Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:19:54.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Court of Justice: Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , May 1984 , pp. 468 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the ICJ Order of May 10, 1984, with regard to the Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures and from the ICJ Order of May 14, 1984, fixing time–limits for written proceedingson questions of jurisdiction and admissibility.

[The operative paragraphs of the May 10 Order appear at I.L.M.page 477. The Separate Opinion of Judges Mosler and Jennings appearsat I.L.M. page 478. The Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebei appearsat page 479.

[The US letter to the UN Secretary–General concerning the nonapplicabilityof compulsory jurisdiction of the ICJ with regard todisputes with Central American States appears at I.L.M. page 670. The draft Security Council resolution condemning the mining ofNicaraguan ports, vetoed by the United States, appears at page 669.]

References

* [Reproduced from the ICJ Order of May 10, 1984, with regard to the Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures and from the ICJ Order of May 14, 1984, fixing time–limits for written proceedingson questions of jurisdiction and admissibility.

[The operative paragraphs of the May 10 Order appear at I.L.M.page 477. The Separate Opinion of Judges Mosler and Jennings appearsat I.L.M. page 478. The Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebei appearsat page 479.

[The US letter to the UN Secretary–General concerning the nonapplicabilityof compulsory jurisdiction of the ICJ with regard todisputes with Central American States appears at I.L.M. page 670. The draft Security Council resolution condemning the mining ofNicaraguan ports, vetoed by the United States, appears at page 669.]