Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T09:19:24.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

European Communities1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Extract

Meeting from September 22 to 25, 1959, the European Parliamentary Assembly discussed the principles and problems involved in the establishment of a multilateral European trading association. Opening the debate, Mr. M. P. A. Blaisse (Dutch Popular Catholic) stated that experience had shown that the common market could be considered the driving force of European economic integration. Although at present involving only a part of Europe, it could expand and develop in several ways—by the accession of new members, by the creation of a multilateral association, or by the conclusion of bilateral agreements. Whatever the form of its evolution, the obligations undertaken by member states within the framework of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) could not be ignored; similarly, it was imperative to take into account the interests of the United States and Canada. Thus he suggested that special agreements could be concluded with these two countries, to minimize the effects of trade discrimination, along with continued negotiations with members of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). He warned against compromise on the final aim, namely, the establishment of a multilateral association. The President of the European Economic Commission, Mr. W. Hallstein, thereupon presented the Commission's recommendations for a trade program on which the six nations could agree. He stated that such a program had to be pragmatic and realistic, and fulfill several conditions: improvement of economic conditions of the nations both inside and outside the European Economic Community (EEC), taking into account Europe's relations with the rest of the world, in particular with the United States; strengthening of the feelings of solidarity between the Community and all those affected by its external commercial policy; and general improvement of trade relations. He urged that care be taken to avoid giving the impression that EEC practiced a policy of discrimination and asked therefore that every effort be made to prove that its aim was the liberalization of trade throughout the world. Specifically, after the next GATT conference, EEC should, in his opinion, forthwith give its agreement to further tariff reductions and, in addition, promote the granting of aid to underdeveloped countries. At the European level, he proposed the creation of a “contact committee, comprised of representatives of the Community and other countries or groups to study the question of the development of external commercial relations. Mr. Hallstein concluded by pointing out that the proposals of his Commission were neither complete nor final. The speakers that followed agreed, on the whole, with the above-mentioned suggestions, but no resolution was adopted and it was decided to re-examine the whole matter at future sessions.

Type
International Organizations: Summary of Activities: III. Political and Regional Organizations
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Forward in Europe, 10 1959 (Vol. 1, No. 4), p. 7Google Scholar.

3 Council of Europe News, 01 1960 (New Series No. 6), p. 13Google Scholar.

4 For example, the Ministers for Foreign Affairs of the European Communities met at Strasbourg on November 23–24, under the chairmanship of Mr. Pella, and decided to hold regular exchanges of views, every three months, on questions of international policy affecting the Communities. See ibid., p. 12–13.

5 The Times (London), 11 26, 1959Google Scholar.

6 Council of Europe News, 03 1960 (New Series No. 7), p. 4Google Scholar.

7 Bulletin from the European Community, 0809 1959 (No. 37), p. 45Google Scholar; see also Forward in Europe, 08 1959 (Vol. 1, No. 3), p. 8Google Scholar.

8 Bulletin from the European Community, 1011 1959 (No. 38), p. 810Google Scholar.

9 Ibid., p. 10.

10 Ibid., p. 15.

11 Ibid., January 1960 (No. 39), p. 7.

12 See International Organization, Autumn 1959 (Vol. 13, No. 4), p. 654655CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 The Times (London), 12 23, 1959Google Scholar.

14 Bulletin from the European Community, 01 1960 (No. 39), p. 57Google Scholar; see also The New York Times, December 30, 1959.

15 Bulletin from the European Community, 1011 1959 (No. 38), p. 13Google Scholar. For a summary of Mr. Hallstein's recommendations, see above.

16 Bulletin from the European Community, 1011 1959 (No. 38), p. 45Google Scholar.

17 See International Organization, Autumn 1959 (Vol. 13, No. 4), p. 656Google Scholar.

18 Bulletin from the European Community, 1011 1959 (No. 38), p. 5Google Scholar.

19 Council of Europe News, 11 1959 (New Series No. 5), p. 4Google Scholar.

20 Ibid., January 1960 (New Series No. 6), p. 13; see also Bulletin from the European Community, 01 1960 (No. 39), p. 4Google Scholar.

21 Ibid., p. 3.

22 Ibid., p. 5. For a summary of the 15th session, see International Organization, Winter 1960 (Vol. 14, No. 1), p. 223224CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 The New York Times, March 4, 1960.

24 Ibid., March 5, 1960.

25 Ibid., March 11, 1960.

26 Bulletin from the European Community, 0809 1959 (No. 37), p. 5Google Scholar.

27 The Times (London), 02 4, 1960Google Scholar.

28 Bulletin from the European Community, 1011 1959 (No. 38), p. 56Google Scholar.

29 Ibid., p. 7.

31 Ibid., p. 15.

32 Ibid., p. 15.

33 Ibid., January 1960 (No. 39), p. 8–9.