Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:33:06.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of Diagnostic tests for Screening and evaluating Breast Lesions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Technology Assessment Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.American Cancer Society. Facts and figures. New York: American Cancer Society, 1984.Google Scholar
2.Hall, D. C., Adams, C. K., Stein, G. H., Stephenson, H. S., Goldstein, M. K., & Pennypacker, H. S.Improved detection of human breast lesions following experimental training. Cancer, 1980, 46, 408–14.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Pennypacker, H. S., Bloom, H. S., Criswell, E. L. et al. , Toward an effective technology of instruction in breast self-examination. International Journal of Mental Health, 1982, 11, 98116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hall, D. C., Goldstein, M. K., & Stein, G. H.Progress in manual breast examination. Cancer. 1977, 40, 364–70.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.American Cancer Society Breast Self-Examination Subcommittee. BSE: Breast self-examination: A health practice for everyone. New York: American Cancer Society; Form #246.Google Scholar
6.Byrd, B. F.Close-up: Standard breast examination, CA, 1974, 24, 290–3.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Gallup Organization. Women's attitudes towards breast cancer. New York: Gallup Organization, 1973.Google Scholar
8.Mahoney, L. J., Bird, B. L., & Cooke, G. M.Annual clinical examination: The best available screening test for breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 1979, 301, 315–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Huguley, C. M. Jr, & Brown, R. L.The value of breast self-examination. Cancer, 1981, 47, 989–95.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Foster, R. S. Jr, Lang, S. P., Costanza, M. C., Worden, J. K., Haines, C. R., & Yates, J. W.Breast self-examination practices and breast-cancer stage. New England Journal of Medicine, 1978, 299, 265–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Greenwald, P., Nasca, P. C., Lawrence, C. E. et al. , Estimated effect of breast self-examination and routine physician examinations on breast-cancer mortality. New Eng land Journal of Medicine, 1978, 299, 271–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Feldman, J. G., Carter, A. C., Nicastri, A. D., & Hosat, S. T.Breast self-examination: Relationship to stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Cancer, 1981, 47, 2740–45.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Caine, P. Teaching breast self-examination. In Marchant, D. & Nyirjesy, I., (Eds.) Breast Disease: Proceedings of an International Symposium, New York: Grunne and Stratton, 1979.Google Scholar
14.Boice, J. D. Jr, & Monson, R. R.Breast cancer in women after repeated fluoroscopic examinations of the chest. JNCI, 1977, 59, 823–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Kopans, D. B., Meyer, J. E. & Sadowsky, N.Breast imaging. New England Journal of Medicine, 1984, 310, 960–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Hicks, M. J., Davis, J. R., Layton, J. M., & Present, A. J.Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer, Journal of the American Medical Association, 1979, 242, 2080–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Moskowitz, M.Screening for breast cancer: how effective are our tests? A critical review. CA, 1983, 33, 2639.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Shapiro, S., Venet, W., Strax, W., & Roeser, R.10–14 year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. JNCI, 1982, 69, 349–55.Google Scholar
19.Baker, L. H.The Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: Five-year summary report. CA, 1982, 32, 194225.Google Scholar
20.Egan, R. L.Experience with mammography in a tumor institution: evaluation of 1000 studies. Radiology, 1960, 75, 894900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Karsell, P. R.Mammography at the Mayo Clinic: A year's experience. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 1974, 49, 954–57.Google Scholar
22.Clark, R. L., Copeland, M. M., Egan, R. L. et al. , Reproducibility of the technique of mammography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of breast tumors. American Journal of Surgery, 1965, 109, 127–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Thomas, J. M., Fitzharris, B. M., Redding, W. H. et al. , Clinical examination, xeromammography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of breast tumors. British Medical Journal, 1978, 2, 1139–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Forrest, A. P. M.Cancer of the breast: Early diagnosis. British Medical Journal, 1970, 2, 465–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Johansson, N. T.Thermography of the breast: a clinical study with special reference to breast cancer detection. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica (Suppi), 1976, 460, 391.Google ScholarPubMed
26.Cole-Beuglet, C., Goldbert, B. B., Kurtz, A. B., Rubin, C. S., Patchefsky, A. S., & Shaber, G. S.Ultrasound mammography: A comparison with radiographic mammography. Radiology, 1981, 139, 693–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Kline, T. S., & Neal, H. S.Needle aspiration biopsy: A critical appraisal. Eight years and 3,267 specimens later. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1978, 239, 3639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Schondorf, H.Aspiration cytology of the breast. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1978.Google ScholarPubMed
29.Medical Practice Committee, American College of Physicians. Periodic health ex amination: A guide for designing individualized preventive health care in the asymp tomatic patient. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1981, 95, 729–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Eddy, E.ACS report on cancer-related health checkup. CA, 1980, 30, 194240.Google ScholarPubMed
31.Verbeek, A. L., Holland, R., Hendricks, J. H., Mravunac, M., Sturmans, F., & Day, N. E.Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography: First results of the Nijmegen Project, 1975–81. Lancet, 1984, 1, 222–24.Google Scholar
32.Collette, H. J., Day, N. E., Rombach, J. J., & de Waard, F.Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet, 1984, 1, 1224–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Tabar, L., & Gad, A.Screening for breast cancer: The Swedish trial. Radiology, 1981, 138, 219–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed