Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:09:20.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the Good News About Law Compliance Good News About Norm Compliance? The Case of Racial Equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Zoltán I. Búzás
Get access

Abstract

The most important international human rights norms are legalized or codified in international treaty law. Yet pernicious practices at odds with these norms endure and sometimes even increase after legalization. According to conventional wisdom, this is because agents commit to but do not comply with international law and the underlying norms. I develop a theory of evasion to explain why norm violations persist even when states technically comply with the law. Because legalization transposes social norms into international law imperfectly, it creates gaps between laws and underlying norms. Because of these norm-law gaps, legality and normative appropriateness will diverge. States caught between opposing pressures from pro-violation and pro-compliance groups exploit this gap through what I call evasion—the intentional minimization of normative obligations that technically complies with international law but violates underlying norms. I demonstrate the theory's empirical purchase in the cases of the French expulsion of Roma immigrants and the Czech school segregation of Roma children. Under the cover of technical compliance with the law, these states violated the norm of racial equality. The argument cautions that the good news about law compliance is not necessarily good news about norm compliance, broadens our understanding of norm violators' agency, and has practical implications for human rights advocacy.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , Spring 2018 , pp. 351 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. The Concept of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3):401–19.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2010. Injustice Renamed: Discrimination in Education of Roma Persists in the Czech Republic. London: Amnesty International Publications.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2012. Five More Years of Injustice: Segregated Education for Roma in the Czech Republic. London: Amnesty International Publications.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2015. Must Try Harder: Ethnic Discrimination of Romani Children in Czech Schools. London: Amnesty International Publications.Google Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip. 2014. With Arms Wide Shut: Threat Perception, Norm Reception, and Mobilized Resistance to LGBT Rights. Journal of Human Rights 13 (3):337–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Mark. 2008. Racism and Equality in the European Union. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bleich, Erik, and Pekkanen, Robert. 2013. How to Report Interview Data. In Interview Research in Political Science, edited by Mosley, Layna, 84–105. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bracic, Ana. 2016. Reaching the Individual: EU Accession, NGOs, and Human Rights. American Political Science Review 110 (3):530–46.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen. 2013. Constructivism and International Law. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations, edited by Dunoff, Jeffrey and Pollack, Mark, 119–45. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buell, Samuel, and Griffin, Lisa. 2012. On the Mental Consciousness of Wrongdoing. Law and Contemporary Problems 75 (2):133–65.Google Scholar
Búzás, Zoltán. 2017. Evading International Law: How Agents Comply with the Letter of the Law but Violate Its Purpose. European Journal of International Relations 23 (4):857–83.Google Scholar
Cahn, Claude, and Chirico, David. 1999. A Special Remedy: Roma and Schools for the Mentally Handicapped in the Czech Republic. European Roma Rights Centre.Google Scholar
Carnegie, Allison, and Carson, Austin. Forthcoming. The Spotlight's Harsh Glare: Rethinking Publicity and International Order. International Organization.Google Scholar
Cloward, Karisa. 2014. False Commitments: Local Misrepresentation and the International Norm Against Female Genital Mutilation and Early Marriage. International Organization 68 (3):495–526.Google Scholar
CNCDH. 2014. La lutte contre le racisme, l'antisemitisme et la xenophobie. Available at <http://www.cncdh.fr/fr/publications/rapport-sur-la-lutte-contre-le-racisme-lantisemitisme-et-la-xenophobie-2014>..' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=CNCDH.+2014.+La+lutte+contre+le+racisme,+l'antisemitisme+et+la+xenophobie.+Available+at+.>Google Scholar
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD). 1998–2007. Concluding Observations, Czech Republic, various years. Available at <http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Countries/ENACARegion/Pages/CZIndex.aspx>..>Google Scholar
Conseil d'État. 2011. Association SOS Racisme—Touche pas à mon pote. No. 343387.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2012. Descriptive Glossary of Terms Relating to Roma Issues. Available at <http://a.cs.coe.int/team20/cahrom/documents/Glossary%20Roma%20EN%20version%2018%20May%202012.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Cronin-Furman, Kate. 2015. Just Enough: The Politics of Accountability for Mass Atrocities. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
CSA. 2012. Xenophobie, antisemitisme, racisme, anti-racisme et discriminations en France. No. 1201646.Google Scholar
Republic, Czech. 2016. Revised Action Plan for the Execution of the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights. 5 February.Google Scholar
Dixon, Jennifer. 2017. Rhetorical Adaptation and Resistance to International Norms. Perspectives on Politics 15 (1):83–99.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2006. The Virtues of Legalization. In The Legalization of Human Rights, edited by Meckled-Garcia, Saladin and Çali, Başak, 67–80. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Downs, George, Rocke, David, and Barsoom, Peter. 1996. Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3):379–406.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren. 1992. Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation in Civil Rights Law. American Journal of Sociology 97 (6):1531–76.Google Scholar
Eurobarometer. 2012. Discrimination in the EU in 2012. Special Survey 393.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2000. Regular Report on the Czech Republic's Progress Towards Accession. 8 November.Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights. 2007. Case of D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic. 13 November. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
European Roma Rights Centre. 2002. Barriers to the Education of Roma in Europe. 5 May.Google Scholar
European Roma Rights Centre. 2013a. Written Comments on France for Consideration by the European Commission on the Transposition and Application of the Race Directive and on the Legal Issues Relevant to Roma Integration.Google Scholar
European Roma Rights Centre. 2013b. ERRC Condemns Hitler Hate Speech Against Roma.Google Scholar
Farkas, Lilla. 2014. Report on Discrimination of Roma Children in Education. European Network of Legal Experts in the Non-Discrimination Field. Available at <https://www.equalitylaw.eu/downloads/1338-discrimination-of-roma-children-in-education-en-final>..>Google Scholar
Fassin, Éric, Fouteau, Carine, Guichard, Serge, and Windels, Aurélie. 2014. Roms et riverains: Une politique municipale de la race. Paris: La Fabrique.Google Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha. 2012. Why States No Longer Declare War. Security Studies 21 (4):557–93.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2000. Are Legal Norms Distinctive? NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 32 (3):699–705.Google Scholar
Gunther, Caitlin. 2012. France's Repatriation of Roma: Violation of Fundamental Rights? Cornell International Law Journal 45 (1):205–25.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew, and Linos, Katerina. 2014. Human Rights Backsliding. California Law Review 102 (3):603–54.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2005. Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology 110 (5):1373–411.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona. 2002. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Yale Law Journal 111 (8):1935–2042.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence. 2002. Overlegalizing Human Rights. Columbia Law Review 102 (7):1832–911.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence, and Voeten, Erik. 2014. International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe. International Organization 68 (1):77–110.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted, and Allan, Bentley. 2016. Making Identity Count: Building a National Identity Database. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huda, Ahmad. 2011–2012. Legal Remedies for the Gypsies. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 33 (4):1075–108.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 1996. Roma in the Czech Republic: Foreigners in their Own Land. Available at <https://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/1996/Czech.htm>..>Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2011. France's Compliance with the European Free Movement Directive and the Removal of Ethnic Roma EU Citizens. Available at <https://www.hrw.org/news/2011/09/28/frances-compliance-european-free-movement-directive-and-removal-ethnic-roma-eu>..' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Human+Rights+Watch.+2011.+France's+Compliance+with+the+European+Free+Movement+Directive+and+the+Removal+of+Ethnic+Roma+EU+Citizens.+Available+at+.>Google Scholar
Inder, Claire. 2010. International Refugee Law, “Hyper-Legalism” and Migration Management: The Pacific Solution. In The Politics of International Migration Management, edited by Geiger, Martin and Pécoud, Antoine, 220–51. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
International Law Commission. 2016. Fragmentation of International Law. UNGA, A/CN.4/L.682.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Chanoch. 1979. Permissiveness and Norm Evasions. Sociology 13 (2):219–33.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 2000. Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3):661–83.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. 2002. The International Human Rights Movement: Part of the Problem? Harvard Human Rights Journal 15:101–25.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2016. The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2007. Formalism, Fragmentation, Freedom: Kantian Themes in Today's International Law. NoFo 4:7–28.Google Scholar
Lake, Milli. 2017. Building the Rule of War: Postconflict Institutions and the Micro-Dynamics of Conflict in Eastern DR Congo. International Organization 71 (2):281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Yonatan. 2013. Best Evidence: The Role of Information in Domestic Judicial Enforcement of International Human Rights Agreements. International Organization 67 (3):469–503.Google Scholar
Lutz, Ellen, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2000. International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America. International Organization 54 (3):633–59.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2015. The Romani Gypsies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, Richard, and Rasmusen, Eric. 2007. Norms and the Law. In Handbook of Law and Economics, Vol. 2, edited by Polinsky, A. Mitchell and Shavell, Steven, 1575–618. Oxford: North-Holland.Google Scholar
McBarnet, Doreen, and Whelan, Christopher. 1991. The Elusive Spirit of the Law: Formalism and the Struggle for Legal Control. The Modern Law Review 54 (6):848–73.Google Scholar
Meckled-Garcia, Saladin, and Çali, Başak, eds. 2006. The Legalization of Human Rights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ministère de l'Intérieur. 2010. Circulaire “Evacuation des campements illicites” (5 August) IOC/K/1017881/J.Google Scholar
Ministère de l'Intérieur. 2012. Document sent by Jean Daubigny to Dezideriu Gergely, containing OQTF and APRF data.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2):217–52.Google Scholar
Nuñez-Mietz, Fernando. 2016. Lawyering Compliance with International Law: Legal Advisers in the “War on Terror.” European Journal of International Security 1 (2):215–38.Google Scholar
Open Society Foundations. 2016. Strategic Litigation Impacts Roma School Desegregation. Available at <https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/strategic-litigation-impacts-roma-school-desegregation>..>Google Scholar
Percy, Sarah. 2007. Mercenaries: Strong Norm, Weak Law. International Organization 61 (2):367–97.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2014. A Fragile Rebound for EU Image on Eve of European Parliamentary Elections. Available at <http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/05/12/a-fragile-rebound-for-eu-image-on-eve-of-european-parliament-elections/>..>Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2015. Faith in European Project Reviving. Available at <http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/06/02/faith-in-european-project-reviving/>..>Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard. 1996. The Destruction of Social Capital through Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 (5):2055–77.Google Scholar
Pillinger, Mara, Hurd, Ian, and Barnett, Michael. 2016. How to Get Away with Cholera: The UN, Haiti, and International Law. Perspectives on Politics 14 (1):70–86.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sight: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52 (3):613–44.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 2013. The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Rebecca. 2011. (Im)plausible Legality: The Rationalisation of Human Rights Abuses in the American “Global War on Terror.” The International Journal of Human Rights 15 (4):605–26.Google Scholar
Schropp, Simon. 2009. Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1986 [1964]. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shuck, Peter 2000. The Limits of Law. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, and Pollack, Mark. 2010. Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists in International Governance. Minnesota Law Review 94 (3):706–99.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2013. The United States and Torture: Does the Spiral Model Work? In The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance, edited by Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn, 145–63. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie. 2004. Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice. International Security 28 (3):5–44.Google Scholar
STEM. 2015. Czech Survey Reports—Research Information from STEM Trends 4/2010 [Informace z výzkum stem trendy 4/2010]. Available at <https://www.stem.cz/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/1943_1262.pdf> Accessed 5 March 2017.+Accessed+5+March+2017.>Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. 2001. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, Geoffrey. 2013. International Law and Public Attitudes Toward Torture: An Experimental Study. International Organization 67 (1):105–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirt, Frederick. 1970. Politics of Southern Equality: Law and Social Change in a Mississippi County. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Zahumenský, David. 2013. Czech Country Report on Measures to Combat Discrimination. European Network of Legal Experts in the Non-Discrimination Field.Google Scholar
Zarbiyev, Fuad. 2015. A Genealogy of Textualism in Treaty Interpretation. In Interpretation in International Law, edited by Bianchi, Andrea, Peat, Daniel, and Windsor, Matthew, 251–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Búzás supplementary material

Appendix

Download Búzás supplementary material(File)
File 178.2 KB