Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:38:26.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Israel: Supreme Court Judgment in Cases Concerning Deportation Orders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judical and Similar Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* [ Reproduced from the English translation provided to International Legal Materials by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Judgment is commonly known as the “Affo” Judgment.]

[1] See also the remarks of Justice Holmes in Towne v. Eisner, 245 U.S. 418, 425 (1918).

* Translator's note: The translation appears in the the judgment.

[2] Regarding the restrictive Interpretation see: Guggenheim,Lehrbuch des Volkerrechts (vol. 1,1947) 128 and Lauterpacht, H.Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties,“ 26 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L. (1949) 48, 49, 58, 80 Google Scholar. Regarding the interpretation which seeks to limit the setting of restrictions on states,see: D.P. O'Connell, International Law (London, vol. 1, 1965) 275, which refers, Inter alia, to the Mosul Case,P.C.I.J.,ser.b.no.12,p.25(1925).

[3] That is: They are not to be applied unless they express general principles of law recognized by civilized states: O'Connell, supra, at 276.