Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:56:45.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition between Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) and Ephestia cautella (Walker) in cocoa beans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

J. Allotey  and
R. Kumar
J. Allotey
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
R. Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
Get access

Abstract

Competition between Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) and Ephestia cautella (Walker) was studied in broken cocoa beans using the two species alone, introduced one before the other and together. Both species of moths cannot co-exist for an extended period and in competition E. cautella becomes extinct. The results offer an explanation of recent evidence that C. cephalonica is rapidly becoming the most important pest of stored cocoa beans in Ghana today.

Résumé

La concurrence entre Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) et Ephestia cautella (Walker) a été étudié dans les graines de cacao concassées en n'utilisant que les deux espèces, en introduisant un avant l'autre, et en introduisant les deux en même temps. Les deux espèces ne peuvent pas coexister pour une longue période et quand ils sont en concurrence, E. cautella disparaît. Les résultats expliquent la preuve récente que C. cephalonica est en train de devenir l'insecte le plus important, ravageur de graines de cacao emmagasinées au Ghana.

Keywords

Corcyra cephalonicaEphestia cautellacompetitionpestresourcesgenerationpopulationabundanceexploitationCorcyra cephalonicaEphestia cautellaconcurrenceinsecte nuisibleressourcesgénérationpopulationabondanceexploitation
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , October 1985 , pp. 627 - 632
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allotey, J. (1984) Activity patterns of Corcyra cephalonica (Staint.) and Ephestia cautella (WLK.) and competition for pupation sites. Utter Pradesh J. Zool. 4, 150–155.Google Scholar
Allotey, J. (1985) Aspects of the biology of Corcyra cephalonica (Staint.) and Ephestia cautella (WLK.) Submitted for publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amoako-Atta, B. and Partida, G. J. (1976) Sensitivity of almond moth pupae to gamma radiation (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 49, 133–140.Google Scholar
Ayala, F. J. (1970) Competition, co-existence and evolution. In Essays in Evolution and Genetics (Edited by Hecth, M. L. and Steere, W. C.), pp. 121–158. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
Ayyar, P. N. K. (1934) A very destructive pest of stored products in South India, Corcyra cephalonica Stanton. Bull. ent. Res. 25, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakley, R. N. R. and Dingle, H. (1978) Competition: butterflies eliminate milk weed bugs from a Caribbean Island. Oecologia 37, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciesielska, Z. (1975) Studies of interspecific competition at early growth. Stages of a population of granary beetles Oryzaephilus surinamensis L. (Silvanidae), Sitophilus granarius L. (Curculionidae) and Rhizopertha dominica F. (Bostrychidae) (Col.). Ekol. Pol. 23, 163–183.Google Scholar
Cole, L. C. (1960) Competitive exclusion. Science 132, 348–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crombie, A. C. (1945) On competition between different species of graminivorous insects. Proc. R. Soc. 132, 362–395.Google Scholar
Debach, P. and Sundby, R. A. (1963) Competitive displacement between ecological homologues. Hilgardia 34, 106–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debach, P. (1966) The competitive displacement and coexistence principles. A. Rev. Ent. 11, 183–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durant, J. H. and Beveridge, W. W. (1913) Report on the temperature reached in army biscuits during baking, especially with reference to the destruction of the imported flour moth. Ephestia kuehniella. J. R. Army med. Corps 20, 615–634.Google Scholar
Escalante, G. and abinovich, J. E. (1979) Population dynamics of Telenomus fariai (Hymenoptera; Scelionidae), a parasite of Chagas' disease vectors. IX Larval competition and population size regulation under laboratory conditions. Res. Popul. Ecol. 20, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, P. W. (1957) Coactions in laboratory populations of two species of Daphnia. Ecology 38, 510–519.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. A. (1976) Problems of stored products entomology in Britain arising out of the import of tropical products. Ann. appl. Biol. 84, 120–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, M. E. (1974) Intraspecific competition between Drosophila larvae in serial transfer system (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ecology 55, 1154–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grist, D. H. and Lever, R. H. (1969) Pests of Rice, Tropical Science Series. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Hagvar, E. B. (1972) The effects of intra and interspecific larval competition for food (Myzus persicae) (Horn., Aphidae) on the development at 20°C of Syrphus ribesii and Syrphus corollae (Dipt., Syrphidae). Entomophaga 17, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highland, H. A. (1978) Insects infesting foreign warehouses containing package foods. J. Can. ent. Soc. 13, 251–256.Google Scholar
Howe, R. W. (1965) A summary of estimates of optimal and minimal conditions for population increase of some stored product insects. J. stored Prod. Res. 1, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffaker, C. B. (1958) Experimental studies on prédation: Dispersion factors and predatory-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27, 343–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karsholt, O. (1978) Some introduced Lepidoptera in the collection of the Zoological Museum, Copenhagen (Tineidae, Pyralidae). Ent. Medd. 46, 65–67.Google Scholar
Laraichi, M. (1978) Study of the intra and interspecific competition between the Oophagus parasites of wheat bugs. Entomophaga 23, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathanson, M. (1975) The effect of resource limitation on competing populations of flour beetles, Tribolium spp. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Bull. ent. Res. 65, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T. (1948) Experimental studies of interspecies competition I. Competition between populations of the flour beetles Tribolium confusum Duval and Tribolium castaneum Herbst. Ecol. Monogr. 18, 265–308.Google Scholar
Park, T. (1954) Experimental studies of interspecies competition II. Temperature, humidity and competition in two species of Tribolium. Physiol. Zool. 27, 177–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T. (1962) Beetles. Competition and populations. Science 138, 1369–1375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pianka, E. T. (1974) Evolutionary Ecology. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Pontin, A. J. (1961) Population stabilisation and competition between the ants Lasius flavus (F.) and L. niger (L.). J. Anim. Ecol. 30, 47–54.Google Scholar
Pruthi, H. S. and Singh, M. (1945) Stored grain pests and their control. The imperial council of agricultural research. Miscellaneous Bulletin No. 57.Google Scholar
Rafes, P. M., Raspovov, P. M. and Gninenko, J. I. (1979) Food competition of summer-autumn group birch pests in transural (lands east of Ural). Ser. Biol. 1, 63–71.Google Scholar
Rao, D. S. (1954) Notes on rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica (Staint.) (Family Galleridae, Lepidoptera). Indian J. Ent. 16, 95–114.Google Scholar
Teotia, T. P. and Singh, Yougeshwar (1975) Studies on the growth of population of Corcyra cephalonica (Stanton). Indian J. Ent. 37, 272–285.Google Scholar
Umeya, K., Kato, T. and Kocha, T. (1975) Studies on the comparative ecology of bean weevils. VI. Intra-specific competition in Callosobruchus analis (F.) (Col. Cur-culionidae). Jap. J. appl. ent. Zool. 19, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volterra, V. (1926) Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numéro d'individui in specie animali conviventi. Mém. Accad. Lincel. 2, 31–113.Google Scholar