Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:37:27.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field Evaluation of Some Chemicals for Efficacy Against Bollworm and Cotton Stainer Species Attacking Cotton in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

A. M. Mambiri  and
B. A. Amadalo
A. M. Mambiri
Affiliation:
Cotton Research Station Kibos, P.O. Box 1490, Kisumu, Kenya
B. A. Amadalo
Affiliation:
Cotton Research Station Kibos, P.O. Box 1490, Kisumu, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

A field evaluation of nine chemicals was conducted at Cotton Research Station Kibos for their efficacy against bollworm and cotton stainer species attacking cotton in Kenya. Based on the yield and percentage stained seed cotton, Decis'Triazophos, pp 321 Karate and Baythroid and Decis were the most effective insecticides in 1985 and 1986 respectively. However, there was no consistency in results of performance of insecticides tested against cotton insects in the 2 years. The apparent poor performance of most insecticides tested against cotton insects was attributed to fixed insecticide spray schedule which resulted in superfluous and often mistimed chemical applications. It is therefore necessary to establish damaging threshold(s) of major cotton pests in this country so that chemicals can be efficiently used to control them with minimum adverse effects on our environment.

Résumé

Une étude aux champs de l'efficacité de 9 pesticides a été effectué à la Station Kibos Cotton Research sur le ver de la capsule et la punaise qui attaquent le coton au Kenya. En se basant sur le rendement et le pourcentage des graines de coton endommagées. Decis'Triazophos, pp 321 Karate et Baythroid et Decis se sont montrés les insecticides les plus efficaces respectivement en 1985 et 1986. Cependant, l'efficacité de ces insecticides testés sur les ravageurs du coton n'était pas le même pour les deux années. La faible efficacité de la plupart des insecticides testés sur les insectes du coton était due au choix d'un calendrier de traitement ayant un interval fixe. Ce programme de traitement a conduit à un gaspillage de produit et surtout à une mauvaise periode de traitement. Il est alors necessaire d'établir les seuils de dégâts des principaux ravageurs du coton dans le pays, pour que les insecticides peuvent être utilisés à bon escient pour la lutte de ces insectes avec un minimum d'effets néfastes à l'environment.

Keywords

Synthetic pyrethroidthresholdresistancecotton stainersDysdercus speciesAfrican cotton bollwormHeliothis armigeraDecisBaythroidpp 321 KaratePyrethrinoïdes de synthèseseuil de dégâtsrésistancepunaise du cotonver de la capsule Heliothis armigeraDecisBaythroidpp 321 Karate
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 287 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous (1985) The 1985 insecticide/acaricide recommendations for cotton. Circular letter from the senior Entomologist. Kenya Minist. Agric.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1986) The 1986 insecticide/acaricide recommendations for cotton. Circular letter from the Senior Entomologist. Kenya Minist. Agric.Google Scholar
Georghiou, G. P. and Taylor, C. E. (1977a) Genetic and biological influences in the evolution of insecticide resistance. J. Econ. Ent. 70, 319–323.Google Scholar
Georghiou, G. P. and Taylor, C. E. (1977b) Operational influences in the evolution of insecticide resistance. J. econ. Ent. 70, 653–658.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, R. H. (1976) Insect resistance to pesticides. In Plant Protection Service. Plant Production Division. Lecture Number 17, 138–144, FAO Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Hall, D. C. and Norgaard, B. R. (1973) On the timing and application of pesticides. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 55, 198–201.Google Scholar
Little, T. M. and Hills, F. T. (1977) Agricultural Experimentation: Design and Analysis. John Wiley and Sons. New York.Google Scholar
Mathews, G. A. and Tunstall, J. P. (1968) Scouting for pests and the timing of spray applications. Cotton Grow. Rev. 45, 115–127.Google Scholar
Mambiri, A. M. (1985) Susceptibility of Dysdercus spp. Boisduval (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae) to selected synthetic pyrethroid insecticides. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
Martin, H. and Woodcock, D. (1983) The Scientific Principles of Crop Protection. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Murega, T. N. and Khaemba, B. M. (1985) Evaluation of some chemicals for efficacy against the red spider mites, Tetranychus sp. (Acarina: Tetranychidae) attacking cotton in Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 6, 11–15.Google Scholar
Reed, W. (1972) Uses and abuses of unsprayed controls in spraying trials. Cotton Grow. Rev. 49, 67–72.Google Scholar
Stern, V. M., Smith, R. F., Bosch, R. and Hagen, K. S. (1959) The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29, 81–101.Google Scholar
Ware, G. W. (1978) Pesticides: Theory and Application. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.Google Scholar