Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:39:15.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States: Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988-Title I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

John H. Barton  and
Bart S. Fisher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Legislation and Regulations
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 15 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* [Reproduced from U.S. Public Law 100-418, Title I, of August 23, 1988. For the Content Summary, see the Table of Contents at I.L.M. Page 31. The Introductory Note was prepared for international Legal Materials by John H. Barton, Professor of Law, Stanford University Law School, and Bart S. Fisher, District of Columbia Bar and Professorial Lecturer in International Relations, The Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.]

1 OJ No C 26, 1.2. 1988, p. 1.

2 Opinion delivered on 17 June 1988 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

3 OJ No 43, 12. 7. 1960, p. 921/60.

4 OJ No L 332, 26. 11. 1986, p. 22.

5 OJ No L 91, 18.4.1972, p.13.

1 See Explanatory Notes below.

1 See Explanatory Notes below.

1 See Explanatory Notes below.

1/ Act, section 201(a). [I.L.M. p. 90].

2/ Act, section 201(b)(2)(B). [I.L.M. p. 90].

3 Act, section 202(c)(2)(A). [I.L.M. p. 91]

4/ Report to the President on Certain Motor Vehicles and Certain Chassis and Bodies Therefor, U.S.International Trade Commission Investigation No. TA-201-44 (Dec. 3, 1980) [20 ILM 189 (1981)].

5/ Id., Opinion of Chairman Alberger.

6/ Act, section 201(a) and (b). [I.L.M. p. 90]

7/ Act, section 202(a)(2). [I.L.M. p. 90]

8/ Act, section 202(f)(2)(F). [I.L.M. p. 94]

9/ Act, section 203(a). [I.L.M. p. 94]

10/ Act, section 203(a). [I.L.M. p. 94]

11/ Act, section 203(e)(l)(A) and (B). [I.L.M. p. 95]

12/ Act, section 203(c). [I.L.M. p. 95]

13/ Act, section 203(c). [I.L.M. p. 95]

14/ Act, section 203(e)(3). [I.L.M. p. 96]

15/ Section 203(e)(4). [I.L.M. p. 96]

16/ Section 204(a). [I.L.M. p. 96]

17/ Section 204(b).[I.L.M. p. 96]

18/ Section 1421(c)(1). [I.L.M. p. 99]

19/ Section 1421(b). [I.L.M. p. 98]

20/ Act, sec. 1321(a).[I.L.M. p. 73]

21/ Act, sec. 1321(b).[I.L.M. p. 75]

22/ Act, sec. 1323. [I.L.M. p. 75]

23/ Act, sec. 1317. [I.L.M. p. 71]

24/ Act, sec. 1316. [I.L.M. p. 70]

25/ Act, sec. 1321.[I.L.M. p. 73]

26/ Act, sec. 1313.[I.L.M. p. 70]

27/ Act, sec. 1312.[I.L.M. p. 69]

28/ Act, sec. 1315. [I.L.M. p. 70]

29/ Act, sec. 1335. There is an exception for Defense Department purchases subject to a Memorandum of Understanding in effect as of January 1, 1988.[I.L.M. p. 82]

30/ Current U.S. drawback provisions permit a U.S. importer to be refunded 99 percent of the tariffs paid on imported articles if they are incorporated into another product that is exported from the United States within 5 years. The Act's exemption of additional antidumping and countervailing duties from the drawback provisions will be a powerful incentive to use domestic products rather than imported articles subject to antidumping or countervailing duties.

31/ Act, sec. 1330(b). [I.L.M. p. 81]

32/ Act, sec. 1326.[I.L.M. p. 79]

33/ This is underlined by the statute, which permits the President to “direct” the U.S.S.R. which remedies to take with regard to retaliatory actions. Act, section 301(a) and (b).[I.L.M. p. 59]

34/ Act, section 301(a)(2).[I.L.M. p. 59]

35/ Act, section 301(d)(3). [I.L.M. p. 61]

36/ Act, sec. 304(a)(2) and (3). [I.L.M. p. 63]

37/ Act, sec. 302(a)(2).[I.L.M. p. 61]

38/ Act, sec. 302(b)(2)(B).[I.L.M. p. 62]

39/ Act, sec. 302(c). [I.L.M. p. 62]

40/ The U.S.T.R. determined that the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations would provide “a more effective way to open the Japanese rice market to U.S. exports.” Federal Register, Vol. 53, No. 215, November 7, 1988, 44970.

41/ Act, sec. 310. [I.L.M. p. 65]

42/ Act, sec. 1203(a). [I.L.M. p. 51]

43/ Act, sec. 1210.[I.L.M. p. 53]