No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The 2010 Uncitral Arbitration Rules
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0020782900000711/resource/name/firstPage-S0020782900000711a.jpg)
- Type
- International Legal Documents
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010
References
End notes
* This text was reproduced and reformatted from the text available at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law website (visited Nov. 28, 2010) http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-revised/pre-arb-rules-revised.pdf.
1 The 2010 Rules were adopted at the 910th meeting of the Commission. See Report of UNCITRAL of its 43rd Session, June 21 – July 9, 2010, U.N. Doc. A/65/17 (2010), at 30-32. The 2010 Rules are reprinted at Annex 1 to the Report; id. at 79 et seq.
2 The 1976 Rules were adopted by the U.N. General Assembly by Res. 31/98. See G.A. Res. 31/98, U.N. GAOR, 31st Sess., U.N. Doc. A/31/17 (Dec. 15, 1976).
3 See Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce art. 12, available at http://www.sccinstitute.com/skiljedomsregler-4.aspx; Rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes art. 37, available at http://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/RulesMain.jsp; Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce art. 8 [hereinafter ICC Rules]; Rules of the London Court of International Arbitration art. 5, available at http://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/LCIA_Arbitration_Rules.aspx[hereinafter LCIA Rules]; Rules of the American Arbitration Association International Centre for Dispute Resolution art. 5, available at http://www.adr.org/sp.asp?id=33994.
4 See Cour de cassation [Cass.] [Supreme Court for Judicial Matters], Siemens AG & BKMI Industrieanlagen GmbH v. Dutco Constr. Co., Jan. 7, 1992, 4 ICC Bull. No. 2 (1993) (Fr.).
5 See LCIA Rules art. 8; ICC Rules art. 10.
6 See Uiterwyk Corp. v. Iran, 19 Iran-U.S. Cl. Trib. Rep. 107 (1988) (Supplemental Opinion of Judges Böckstiegel and Holtzmann).
7 Himpurna Ca. Energy Ltd. (Berm.) v. Republic of Indonesia, 25 Y.C.A. 13, 186 (2000).
8 See Antoine Biloune & Marine Drive Complex Ltd. v. Ghana Invs. Centre & Gov’t of Ghana, 19 Y.C.A. 11 (1994).
9 See Model Law art. 28. See also, e.g., ICC Rules art. 17(1); LCIA Rules art. 22.3. On the application of “rules of law” by arbitral tribunals, see, e.g., Yves Derains & Eric A. Schwartz, A Guide to the ICC Rules of Arbitration 235-38 (2d ed., 2005).
10 Compare, e.g., ICC Rules art. 28(6) with LCIA Rules art. 26.9.
11 See Arbitration Act 1996, § 69 (Eng. & Wales), reprinted in 36 I.L.M. 155 (1997) (appeal on point of law).