No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 December 2008
1. New York: Pantheon Books,1984,399 pp.
2. Jones, David J. V.The Last Rising (Oxford, 1985), 213.Google Scholar
3. “Women and Nineteenth-Century Radical Politics: A Lost Dimension,” in Mitchell, JulietOakley, Ann, eds., The Rights and Wrongs of Women (Harmondsworth, 1976).Google Scholar
4. Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1981).Google Scholar Also see Alexander, Sally, ““Women, Class and Sexual Difference”, History Workshop 17 (1984):125–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, David J. V., “Women and Chartism”, History 222 (1983):1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. In Jones, Gareth Stedman, Languages of Class (Cambridge, 1983), 104–05.Google Scholar For a critique of Stedman Jones's general approach, see Foster, John, ““The Declassing of Language”,” New Left Review 150 (1985):29–45Google Scholar; also “Rethinking the Categories of Working Class History,” forthcoming.
6. Prothero, I. J., “William Benbow and the Concept of the ‘General Strike,’” Past and Present 63 (1974):141–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Cf. Wilentz, Sean, “Against Exceptionalism: Class and the American Labor Movement, 1790–1920”, International Labor and Working Class History 26 (1984): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. See Belchem, John, “1848: Feargus O'Connor and the Collapse of the Mass Platform”, in Epstein, JamesThompson, Dorothy, eds., The Chartist Experience (London, 1982).Google Scholar