GENERAL ESSAYS
Health-care decision-making processes in Latin America: Problems and prospects for the use of economic evaluation
-
Cynthia P. Iglesias, Michael F. Drummond, Joan Rovira, for the NEVALAT Project Group
NEVALAT Project Group: Fernando Antoñanzas, Spain; SOIKOS and Universidad de la Rioja. Gabriel Carrasquilla, Colombia, Fundacion FES. Gerry Crosbie, UK, Office for Health Economics. Michael Drummond, UK. Centre for Health Economics, University of York. Ana María Galvez, Cuba; Escuela Nacional de Salud Pública. Martha González, Nicaragua; Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios de la Salud (CIES). Marino Gonzalez, Venezuela; Universidad Simón Bolívar. Carlos Gouveia Pinto, Portugal; Centro de Investigaciones Sobre Economia Portuguesa. Patricia Hernández, Mexico; World Health Organization. Cynthia Iglesias, UK; Centre for Health Economics/Department of Health Sciences, University of York. Luis Lazarov, Uruguay; Centro de Investigaciones Economicas (CINVE). Kely Rely, Mexico, Secretaria de Salud Pública. Joan Rovira, Spain; SOIKOS and Universidad de Barcelona. Adolfo Rubinstein, Argentina; Hospital Italiano. César Sanabria, Peru; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Adrian Towse, UK, Office for Health Economics. This report was prepared as part of Work Package 5 for the Thematic Network on the Economic Evaluation of Healthcare Programmes and its Applications to Decision Making in Latin American Countries (NEVALAT). Funded by the European Union. We would like to thank Lisa Matter and Sue Golder for conducting the electronic searches. -
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 1-14
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: The use of economic evaluation studies (EE) in the decision-making process within the health-care system of nine Latin American (LA) and three European countries was investigated. The aim was to identify the opportunities, obstacles, and changes needed to facilitate the introduction of EE as a formal tool in health-care decision-making processes in LA.
Methods: A comparative study was conducted based on existing literature and information provided through a questionnaire applied to decision makers in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Portugal Spain, United Kingdom, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Systematic electronic searches of HEED, NHS EED, and LILACS were conducted to identify published economic evaluation studies in LA from 1982 onward.
Results: There is relatively little evidence of the conduct and use of EE within the health care systems in LA. Electronic searches retrieved 554 records; however, only 93 were EE. In the nine LA participating countries, broad allocation of health-care resources is primarily based on political criteria, historical records, geographical areas, and specific groups of patients and diseases. Public-health provision and inclusion of services in health-insurance package are responsibilities of the Ministry of Health. Decisions regarding the purchase of medicines are primarily made through public tenders, and mainly based on differences in clinical efficacy and the price of health technologies of interest.
Conclusions: To expedite the process of incorporating EE as a formal tool to inform decision-making processes within the health-care systems in LA countries, two main conditions need to be fulfilled. First, adequate resources and skills need to be available to conduct EE of good quality. Second, decision-making procedures need to be modified to accommodate “evidence-based” approaches such as EE.
Systematic review of economic evidence on stroke rehabilitation services
- Bruce K. Brady, Lynda McGahan, Becky Skidmore
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 15-21
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: Given the resource-intensive nature of stroke rehabilitation, it is important that services be delivered in an evidence-based and cost-efficient manner. The objective of this review was to assess the evidence on the relative cost or cost-effectiveness of three rehabilitation services after stroke: stroke unit care versus care on another hospital ward, early supported discharge (ESD) services versus “usual care,” and community or home-based rehabilitation versus “usual care.”
Methods: A systematic literature review of cost analyses or economic evaluations was performed. Study characteristics and results (including mean total cost per patient) were summarized. The level of evidence concerning relative cost or cost-effectiveness for each service type was determined qualitatively.
Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria: three on stroke unit care, eight on ESD services, and four on community-based rehabilitation. All were classified as cost-consequences analysis or cost analysis. The time horizon was generally short (1 year or less). The comparators and the scope of costs varied between studies.
Conclusions: There was “some” evidence that the mean total cost per patient of rehabilitation in a stroke unit is comparable to care provided in another hospital ward. There is “moderate” evidence that ESD services provide care at modestly lower total costs than usual care for stroke patients with mild or moderate disability. There was “insufficient” evidence concerning the cost of community-based rehabilitation compared with usual care. Several methodological problems were encountered when analyzing the economic evidence.
Measuring cost-effectiveness of secondary health care: Feasibility and potential utilization of results
- Pirjo Räsänen, Harri Sintonen, Olli-Pekka Ryynänen, Marja Blom, Virpi Semberg-Konttinen, Risto P. Roine
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 22-31
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: Whether cost-effectiveness of secondary health care can be measured in a simple, yet commensurate way was studied.
Methods: Approximately 4,900 patients' health-related quality of life scores before and after treatment were measured. Used were a combination of quality of life data with diagnostic and financial indicators routinely collected in the hospital.
Results: Seventy percent of patients returned the first questionnaire and the informed written consent to participate. Of these patients, 80 percent also returned the second questionnaire sent out 3 to 12 months after treatment, depending on clinical specialty and diagnostic category. The routine of sending out questionnaires could be automated in such a way that data collection required only a limited amount of extra work. Patients were generally satisfied with the fact that the hospital was interested in their well-being also after treatment. No physician offered the chance to participate refused data collection in the patient group he or she was responsible for. The attitudes of the nursing staff were generally positive toward data collection, although it caused some extra work for some of them. The possibility of relating already routinely collected financial performance indicators with a relevant measure of treatment effectiveness, opened prospects for refined analysis of cost-effectiveness of secondary health care.
Conclusions: Routine collection of health-related quality of life data as an indicator of treatment effectiveness is feasible, requires only a small amount of extra work, and is potentially very useful when combined with existing measures of hospital performance.
Hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease: A cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment options
- Juan G. Gonzalez-Perez, Luke Vale, Sally C. Stearns, Sarah Wordsworth
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 32-39
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Background: During 2001, over 32,000 patients in the United Kingdom received renal replacement therapy (RRT). Approximately half had a functioning transplant, with the remainder receiving dialysis therapy. The main form of dialysis is hemodialysis (HD), which is provided to 37.1 percent of the RRT population. HD is provided in three main settings: hospital (24.5 percent), satellite (10.9 percent), or home (1.7 percent). The objective of this study is to explore the cost-effectiveness of these different modalities.
Methods: By using clinical and cost data from a systematic review, a Markov model was developed to assess the costs and benefits of the three different modalities. The model included direct health service costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results.
Results: Satellite HD has lower costs £46,000 and £62,050 at 5 and 10 years than home HD £47,660 and £63,540. The total effectiveness of home HD was slightly greater than for satellite HD, so the incremental cost per QALY of home versus satellite HD was modest at £6,665 at 5 years and £3,943 at 10 years. Both modalities dominated hospital HD.
Conclusions: Results from the study reveal that satellite HD was less costly than home HD, and home HD was less costly than hospital HD. The lack of robust data on the effectiveness and new dialysis equipment, which were not included in this review, throws some caution on these results. Nonetheless, the results are supportive of a shift from hospital HD to satellite and home HD.
Economic evaluation of hemodialysis: Implications for technology assessment in Greece
- Daphne Kaitelidou, Panagiotis N. Ziroyanis, Nikolaos Maniadakis, Lycurgus L. Liaropoulos
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 40-46
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: Hemodialysis is a well-established treatment for 74 percent of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients in Greece. The purpose of this study is to provide an estimate of the direct cost of dialysis in a public hospital setting and an estimate of the loss of production for ESRD patients. The results will be useful for public health facility planning purposes.
Methods: A socioeconomic prevalence-based analysis was performed using micro-economic evaluation of health-care resources consumed to provide hemodialysis for ESRD patients in 2000. Lost productivity costs due to illness were estimated for the patient and family using the human capital approach and the friction method. Indirect morbidity costs due to absence from work and long-term were estimated, as well as mortality costs. Mean gross income was used for both patient and family.
Results: Total health-sector cost for hemodialysis in Greece exceeds €171 million, or €182 per session and €229 per inpatient day. There were 2,046 years lost due to mortality, and the potential productivity cost was estimated at €9.9 million, according to the human capital approach, and €303.000, according to the friction method. Total morbidity cost due to absence from work and early retirement was estimated at more than €273 million, according to the human capital approach, and €12.5, according to the friction method.
Conclusions: Providing hemodialysis care for 0.05 percent of the population suffering from ESRD absorbs approximately 2 percent of total health expenditure in Greece. In addition to the cost for the National Health System, production loss due to mortality and morbidity from the disease are also considerable. Promoting alternative technologies such as organ transplantation and home dialysis as well as improving hemodialysis efficiency through satellite units are strategies that may prove more cost-effective and psychologically advantageous for the patients.
Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of pegylated interferon alfa in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: A systematic review and economic evaluation
- Jonathan Shepherd, Håkan F. T. Brodin, Carolyn Backer Cave, Norman R. Waugh, Alison Price, John Gabbay
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 47-54
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: To assess the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pegylated interferon alfa (2a and 2b) combined with ribavirin in previously untreated patients with moderate to severe chronic hepatitis C, compared with the current standard treatment, which is nonpegylated interferon alfa combined with ribavirin.
Methods: Systematic review and economic evaluation. A sensitive search strategy was applied to several electronic bibliographic databases. Relevant studies were critically appraised and meta-analyzed. A hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients entered a Markov model and were followed up for a more than 30-year period to predict natural history, duration spent in each health state, and treatment costs.
Results: Two fully published Phase III randomized controlled trials were included. Methodological quality was generally good. Dual therapy with pegylated interferon was significantly more effective than nonpegylated dual therapy with a pooled sustained virological response rate (SVR) of 55 percent (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 52–58 percent) compared with 46 percent (95 percent CI, 43–49 percent). The pooled relative risk of remaining infected was 0.83 (95 percent CI, 0.76–0.91 percent). Genotype was the strongest predictor of outcome, with SVRs in patients with the more responsive genotypes 2 and 3 reaching up to 80 percent. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for pegylated dual therapy compared with nonpegylated dual therapy was £12,123. The cost per QALY remained under £30,000 for most patient subgroups and in sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: Pegylated interferon is clinically effective, represents good value for the money, and is a significant advance in the treatment of this insidious disease.
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of initial combination therapy with interferon/peginterferon plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C in Germany: A health technology assessment commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security
- Uwe Siebert, Gaby Sroczynski, on behalf of the German Hepatitis C Model (GEHMO) Group and the HTA Expert Panel on Hepatitis C
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 55-65
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: The purpose of this health technology assessment (HTA), commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security, was to systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antiviral treatment (AVT) with interferon (INF) or peginterferon (PegIFN) in combination with ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and to apply these data in the context of the German health-care system.
Methods: We performed a systematic literature search on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of AVT and summarized results using meta-analysis and evidence tables. We applied the German Hepatitis C Model (GEHMO), a decision-analytic Markov model, to determine long-term clinical effectiveness, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of the examined treatment strategies. Model parameters were derived from German databases, published international randomized clinical trials (RCT), and a Cochrane Review.
Results: Overall, nine RCTs, two HTA reports, one Cochrane review, two meta-analyses, and seven economic evaluations met the inclusion criteria. These studies indicate that PegIFN+RBV achieved the highest sustained virological response rates (SVR) (54–61 percent), followed by IFN+RBV (38–54 percent) and IFN monotherapy (11–21 percent). Based on our meta-analysis, PegIFN+RBV reduced cases without SVR by 17 percent compared with INF+RBV. International cost-effectiveness studies indicate that INF+RBV is cost-effective when compared with INF monotherapy. For PegIFN+RBV, our decision analysis yielded an ICER of €9,800 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.
Conclusions: This HTA suggests that initial combination therapy prolongs life, improves quality of life, and is cost-effective in patients with CHC. Peginterferon plus ribavirin is the most effective and efficient treatment among the examined options. However, because not all chronic hepatitis C patients will develop progressive liver disease, a thorough assessment of the eligibility and appropriateness of treatment with combination therapy must be performed in each individual patient.
Assessing the in-hospital survival benefits of intensive care
- Amir Shmueli, Charles L. Sprung
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 66-72
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: For an efficient and fair allocation of medical resources, one must know which patients benefit more from medical care. The objective of this study is to assess the differential survival benefits of a general intensive care unit (ICU) by acute diagnoses and by Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores.
Methods: The sample included all patients triaged for admission to the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center ICU during a 7-month period (n = 381). The potential effect of ICU on in-hospital survival was estimated by a bivariate (admission–survival) probit model, using crowding in the unit as the identifying variable, controlling for observable patients characteristics: age, sex, acute diagnoses, and APACHE II score. Using the estimates, the differential predicted survival benefits of ICU were calculated for selected general acute diagnoses and for different APACHE II scores.
Results: Adjusting for age, sex, and general acute diagnoses, the average potential survival benefit of ICU is 17 percentage points (pts). The benefit of ICU for patients with central nervous system problems, with sepsis, or with respiratory failure are higher than average (23 pts). Adjusting for APACHE II scores as well increases the estimated average potential benefit to 21 pts. Over the range of APACHE II scores, the highest benefit (38 pts of potential benefit) is attained for patients with scores around 22.
Conclusions: Survival benefits differ across diagnoses and APACHE II scores. Facing limited resources, admission policies should distinguish between survival probabilities (and survival maximization) and survival benefits (and maximization of ICU benefits). Actual referral and admission policies to the present ICU do not maximize the potential survival benefits of ICU resources.
Determinants of the diffusion of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
- Eun-Hwan Oh, Yuichi Imanaka, Edward Evans
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 73-80
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: The aim of this study is to explain factors influential to the diffusion of computed tomography (CTs) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs).
Methods: Variables were identified from a review of the literature on the diffusion of health technologies. A formal process was applied to build a conceptual model of the mechanism that drives technology diffusion. Variables for the analysis were classified as predisposing, enabling, or reinforcing factors, in keeping with a model commonly used to explain the diffusion of health behaviors. Multiple regression analysis was conducted using year 2000 OECD data.
Results: The results of this study showed that total health expenditure per capita (p < .01, both CTs and MRIs) and flexible payment methods to hospitals (p < .05, both CTs and MRIs) were significantly associated with the diffusion of CTs and MRIs (adjusted R2 = 0.477, 0.656, respectively).
Conclusions: This study presents a systematically developed model of the mechanism governing technology diffusion. Important findings from the study show that purchasing power, represented by total health expenditure per capita and economic incentives to hospitals in the form of flexible payment methods, were positively correlated with diffusion. Another important achievement of our model is that it accounts for all thirty OECD member countries without excluding any as outliers. This study shows that variation across countries in the diffusion of medical technology can be explained well by a logical model with multiple variables, the results of which hold profound implications for health policy regarding the adoption of innovations.
Determinants of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging utilization in Taiwan
- Pei-Tseng Kung, Wen-Chen Tsai, Chih-Liang Yaung, Kai-Ping Liao
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 81-88
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) scanners are high-tech equipment with the highest utilizations and expenditures in Taiwan. This study investigates the factors that affect MRI and CT utilization, such as whether supply-side factors have more impact than demand-side factors, and the effect of utilization control policies.
Methods: This study used the nationwide CT and MRI claim data for the years 1998 to 2001 from the Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) in Taiwan. Multiple regression analysis was the statistical method used to determine the relative factors that influence CT and MRI utilization.
Results: CT : population ratio, hospital-based physician : population ratio, female ratio, pediatric (≤14 years) : population ratio, and family income significantly influenced CT utilization. MRI : population ratio and hospital-based physician : population ratio, female ratio, and family income significantly influenced MRI utilization. However, the proportion of the aged (≥65 years of age) did not significantly influence CT or MRI utilization after controlling for other factors. The rates of CT and MRI utilization for the outpatient and inpatient settings and the repeated uses of CT or MRI have decreased significantly after a utilization review was implemented by BNHI, which suggests that CT and MRI have been overused.
Conclusions: Increases in supply-side factors significantly increase CT/MRI utilization, and supply-side factors impact CT/MRI utilization more than demand-side factors. The results show that the utilization instant report policy effectively decreases repeated uses of CT/MRI.
International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment
- Eva Draborg, Dorte Gyrd-Hansen, Peter Bo Poulsen, Mogens Horder
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 89-95
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is defined as a policy research approach that examines the short- and long-term social consequences of the application or use of technology. Internationally different institutions have translated this definition to local contexts. In Denmark, HTA is comprehensive with focus on four aspects of the problem in question (technology [clinical evidence], economy, patient, and organization). The objective of this study is to study how the application of HTA differs across leading countries and to study the extent to which Danish HTA reports differ from foreign HTAs.
Methods: A sample of 433 HTA reports published in the period 1989–2002 by eleven leading institutions or agencies in Denmark and eight other countries were reviewed. We looked at the characteristics of the HTA with respect to focus on the four main aspects and the manner in which each aspect has been approached.
Results: The study shows health technology procedures to be the most common type of health technology assessed in HTAs and literature review to be the most often used method of analysis. Policy recommendations are only present in approximately half of the HTA reports.
Conclusions: In the HTAs one generally sees a great focus on the clinical aspect of health technologies, leaving the economic, the patient-related, and the organizational aspect much more unanalyzed. The Danish HTAs generally have a wider scope than HTAs produced in other countries and tend to focus more frequently on patient-related and organizational dimensions.
Can health technologies be assessed using routine data?
- Andrew J. Stevens, James Raftery, Paul Roderick
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 96-103
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: The potential of routine data for health technology assessment (HTA) in the United Kingdom was assessed.
Methods: Compiled were a comprehensive list of routine databases, their classification according to data characteristics, literature review on their current use, and their comparison with key topics identified as priorities for HTA.
Results: Two hundred seventy health-care databases for England or the English regions were identified. Twenty-four included data on both health technology and patient health state. Eleven found some published use in effectiveness evaluation. Of 140 prioritized health technologies, only 22 could be identified in routine databases.
Conclusions: Routine data are plentiful but of limited use in HTA. The data sets usually do not include the effect of treatments. Coding is inadequate, and confidentiality regulations will make matters worse. Both need urgent attention.
RESEARCH REPORTS
International Master's Program in health technology assessment and management: Assessment of the first edition (2001–2003)
- Pascale Lehoux, Renaldo N. Battista, Alicia Granados, Pedro Gallo, Stéphanie Tailliez, Doug Coyle, Marco Marchetti, Piero Borgia, Gualtiero Ricciardi
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 104-112
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Background: Despite a clear call for greater input from health technology assessment (HTA) in the areas of clinical practice and policy making, there are currently very few formal training programs. The objectives of our Consortium were to (i) develop a master's level program in HTA, (ii) test its content with a group of Canadian and European students, and (iii) evaluate the Program's strengths and weaknesses.
Objectives: This study presents the results of our evaluation of the first edition of the Master's Program (2001–2003).
Methods: The evaluation relied on (i) a self-administered student questionnaire for each course (n = 142), (ii) interviews with students (n = 10), and (iii) interviews with internship supervisors (n = 5).
Results: A vast majority of students were satisfied with the course content and particularly appreciated the exercises and materials presented in an intensive format. However, they needed more systematic feedback from faculty members and recommended increasing the methodology content. The six key characteristics of the program are (i) flexible format adapted to the needs of skilled professionals, (ii) continuous interaction between HTA users and producers, (iii) international academic and professional collaboration, (iv) partnership with HTA agencies, (v) global approach to evidence-based methods and practices, and (vi) multidisciplinary approach.
Conclusions: Despite the numerous organizational barriers inherent to creating an international program and several areas for improvement in the Program itself, the Ulysses Project was successful in attaining its objectives. Because there is a growing need for human resources with special training in HTA, further efforts need to be devoted to strengthening the international research capacity in HTA.
Validity of utilities of patients with esophageal cancer
- Peep F. M. Stalmeier, Angela G. E. M. de Boer, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers, Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes, Jan J. B. van Lanschot
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 113-118
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: The convergent validity between utility assessment methods was assessed.
Methods: Investigated were patients with esophageal cancer treated surgically with curative intent. Patients were interviewed in a period from 3 to 12 months after surgical resection. Patients evaluated their actual health and seven other states. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and standard gamble (SG) utilities were obtained for the health states in an interview. Patients also indicated whether or not they preferred death to living in a health state (worse than dead [WTD] preferences).
Results: Fifty patients completed the interview. Convergent validity was excellent at the aggregate and individual level. However, the relation between VAS and SG differed strongly across individuals. On a scale from 0 (dead) to 100 (perfect health), SG scores were lower for patients with WTD preferences (mean difference d=35; p=.002); however, VAS scores did not vary by WTD preferences.
Conclusions: In general, there is good agreement between VAS and SG measures, although patients disagree about how the VAS and SG are related. The standard gamble varied by WTD preferences, however, the VAS did not.
Meta-analysis when only the median survival times are known: A comparison with individual patient data results
- Stefan Michiels, Pascal Piedbois, Sarah Burdett, Nathalie Syz, Lesley Stewart, Jean-Pierre Pignon
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 119-125
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Background: The hazard ratio (HR) is the most appropriate measure for time to event outcomes such as survival. In systematic reviews, HRs can be calculated either from the raw trial data obtained as part of an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis or from the appropriate trial-level summary statistics. However, the information required for the latter are seldom reported in sufficient detail to allow reviewers to calculate HRs. In contrast, the median survival and survival rates at specific time points are frequently presented. We aimed to evaluate retrospectively the performance of meta-analyses using median survival times and survival rates by comparing them with meta-analyses using IPD to calculate HRs.
Methods: IPD from thirteen published meta-analyses (MAs) in cancers with high mortality rates were used. Median survival and survival rates were calculated from the IPD rather than taken from publications so that the same trials, patients, and extended follow-up are used in each analysis.
Results and Conclusions: We show that using median survival times or survival rates at a particular point in time are not reasonable surrogate measures for meta-analyses of survival outcomes and that, wherever possible, HRs should be calculated. Individual trial publications reporting on time to event outcomes, therefore, should provide more detailed statistical information, preferably logHRs and their variances, or their estimators.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of medical documentation alternatives
- Renata Kopach, Somayeh Sadat, Ian D. Gallaway, Glen Geiger, Wendy J. Ungar, Peter C. Coyte
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 126-131
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: The delay between patient discharge and the completion of the final discharge note have prompted hospitals to consider new information technologies. This study compared the relative cost-effectiveness of an automated medical documentation system to the current system in place at a Canadian hospital. There are significant expenditures associated with the choice of medical documentation system, yet the benefit to the patient population has not been studied.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was carried out. Cost data for the current documentation system were obtained from the study hospital. The costs of purchasing the automated system were obtained from the manufacturer. Other resource cost implications of the automated system were estimated based on information obtained from the Centre for Applied Health Informatics at the study hospital. The outcome was determined to be the average time (days) between patient discharge and note completion. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted. Sensitivity analyses were used to determine the robustness of the results.
Results: The automated documentation system was associated with higher costs but better outcomes than the current system. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio used for comparing the automated medical documentation system with the traditional system indicated that the incremental daily cost for decreasing a day in average note completion time per discharge note was 0.331 Canadian $/day over the study period (4 years).
Conclusions: Although the automated documentation system was more expensive than the current system, it also provided qualitative benefits that were not considered in the cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cost-effectiveness of Herceptin®: A standard cost model for breast-cancer treatment in a Belgian university hospital
- Mattias J. Neyt, Johan A. Albrecht, Bart Clarysse, Véronique F. Cocquyt
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 132-137
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: The objective of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of Herceptin® from the hospital's point of view. This new biotechnological pharmaceutical is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the HER2 receptor, an important anti-cancer target.
Methods: A cost model with standard diagnostic and treatment options for breast cancer was set up for a Belgian university hospital in close collaboration with its specialists. Direct and indirect costs were calculated for each diagnostic and treatment option using the micro-costing method. Effectiveness was estimated through a literature study. The model allowed us to take cost consequences in other stages of the model into account and to calculate changes in monthly treatment costs from different “starting points.” With an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, differences in costs and effectiveness with and without Herceptin® were compared.
Results: Over the complete treatment period from diagnosis until the metastatic phase, monthly costs for the hospital rose from €85.07 to €90.35 for stage I diagnosed breast cancer when adding Herceptin® to the model. In the metastatic phase alone, these costs rose from €1,132.33 to €1,256.23. With Herceptin®, we found an extra cost of €3,981.44 per extra life-month.
Conclusions: This cost-effectiveness ratio was rather high, because Herceptin® was quite expensive and the product was additive in its current use and did not replace existing treatments. Future research will concentrate on alternative applications of Herceptin® based on ongoing Herceptin® trials and expert opinions.
Can electronic routine data act as a surrogate for patient-assessed outcome measures?
- Hayley A. Hutchings, Wai-Yee Cheung, John G. Williams, David Cohen, Mirella F. Longo, Ian Russell
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 138-143
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives: There has been a rapid growth in the use of patient-assessed outcomes (PAOs) that are measured in the assessment of health technologies. The process of collection of such measures can be costly, and there may be problems associated with the ability of the patient to complete them. The use of electronically stored routine data may reduce costs and overcome the problems associated with patient completion. The feasibility of using routine data surrogates for the UK Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (UKIBDQ) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) was examined.
Methods: Clinical terms and codes for the UKIBDQ and SF-36 questions were identified, and data from electronic routine sources were sought on patients participating in a randomized controlled trial. The presence or absence of relevant symptoms was used to generate surrogate scores, which were compared with the original scores.
Results: Most questions in the UKIBDQ and SF-36 were codable but only one third of the terms were recorded routinely in electronic form. The surrogate total IBDQ score had reasonable reliability (Kuder–Richardson coefficient = 0.51), but this reliability could not be determined for the SF-36. Intraclass correlations between routine and designed data were poor to weak.
Conclusions: Although electronic routine data sources had the capacity to develop surrogate measures for patient assessed outcomes, there was evidence of wide underutilization of coding systems leading to an underreporting of symptoms. This finding is consistent with previous literature where only poor correlations were illustrated between patient assessed outcomes and surrogate scoring of symptoms.
Foreword
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS
Cost–benefit evaluation of routine influenza immunization in people 65–74 years of age
- S. Allsup, M. Gosney, A. Haycox, M. Regan
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, pp. 144-145
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness ofinfluenza vaccination in people 65–74 years of age in the absence of comorbidity.
Lowering blood pressure to prevent myocardial infarction and stroke: A new preventive strategy
- M. Law, N. Wald, J. Morris
-
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 March 2005, p. 145
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the screening performance of measuring blood pressure and other variables in identifying those who willdevelop, or die from, ischemic heart disease and stroke and too quantify by howmuch drugs that lower blood pressure will reduce the risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke in those designated “screen positive.”