Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T20:31:44.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gold Reserve Inc. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

United Kingdom, England.  02 February 2016 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State immunity — State Immunity Act 1978 — Award — Enforcement — Venezuela seeking to set aside order granting Canadian claimant company leave to enforce arbitration award — Whether Venezuela entitled to State immunity under Section 1 of Act — Venezuela party to 1998 Bilateral Investment Treaty with Canada — Whether Venezuela losing right to rely on State immunity — Whether serving of arbitration claim form required under Section 12 of Act

Arbitration — Award — Enforcement — Canadian claimant company seeking to enforce arbitration award against Venezuela — Venezuela party to 1998 Bilateral Investment Treaty with Canada — Whether Venezuela entitled to State immunity under Section 1 of State Immunity Act 1978 — Whether Venezuela losing right to rely on State immunity

Treaties — Interpretation — Canada–Venezuela Bilateral Investment Treaty, 1998 — Meaning of “investor” — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, Articles 31 and 32 — Ordinary meaning of “investor” in context and in light of object and purpose of Treaty — Whether Canadian claimant company “investor” within meaning of Treaty — Whether party to agreement to arbitrate — Whether Venezuela losing right to rely on State immunity — The law of England

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)