Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T10:43:16.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Management of Power and Political Organization: Some Observations on Inis L. Claude's Conceptual Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 International Organization, Spring 1961 (Vol. 15, No. 2), p. 219235CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Quotations in the following pages, unless otherwise noted, are from this article.

2 Without getting involved in fine semantic distinctions, let us simply note that a grouping such as that of the Warsaw Pact countries, while nominally an international organization of independent states, is in actuality nearer a Soviet imperium. For purposes of this paper, it will be so classed. Although its members have separate votes in the United Nations and other international agencies, they are always cast as a unit, which applies to no other so-called “bloc”; there is no nonsense about who controls the power of this group.

3 I cannot see, however, how the balance of power concept can also cover that “extreme of decentralization,” a scheme within which individual states operate either “singly or in combinations.” Each-state-for-itself is international anarchy–the absence of, rather than a system of, management. Alliance agreements may be very loose, but whatever the understanding entered into, it constitutes a form of joint undertaking, even if the coordinating “agency” of the arrangement is no more than a signed treaty.

4 Quoted in Russell, Ruth B., A History of the United Nations Charter (Washington, D. C: Brookings, 1958), p. 396.Google Scholar

5 “Introduction to the Annual Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of the Organization 16 June 1960–15 June 1961,” General Assembly Official Records, Supplement 1A, p. 1.