A, Abbas, SM, Afzal, MU, Tauqeer, T and Tariq, MH (2013) Compact dual-band microstrip antenna design using slits. International Conference on Computer, Control and Communication (IC4), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagar, S, Nagar, U and Meena, RS (2013) CPW-fed dual-band patch antenna for mobile applications. 5th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN), 1–5.Google Scholar