Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:46:43.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of some rice varieties on the biology of the stalk-eyed fly Diopsis thoracica West (Diptera: Diopsidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

A. M. Alghali
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria
E. O. Osisanya
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access

Abstract

The effect of some rice varieties on the biology of the stalk-eyed fly Diopsis thoracica West was investigated. The rice varieties affected the developmental period from egg laying to adult emergence, the sex ratio, percentage survival, adult weights on emergence, ovary development and the rate of tiller damage by a single larva. The rice varieties OS6 and Tos 4121 were consistently the most unfavourable in terms of insect growth; but were the most susceptible in terms of damage. Thus varietal susceptibility to damage by the insect seemed to be different from varietal suitability for its growth.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abu, J. F. (1972) The bionomics of Diopsis (Diptera:Diopsidae) and of Epilachna similis (Coleoptera:Coccinellidae) on Oryza sativa L. in the Accra plains. MSc thesis. University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.Google Scholar
Alghali, A. M. and Osisanya, E. O. (1982a) Oviposition by Diopsis macrophthalma, Dalman (Diptera:Diopsidae) on different rice varieties and development of dead hearts. Bull. ent. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
Alghali, A. M. and Osisanya, E. O. (1982b) The effect of rice plant age on oviposition and susceptibility to diopsid damage. Int. Rice Res. Newsl. (in press).Google Scholar
Alghali, A. M. and Osisanya, E. O. (1982c) Effect of damage by stalk-eyed fly, Diopsis thoracica, West (Dioptera:Diopsidae) on the yield components of the rice crop. J. Field Crops Res. (in press).Google Scholar
Breniere, J. (1969) Importance des problems entomologiques dans le developpements de la riziculture des l'Afrique de l'Quest. Agron. trop. 24, 906922.Google Scholar
Dahms, R. G., Snelling, R. O. and Fonton, F. A. (1936) Effect of several varieties of sorghum and other host plants on the biology of the clinch bug. J. eeon. Ent. 29, 11471153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descamps, M. (1956) Insects nuisibles au riz dans le nord Cameroun. Agron. trop. 11, 732755.Google Scholar
Djamin, A. and Pathak, M. D. (1968) Role of silica in the resistance to Asiatic borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker) in rice varieties. J. econ. Ent. 60, 347351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobie, P. (1977) The contribution of the tropical Stored Products Centre to the study of insects' resistance in stored maize. J. Stored Prod. Inf. 34, 717.Google Scholar
Ghosh, B. N. (1962) A note on the incidence of Schoenobius incertules (Walker) on boro paddy under nitrogen fertilizers. Curr. Sci. 31, 472473.Google Scholar
Munakata, K. and Okamoto, D. (1964) Varietal resistance to rice stemborers in Japan. In Major Insect Pests of the Rice Plant. Proc. Symp. Int. Rice Res. Los Baños, 1964. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Perrin, R. M. (1978) The effect of some cowpea varieties on the development and survival of larvae of the seed moth. Cydia ptychora (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Bull. ent. Res. 68, 4756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, L. L., Fairchild, M. L. and Zuber, M. S. (1972) Effect on corn endosperm containing different levels of amylose on angoumois grain moth biology. I. Life cycle, certain physiological responses and infestation rates. J. econ. Ent. 65, 567583.Google Scholar
Singh, V. S., Bhatia, S. K. and Bansal, H. C. (1977) Susceptibility of barley varieties to Sitrotraga cereallela (Oliver) infestation and their effect on insects' development. Bull. Grain Technol. 15, 9599.Google Scholar